Evaluation of performance in different types of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) stations among Undergraduate Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v11i1.635Keywords:
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), different station, procedural skill, clinical reasoning.Abstract
An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is now a well-recognized modern type of examination often used in faculties of medicine and health sciences all over the world. Though the assessment tool has been designed to assess different types of clinical skill but this is evident that student performance are not the same in different types of stations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performances in different types of OSCE stations among undergraduate medical students. Three types of stations were set in this cross-sectional study. They were clinical reasoning, history taking and procedure performing. On the examination day all the students had attended 3 stations for procedure, 4 stations for clinical reasoning and 3 stations for history taking. The scores were collected and transferred to excel spreadsheet. Mean score of each types of modules were calculated. Statistical difference between all three means were measured by one-way ANOVA F-test. F was 7.2 and p-value was 0.001304. The result was significant at p<0.05 in two-tailed hypothesis. There was a significant difference in the scores of different types of stations in OSCE. Strongest performance was observed in procedural skill and weakest in clinical reasoning. Performance was moderate in history taking skills.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences
Copyright transfer and contributions agreement to publish in Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS)
Transfer our author right to Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS Publishers) along with title, interest in article without any limitations. The Journal shall own the work, including 1) copyright; 2) the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee; 3) the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and 4) the right for electronic/visual reproduction, electronic storage and to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format or printed publications.
We, the authors certify to participate sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception and design of this work or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it and have agreed to have our name listed as a contributor. We believe the manuscript represents valid work. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter. Any such involvement, publishers of BJMS are not responsible and the authors are held for any untoward practices if any. Any other reproduction of the said article requires the permission from the publisher.
Authors also state that, the work is original and is not infringing with the rights of others and copyrights. Author also further declares that, each co-author have contributed significantly and have accepted to be co-authors for their significant contribution for the work.
We certify that all the data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and no data from the study has been or will be published separately. We attest that, if requested by the editors, we will provide the data/information or will cooperate fully in obtaining and providing the data/information on which the manuscript is based, for examination by the editors or their assignees.
We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as per the request of the journal, do the rest of the correspondence on our behalf and he/she will act as the guarantor for the manuscript on our behalf. All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript, but who are not contributors, are named in the Acknowledgment and have given us their written permission to be named. If we do not include an Acknowledgment that means we have not received substantial contributions from non-contributors and no contributor has been omitted.