RE-CONCEPTUALIZING INFORMATION CREDIBILITY IN THE AGE OF NETWORKING SOCIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v23i.1121Keywords:
Information credibility, networking society.Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to re-conceptualize the concept of information credibility. This is due to the fact that the current society, which is best labelled as network society are becoming more complicated in relation to consuming information. The boundary of information producer and consumers are becoming thinner due to the advances in information technology. The existing body of knowledge about information credibility also warrant further investigation. Studies on information credibility are dispersed between the disciplines of communication, information technology and business studies. This has resulted in different conception of information credibility. Thus, this study was carried out using the Grounded Theory approach. There were four focus group discussions held to identify how the current society perceived information credibility. The choice of informants was based on the existing dialogue of digital natives and digital migrants. The finding shows that there is indeed new conception of information credibility. The concept of source and message are being strengthened, while two new concepts; viral and behaviour were added. The finding also reveals generational differences that warrant further investigation. The finding of this study is still open for further test due to the limitations of grounded theory approach.
References
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Pobleta, B. 2011. Information Credibility on Twitter. Paper presented in the International World Wide Web Conference, March 28 – April 1, 2011, Hyderabad, India
Daymon, C., & Holoway.I. 2011. Qualitative Research Method in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. London. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Eastin M.S, 2001. Credibility Assessment of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 6(4)
Jarvenpaa., S.L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. 2000. Consumer Trust in An Internet Store. Information Technology and Management. 1(1/2), 45 – 71
Johnson T.K., & Kaye B.K. 1998. Cursing is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 75(2), 325 – 340
Johnson T.K., & Kaye B.K. 2004. Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 81(3), 622 – 642
Karahana G.D., & Straub D.W. 2003. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Intergrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51 – 90
McKnight DH., & Kacmar C.J.2007. Factors and Effects of Information Credibility. ICEC 07’ Proceedings of the Ninths International Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM, New York. Available online: http://dl/acm/org/citation.cfm?doid=1282100.1282180. (accessed on 24th July 2015)
Metzger MJ. 2007. Making Sense of Credibility on the Web: Models for Evaluating Online Information and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(13), 2078 – 2901
Pandit, N.R., 1996. The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method. The Qualitative Report. Vol 2(4) Available online: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-4/pandit .html (accessed on 24th July 2015)
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppp, J.T/ 1984. Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihodd Model of Persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668 – 672
Wathen N., Beirkell, J. 2002. Believe it or Not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(2) 134- 144
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Total Views: 236
| 
Total Downloads: 222
