OPTIMIZATION OF DNA EXTRACTION AND PCR AMPLIFICATION FOR POLLEN DNA BARCODING FROM FLOWERING PLANTS
Keywords:
DNA barcoding, flowering plants, PCR optimization, pollenAbstract
DNA barcoding is a molecular technique that relies on short DNA region for species identification, with its accuracy and reliability is getting enhanced with the advance technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). Pollen identification using DNA barcoding offers a precise and reliable approach that is independent of morphological traits. However, challenges such as the presence of a robust exine layer encapsulating DNA, inhibitors, and contaminants necessitate improved DNA extraction methods from flowering plant pollen. Additionally, the minute quantity of DNA available in a single pollen grain complicates extraction and subsequent analysis. This study aimed to optimise DNA extraction and amplification methods for pollen DNA barcoding and to assess DNA quality using agarose gel electrophoresis. Nine species of flowering plants; Acacia auriculiform, Melastoma malabatricum, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa, Ixora chinensis, Tetracena indica, Mischocarpus sundaicus, Acronychia pedunculata, Malaleuca cajuputi, and Gmelina asiatica were obtained from Taman Rimba Ilmu Tanah BRIS UniSZA Kampus Besut (TRIBE). DNA was extracted from 50 to100 mg of pollen grains and flowers using two different kits. Three plant DNA markers, the rbcL, ITS2 and trnL were used for PCR optimization. DNA extraction from 100 mg of plant tissue (pollen with flower) yielded more distinct bands compared to 50 mg, indicating improved DNA quality with increased sample mass. Among the eight DNA samples obtained through optimised extraction, six demonstrated successful amplification with at least one marker; rbcL, ITS2, or trnL, as evidenced by distinct bands at the expected sizes. While rbcL and ITS2 consistently produced clear and specific bands, amplification with trnL resulted in multiple bands across several samples, suggesting non-specific binding or primer-dimer formation. This non-specific amplification may complicate downstream sequencing and species identification, indicating that trnL may be less suitable for these plant tissues under the current PCR conditions. BLAST analysis of six plant samples amplified with the rbcL marker identified four to the species level: Ixora chinensis, Tetracera indica, Acronychia pedunculata, and Rhodomyrtus tomentosa which based on high sequence identity (≥92.59%) and significant E-values. The remaining two samples were resolved only to the genus level (Acacia sp. and Mischocarpus sp.), indicating limitations in species-level resolution for certain taxa. These findings underscore the importance of DNA extraction quality in achieving efficient PCR amplification and highlight that marker selection, particularly the use of rbcL plays a critical role in accurate species-level identification. Further optimisation of the PCR conditions for the trnL marker is recommended to improve amplification specificity.
References
Abubakar, B. M., Salleh, F. M., Omar, M. S. S., & Wagiran, A. (2018). Assessing product adulteration of Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat Ali) herbal medicinal product using DNA barcoding and HPLC analysis.
Pharmaceutical Biology, 56(1), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2018.1479869/IPHB_56_1479869_PDF.PDF
Abdel-Latif, A., & Osman, G. (2017). Comparison of three genomic DNA extraction methods to obtain high DNA quality from maize. Plant Methods, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-016-0152-4
Aggarwal, G., Edhigalla, P., & Walia, P. (2022). A comprehensive review of high-quality plant DNA isolation. The Pharma Innovation Journal. SP-11 (6), 171-176.
Amin Asyraf, T., Muhammad Faris, M. R., Mohd Azwan, J., Mohd Norfaizal, G., & Noriha, M. A. (2019). DNA extraction and amplification of rbcL from bee breads collected by Malaysian stingless bees (Heterotrigona itama). Trans. Malaysian Soc. Plant Physiol. 26, 348-351.
Bayram, N. E. (2021). Molecular approach to detecting pollen types in honey: DNA barcoding. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 49(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.15671/hjbc.623487
Bossler, A., & Van Deerlin, V. (2009). Conventional and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Cell and Tissue Based Molecular Pathology: A Volume in the Foundations in Diagnostic Pathology Series, 33–49.
Cahyaningsih, R., Compton, L. J., Rahayu, S., Brehm, J. M., & Maxted, N. (2022). DNA Barcoding Medicinal Plant Species from Indonesia. Plants, 11(10), 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11101375
Ceccherini, M. T., Poté, J., Kay, E., Van, V. T., Maréchal, J., Pietramellara, G., Nannipieri, P., Vogel, T. M., & Simonet, P. (2003). Degradation and Transformability of DNA from Transgenic Leaves. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(1), 673. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.673-678.2003
Chua, L. S. L., Sang, J., Pereira, J. T., Khoo, E., & Maycock, C. R. (2023). Current state of knowledge on the extinction risk of Malaysian tree species: Proximate needs to mitigate loss. In Plants People Planet, 5(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10320.
Dairawan, M., & Shetty, P. J. (2020). The evolution of DNA extraction methods. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res, 8(1), 39-45.
Gorki, J. L., Suchan, T., & Talavera, G. (2024). Protocol to sequence markers from pollen grains carried by long-range migratory butterflies using metabarcoding. STAR Protocols, 5(3), 103012. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.XPRO.2024.103012
Hendling, M., & Barišić, I. (2019). In-silico Design of DNA Oligonucleotides: Challenges and Approaches. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 17, 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSBJ.2019.07.008
Izham, N. H. M., Saidon, N. A., Samad, A. F. A., & Wagiran, A. (2023). Evaluation of DNA quality from modified DNA extraction and amplification of its2 from Eurycoma longifolia capsule herbal products. Jurnal Teknologi, 85(1), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.18545
Russo, A., Mayjonade, B., Frei, D., Potente, G., Kellenberger, R. T., Frachon, L., Copetti, D., Studer, Bruno., Frey, J.E., Grossniklaus, U., & Schlüter, P.M. (2022). Low-input high-molecular-weight DNA extraction for long-read sequencing from plants of diverse families. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 883897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.883897
Khan, S. A., Baeshen, M. N., Ramadan, H. A., & Baeshen, N. A. (2019). ITS2: An Ideal DNA Barcode for the Arid Medicinal Plant Rhazya Stricta. Pharmaceutical Medicine, 33(1), 53–61 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-019-00266-3
Li, D., Shi, G., Li, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Xiang, S., & Jin, S. (2022). PlantNet: A dual-function point cloud segmentation network for multiple plant species. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 184, 243-263.
Lowe, A., Jones, L., Witter, L., Creer, S., & de Vere, N. (2022). Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify Floral Visitation by Pollinators. Diversity, 14(4), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/D14040236/S1
Meeuse, & JD, B. (2025, August 19). Pollination | Definition, Process, Types, agents of, & facts. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/pollination.
Naim, D. M., & Mahboob, S. (2020). Molecular identification of herbal species belonging to genus Piper within family Piperaceae from northern Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 32(2), 1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.11.036.
Prudnikow, L., Pannicke, B., & Wünschiers, R. (2023). A primer on pollen assignment by nanopore-based DNA sequencing. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1112929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1112929
Sajali, N., Wong, S. C., Hanapi, U. K., Abu Bakar @ Jamaluddin, S., Tasrip, N. A., & Mohd Desa, M. N. (2018). The Challenges of DNA Extraction in Different Assorted Food Matrices: A Review. Journal of Food Science, 83(10), 2409–2414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14338
Simel, E. J., Saidak, L. R., & Tuskan, G. A. (1997). Method of Extracting Genomic DNA from Non-Germinated Gymnosperm and Angiosperm Pollen. BioTechniques, 22(3), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.2144/97223bm02
Teklemariam, D. M., Gailing, O., Siregar, I. Z., Amandita, F. Y., & Moura, C. C. M. (2023). Integrative taxonomy using the plant core DNA barcodes in Sumatra’s Burseraceae. Ecology and Evolution, 13(4), e9935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9935
Tüfekçi, E. D. Evaluation of Different DNA İsolation Techniques in Honey, Pollen and Propolis Samples Belonging to Çankırı Province. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 13(1), 582-591.
Turk Dermastia, T., Vascotto, I., Francé, J., Stanković, D., & Mozetič, P. (2023). Evaluation of the rbcL marker for metabarcoding of marine diatoms and inference of population structure of selected genera. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1071379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1328336
Utama, M. N., Etikawati, N., Sugiyarto, & Susilowati, A. (2024). New specific primer matK and rbcL region for DNA barcode pitcher plant Nepenthes spathulata. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 25(6), 2515–2523. https://doi.org/10.13057/BIODIV/D250621
Yang, Y., Zhou, Q., Zahr, K., Harding, M. W., Feindel, D., & Feng, J. (2021). Impact of DNA extraction efficiency on the sensitivity of PCR-based plant disease diagnosis and pathogen quantification. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 159(3), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-020-02189-1
Yong, W. T. L., Mustafa, A. A., Derise, M. R., & Rodrigues, K. F. (2024). DNA barcoding using chloroplast matK and rbcL regions for the identification of bamboo species in Sabah. Advances in Bamboo Science, 7, 100073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bamboo.2024.100073
Wei, N., Nakajima, F., & Tobino, T. (2018). Effects of treated sample weight and DNA marker length on sediment eDNA based detection of a benthic invertebrate. Ecological Indicators, 93, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2018.04.063