FOREST FOR DOMESTIC WATER CATCHMENT OF GUNUNG TEBU FOREST RESERVES, TERENGGANU
Keywords:
Watershed, domestic water used, ecosystem servicesAbstract
Forests play an important role as water catchments for all downstream demands, suchas domestic, industrial, and agricultural use. They provide not only quantity of water but also good-quality clean water. Forests help prevent impurities from entering streams, lakes, and groundwater in several ways. This process is called water purification but occurs naturally. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the importance of forest reserves, specifically the Gunung Tebu Forest Reserve (FR) in Besut, Terengganu, as a water catchment, especially for domestic use. Data on Bukit Bunga Water Treatment Plants (WTP) intakes, cost information, and forest land uses from the National Forest Inventory V (NFI V) are the main inputs for the analysis. Results show that the overall average marginal value for Gunung Tebu FR is RM297.24/ha/year. This value can be used to consider the operational cost implications of WTPs for the water purification services provided by the FR. A comparative analysis of the water catchment for Bukit Bunga WTP covers an area of 6,456.4 ha, of which approximately 88.6% is the Gunung Tebu FR. Therefore, the conservation of forest reserves as water catchment areas is important to ensure the availability of clean water, especially for domestic use.
References
Chichilnisky G., Heal G.M .1998. Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391:629–630
Forster, D.L., Bardos, C.P. and Southgate, D.D. 1987. Soil Erosion and Water Treatment Costs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 42, 349-352.
Freeman III, A.M., Herriges, J.A., & Kling, C.L. 2014. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780917
McConnell, Kenneth E. & Bockstael, Nancy E., 2006. "Valuing the Environment as a Factor of Production," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 14, pages 621-669,
Elsevier. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.
Moore W.B., McCarl B.A.1987. Off-site costs of soil erosion: a case study in the Willamette Valley. West JAgric Econ 12:42–49
Spiller M., McIntosh B.S., Seaton R.A.F., Jeffrey P. 2013. Pollution source control by water utilities – characterisation and implications for water management: research results from England and Wales. Water Environ J. 27:177–186. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00340.x
Sthiannopkao S .2007. Soil erosion and its impacts on water treatment in the northeastern provinces of Thailand. Environ Int 33:706–711
Unasylva. 2019. in Sarre A. (ed) . An International Journal of forestry and forest industries. Vol 70 2019/1
Vincent J.R .2011.Valuing the environment as a production input. In: Haque AKE et al (eds) Environmental valuation in South Asia Cambridge University Press, New Delhi, pp 36–77
Vincent J.R., Ismariah A., Norliyana A., Burwell W.B., Subrehendu P. &Tan Shoo J.S. 2015. Valuing Water Purification by Forests: An Analysis of Malaysian Panel Data. Environ Resource Econ. 61. DOI 10.1007/s10640-015-9934-9