PROPAGANDA DAN DISINFORMASI: POLITIK PERSEPSI DALAM PILIHAN RAYA UMUM KE-14 (PRU-14) MALAYSIA

PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION: POLITICS OF PERCEPTION IN MALAYSIAN's 14TH GENERAL ELECTION (GE-14)

Authors

  • Lee Kuok Tiung Fakulti Kemanusiaan, Seni & Warisan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Rizal Zamani Idris Fakulti Kemanusiaan, Seni & Warisan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Rafiq Idris Fakulti Perniagaan, Ekonomi & Perakaunan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.vi.1648

Keywords:

PRU-14, kewartawanan, media sosial, wacana publik, kepentingan publik, GE-14, journalism, social media, public discourse, public interest

Abstract

Media memainkan peranan penting membentuk pemikiran pengundi. Media baharu sekali lagi dilihat memainkan peranan penting dalam menetapkan dan membentuk wacana publik pada PRU-14 di Malaysia. Media merupakan sumber maklumat politik yang utama kepada rakyat dalam masyarakat demokratik meskipun berita bukanlah kebenaran mutlak, apatah lagi fakta dan fiksyen sering kali dicampur aduk bagi maksud mencapai agenda tersembunyi. Pada dasarnya, bukan semua orang mempunyai pengalaman sebenar atau langsung dengan kebanyakan isu atau peristiwa yang hangat diperdebatkan sebagai topik yang mempunyai kepentingan publik. Sarjana kewartawanan seperti Tuchman (1978) sering menekankan bagaimana penerbit berita secara sistematik mengkonstruk suatu bentuk realiti yang spesifik dalam proses pemberitaan. Apa yang cuba dimaksudkan oleh beliau „berita merupakan jendela dunia‟ ialah pengetahuan dan kefahaman seseorang lazimnya bergantung kepada laporan media meskipun berita bukan cerminan kepada realiti dunia sebenar. Hal yang sama juga mendorong saintis-saintis politik tampil dengan hujah sesiapa yang mengusai media akan memenangi pilihan raya. Perubahan mediaskap di Malaysia telah menyaksikan publik tidak lagi dikawal oleh media arus perdana, sebaliknya media sosial yang mulai diperkenalkan mulai lewat 1990-an sebagai suara alternatif kepada rakyat. Perubahan drastik mulai berlaku dengan pengenalan telefon pintar dan media sosial. Isu-isu yang terdahulunya tidak diketahui kini boleh jadi viral dalam sekelip mata. Malangnya, terdapat juga banyak berita palsu yang direka khusus untuk tujuan kempen pilihan raya disebarkan secara berleluasa. Apa yang boleh dilihat pada PRU-14 adalah pelbagai partisan, propaganda, disinformasi dan pragmatisme yang membentuk politik persepsi dalam kalangan rakyat Malaysia.

Abstract
Media plays an important role in shaping the thinking of voters. The new media has once again shown its key role in setting and shaping the public discourse for Malaysian's GE14. The media has always been the predominant source of political information for the citizens in a democratic society, although the news is not the total truth, always a blend between fact and fiction with somehow hidden agendas. Basically, most of the public does not have the real life or first-hand experience with the issues or events that have been hotly debated as public interest topics. Journalism scholars like Tuchman (1978) has continuously emphasized how newsmakers systematically construct or manufacture a specific form of social reality in the process of making the news. What he means by the news is the window of the world is most people's knowledge and understanding will be based on media reports even though the news is not a mirror of reality. The reality brought to us by the news does not necessarily reflect the reality of the real world, and yet most layman will perceive what they saw or read from the media as the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This has also prompted political scientists to suggest that whoever controls the media will win the election. The change of the Malaysian mediascape saw the public is no longer controlled by the mainstream media but instead by social media. Issues that were previously unlikely to be known now can be virally in a blink of an eye. Unfortunately, though, there is also fake news designed specifically for the election campaign. What can be seen in the GE14 is all sorts of partisanship, propaganda, disinformation and pragmatism that contributed to the politics of perception among Malaysians.

References

Alonso, R. & Camara, O. 2014. Persuading voters. USC Marshall School of Business Research Paper Series, University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, CA, USA. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/58674/1/Alonso_Camara_Persuading-voters_2014.pdf

Annabelle Lee, Mauricia Grace & Baharudin Suarnur. 2018. Malang Pitas di balik projek udang kerajaan. Laporan Khas. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/423293, 6 Mei

Asbury E.T. 2016. Natives and immigrants: Closing the digital generation gap. Dalam Attrill A., Fullwood C. (eds.). Applied cyberpsychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Balmas, M. & Sheafer, T. 2010. Candidate image in election campaigns: attribute agenda setting, affective priming, and voting intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 22(5), 1-26

Bentangkan Laporan RCI mengenai PTI di Sabah dan penyelesaiannya di Parlimen Malaysia https://www.change.org/p/najib-razak-bentangkan-laporan-rci-mengenai-pti-di-sabah-dan-penyelesaiannya-di-parlimen-malaysia

Chadwick, P. 2018. Why fake news on social media travels faster than the truth. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/19/fake-news-social-media-twitter-mit-journalism, 19 Mar

Downey, J. & Fenton, N. 2003. New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media Society. 5(2), 185-202.

Eko Prayitno Joko. 2014. Isu pemilikan wilayah Pantai Timur Sabah: Satu Penelusuran daripada sudut sumber sejarah. Jurnal Kinabalu. 20, 1-34

FMT. 2016. Penampang MP Darell Leiking quits PKR.. http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2016/09/22/darell-leiking-quits-pkr/, 22 September

Kahn, K.F. & Kenney, P.J. 1999. Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. The American Political Science Review. 93(4), 877-889.

Kenski, K. & Stroud, N.J. 2006. Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 50(2), 173-192.

Kiousis, S. & McCombs, M. 2004. Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research. 31(1), 36-57.

Lee Kuok Tiung, Ramzah Dambul, Zaini Othman, & Sulaiman Tahajuddin. 2015. Kajian Elektoral Malaysia 2015. Majlis Profesor Negara (MPN).

Lee Kuok Tiung & Sivamurugan Pandian. 2017. Kajian Pola Pengundi 2017: Persepsi Masyarakat ke atas Isu dan Kepimpinan. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Malaysia Today. 2008. Abdullah akui tewas pada pembangkang melalui siber. http://www.malaysia-today.net/2008/03/26/abdullah-akui-tewas-pada-pembangkang-melalui-siber/ , 26 Mac

McCombs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. 1972. The Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly. 36(2), 176-187.

Ramli Dollah & Mohd Zambri Suharani. 2015. Fungsi dan peranan ESSCOM dalam menjamin keselamatan Sabah: Satu perbandingan persepsi antara komuniti ‘Luar’ dan komuniti ESSZONE. Jurnal Komunikasi Borneo, 2, 1-28.

Ramli Dollah & Kamarulnizam Abdullah. 2018. The securitization of migrant workers in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of International Migration & Integration. 19(3), 17–735.

Ramzah Dambul, Marja Azlima Omar, dan Sabihah Osman. 2010. Sabah Priority Issues. Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Scheufele, D.A. & Tewksbury, D. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication. 57(1), 9-20.

Stromback, J. 2008. Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 13(3), 228-246.

Sweetser, K.D., Golan, G.J., & Wanta, W. 2008. Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication & Society. 11(2), 197-216.

Syed Umar Ariff; et. al. 2018. Parlimen: Sabah tiada dalam laporan persempadanan semula SPR? https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2018/03/402372/parlimen-sabah-tiada-dalam-laporan-persempadanan-semula-spr, 22 March

Terkildsen, N. 1993. When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science. 37(4), 1032-1053.

The Economist. 2018. Stop, thief! Malaysia’s PM is about to steal an election. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/03/10/malaysias-pm-is-about-to-steal-an-election, 10 March

Tuchman, G. 1978. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.

Utusan. 2008. Akui silap abai kempen secara siber., http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=0326&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Muka_Hadapan&pg=mh_06.htm, 26 Mac

Wan Shawaluddin Wan Hassan & Ramli Dollah. 2008. Isu-isu keselamatan di Sabah dan impak kepada Malaysia. JATI: Jurnal Jabatan Asia Tenggara Universiti Malaya, 13, 49-68.

Wan Shawaluddin Wan Hassan & Ramli Dollah. 2007. Impak kehadiran Pendatang Filipina di Kampung Air Di Sabah. Jurnal Kinabalu, 15, 89-114.

Youtube. 2018. Cambridge Analytica Uncovered: Secret Filming reveals election tricks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpbeOCKZFfQ

Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S., & Callison, C. 2004. Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to internet news reports. Communication Research 31(1), 58-81.

Zaini Othman, Eko Prayitno Joko, Ramli Dollah, Amrullah Maraining and Kim Jong Eop. 2016. Malaysia’s 13th General Election: Sabah-Barisan Nasional Fixed-Deposit State?. Southeast Asia Review, Korea, 26(3): 91-118

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Kuok Tiung, L., Idris, R. Z., & Idris, R. (2018). PROPAGANDA DAN DISINFORMASI: POLITIK PERSEPSI DALAM PILIHAN RAYA UMUM KE-14 (PRU-14) MALAYSIA: PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION: POLITICS OF PERCEPTION IN MALAYSIAN’s 14TH GENERAL ELECTION (GE-14). Jurnal Kinabalu, 171. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.vi.1648
Total Views: 2900 | Total Downloads: 3708