Penerokaan Gaya Keibubapaan Ibu Bapa Kelas Sosial Rendah Yang Mempunyai Anak Berpencapaian Rendah
Keywords:
kaunseling, kognitif-tingkah laku, motivasi, keibubapaan, autoritarian-permisifAbstract
Kajian ini adalah berasaskan masalah keibubapaan bagi ibu bapa yang mempunyai anak berpencapaian rendah dan dijalankan bagi tujuan meneroka gaya keibubapaan mereka supaya boleh dijadikan panduan dalam menjayakan program intervensi, iaitu Terapi Tingkah laku Kognitif. Seramai lima puluh orang ibu bapa yang mempunyai anak berpencapaian rendah serta mempunyai masalah tingkah laku telah dipilih bagi mengikuti Terapi Tingkah laku Kognitif sebagai program intervensi yang dijalankan dalam tempoh tiga bulan. Dalam tempoh tersebut, ibu bapa telah diberikan bimbingan keibubapaan melalui kaunseling individu dan kaunseling kelompok. Bagi tujuan pengumpulan data, hanya sepuluh orang sahaja ibu bapa dipilih dari jumlah asal iaitu lima puluh orang. Data yang dikumpul adalah hasil rakaman tiga sesi kaunseling individu dan tiga sesi kaunseling kelompok pada bulan pertama program intervensi dijalankan. Artikel ini adalah huraian data kualitatif tentang gaya keibubapaan bagi peserta kajian yang direkodkan semasa sesi kaunseling individu dan kelompok pada tempoh sebulan program intervensi dijalankan. Berasaskan lima tema yang dikumpul, data menunjukkan bahawa kesemua peserta mengaplikasi gaya keibubapaan gabungan autoritarian-permisif abaian, mempunyai efikasi keibubapaan yang rendah, aspirasi bagi masa depan kanak-kanak yang rendah, gagal menyediakan pelbagai bentuk sokongan bagi membaiki pencapaian kanak-kanak serta kawalan tingkah laku yang longgar. Dapatan kajian adalah selaras dengan teori kitaran kemiskinan. Ibu bapa dan kanak-kanak memerlukan pelbagai bentuk sokongan supaya pencapaian akademik kanak-kanak boleh diperbaiki.
References
Ahmad, S. Z., & Abdul Mutalib, A. (2015). Preliminary Study: An investigation on learning assistance requireent among low achievers in primary schools. International Journal of Computer Application, 114, 48–54.
Ashworth, K., Hardman, J., Liu, W. C., Maguire, S., Middleton, S., Dearden, L., Emmerson, C., Frayne, C., Ichimura, H., & Meghir, C. (2001). Education maintenance allowance: The first year. Quantitative Evaluation, Research Report 257. London: DfEE.
Aturupane, H. (1997). Earning Functions and Rates of Return to Education in Sr Lanka. UC-ISS Project Working Paper Series No 9701, University of Colombo, Colombo.
Baumrind, D. (1967). Child-care practices anteceedings: Three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Monograph, 75, 43–88.
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child Development, 55, 83–96.
Bernstein, J. (2007). Is education the cure for poverty?. The American Prospect. Retrieved from http://www. Prospect.org/cs/articles=is_education_the_cure_for_poverty.
Best, J. K., & Khan, K. V. (1998). Research in education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Blanden, J., Goodman, A., Gregg, P. & Machin, S. (2002). Changes in intergerational mobility in Britain. Discussion Paper No. 517, London : Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economic.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory, in R. Vasta (Ed.) Six theories of child development, Vol. 6, Greenwich, CT :JAI.
Chen, Z., & Kaplan, H. (2001). Intergenarational transmission of constructive parenting. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 17–31.
Conger, R. D., Patterson, G. R., & Ge, X. (1995). It takes two to replicate: A meditational model for the impact of parents’ stress on adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 66, 80–97.
Corey, M. S., Coorey, G., & Corey, C. (2017). Group process and practice. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., Airasian, P. W. (2014). Qualitative data collection. In G. Mills, & Airasian, Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications, (pp.333-397) Edinburgh : Pearson.
Hamre, B. K, & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.
Harris, K., & Marmer, J. (1996). Poverty, paternal involvement and adolescent wellbeing. Journal of Family Issues, 17(5), 614–40.
Hasan, O. R., & Rasiah, R. (2011). Poverty and student performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Institutions and Economies, 3(1), 61–76 .
Hobcraft, J. (1998). Intergenarational and life course transmission of social exclusion: Influences of childhood poverty, family disruption, and contach with the police. CASE Paper 15 London: London School of Economics, STICERD.
Hoff, E., Laursen, B., & Tardif, T. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M Bornstein (Ed.) Handbook of Parenting,Vol. 2 (2nd Edt.) London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hollon, S. D., & Beck, A. T. (1994). Cognitive and cognitive-behavioral therapies. In M.J Lambert, A. E. Bergin & S.L. Garfileds (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. NY: Wiley.
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. In L. Lynn & M.McGearry (Eds.) Inner-City poverty in the United States, Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press.
Larzelere, R. E., & Patterson, G. R. (1990). Parental management: Mediator of the effect of socioeconomic status on early delinquency. Criminology and Pathology, 10, 215–33.
Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2001). Motivational characteristics of under achievers in Hong Kong. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 417–430.
Lewis, O. (1966). La vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty. San Juan and New York: Guilford Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Baverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family. Parent-child interaction. In P.H Mussen & E.M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Socialization, Personality, and Social Development, NY: Wiley.
Malaysia. (2015). Education for all 2015 National Review.unesdoc.unescoorg/iages/0022/0022/0022/002297/229719 E
McSherry, D. (2004). Which camme first, the chicken or the egg ? Examining the relationship between child neglect and poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 727–33.
Parke, R. (2002). Fathers and families. In M.H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 3: Social condtitions and applied parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Propper, C., Burgess, S., & Rigg, J. A. (2004). The impact of income on child health: Evidence from a birth cohort study, CASE Paper, 85. London : CASE, London School of Economics.
Ross, D. P., & Roberts, P. (1999). Income and child well-being: A new perspective on the poverty debate. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.
Sani, N., & Idris, A. R. (2013). Identifying the challenges encountered by teachers in dealing with indigenous students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 1(3), 48–63.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus group, theory and practice: Applied social research methods. Newbury Park CA: Sage. Talib, J. (2003). Work Conditions, Parenting Styles and Children's School Achievement: A Study of Dual Earner Families in Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney. Australia.
Talib, J. (2009). Profesionalisme kaunselor sekolah rendah. Jurnal Malim, 10, 159–182.
Talib, J., Mohamad, Z., & Mamat, M. (2011). Effects of parenting style on children development. World Journal of Social Science, 1(2), 14–35.
Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: A survey of household resources UNICEF (2015). Out of school initiative. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/education/bege_61659html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Total Views: 16
| 
Total Downloads: 28
