ON THE JOB TRAINING DESIGN IN IMPROVING PERFORMANCE AT 4.0 ERA: STUDY ON AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/sapj.v7i3.5241Keywords:
Training, On the Job Training, Performance, EmployeeAbstract
At 4.0 era of industrial revolution, training’s role becomes more important for organizations because it will increase effectiveness and efficiency not only for individuals but for organizations. Many things affect performance, but the most important factor in improving performance is training. This study aims to evaluate On the Job Training design implementation at PT YXZ and see
how the variables in the OJT design contribute to improving employee performance. Sampling technique method is probability random sampling with the Slovin formula according to the number of employees of each unit. The population in this study were all permanent employees with a total of 1,665. Samples were taken from various positions and tenure. The number of samples obtained was 323 employees. The results of the validity and reliability test are known that the Cronbach’s Alpha value of each indicator is above 0.9 so it can be said that all indicators have a very good level of reliability. The Pearson Product Moment correlation value is above 0.8 so that the measuring instrument is considered valid. Based on the results of the frequency distribution, it was found that according to OJT, 70.51% respondents had been implemented quite well. The results of the simultaneous regression test resulted in a Pvalue = 0.000 (P< 0.05) which means that Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. The value of how much influence the overall indicator on the effectiveness of OJT is displayed in the regression model as follows, OJT Factor Value = 2,422 + 0.015 (total value of OJT Implementation items). The results of this study prove that the design model in OJT have a significant influence in to performance.
References
Abdul, R., Khan, G., Khan, F. A., & Khan, M. A. (2011). Impact of Training and Development on Organizational Performance, 11(7).
Amstrong, M. (2000). “Understanding Training”. Human Resource Management Practice (8th Edition). London: Kogan page limited.
Bramley, P. (2003). Evaluating Training (2nd ed.). UK: CIPD UK.
Bullock. (2012). Professional Development For Your Employees. Retrieved from http://www.scontrinopowell.com/2012/professional-developmentfor-your-employees-–-a-sound-investment/
Ginsberg, L. (1997). Training for the Long Haul. Computer Shopper, Vol. 17, 4.
Iftikhar, A., & Din, G. S. ud. (2009). EVALUATING TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT. Pakistan: Gomal Medical College and Gomal University, D.I.Khan.
Karim, M. R., Huda, K. N., & Khan, R. S. (2012). Significance of Training and Post Training Evaluation for Employee Effectiveness : An Empirical Study on Sainsbury ’ s Supermarket Ltd, 7(18), 141148. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n18p141
Kirkpatrick Level 3 Survey Questions. (n.d.), 3.
Lee, C., Esen, E., & DiNicola, S. (2017). Employee Job Satisfaction and Engagement: The Doors of Opportunity Are Open, 1–12.
Partlow, C. G. (1996). Human-Sesources Practices of TQM Hotels. Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 37 No, 67–77.
Pilbeam, S., & Corbridge, M. (2002). People Resourcing: HRM in practice (2nd ed.). UK: Financial times prentice hall.
Tsaur, S. H., & Lin, Y. C. (2004). Promoting Service Quality in Tourist Hotels: The Role of HRM Practices and Service Behavior. Tourism
Management, 25, 471.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Total Views: 119
| 
Total Downloads: 72
