This is an outdated version published on 2023-12-31. Read the most recent version.

VALUE CREATION, CONSUMERS’ ACTIVE INTERVENTION AND WORKERS’ WORKING CONDITIONS: A NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE GIG ECONOMY

Authors

  • YOSUKE UCHIYAMA
  • FUMITAKA FURUOKA
  • BEATRICE LIM
  • KHAIFUL HANIM PAZIM
  • JINGYI LI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v29i.3705

Keywords:

gig economy, gig worker, platform, value creation, feedback, working conditions

Abstract

Advances in technology and the increasing number of workers who are not constrained by traditional ways of working have fuelled gig economy activity, with several online platforms and gig workers springing up around the world. On the other hand, the problematic nature of value creation in the relationship between online platforms and gig workers has become an impediment to the sustainable growth of the gig economy. Although the gig economy business model is based on a triangular relationship consisting of platforms, gig workers and consumers, there has been limited discussion of the potential for customers to influence gig economy labour relations. Therefore, this paper identified the problematic nature of value creation in the relationship between online platforms and gig workers and theoretically integrated the possibility of active consumer intervention into this issue. This paper can highlight the hitherto unfocused relationship between gig workers and consumers and provide realistic sustainability options for existing gig economy business operations. Based on a systematic literature review, this paper proposed a conceptual framework that would incorporate four items in the consumer-worker interaction: rating systems/feedback, word of mouth, gig worker’s working condition and consumers’ moral awareness. As the result of interaction, there would be two possible outcomes: Pattern A suggests that the platform may be at risk of further deterioration, whilst Pattern B suggests that the platform’s labour practices could be improved. Finally, this paper also planned a specific research design, data collection and data analysis procedures for future research. Although this paper focuses only on on-demand (offline) through app services, which is the strongest link between customers and gig workers in the gig economy, it is one of the benchmark studies to focus on consumers in the gig economy triangular relationship. This proposed conceptual framework will contribute to the observation of the potential for consumers to improve the working conditions of gig workers in the gig economy.

Author Biographies

YOSUKE UCHIYAMA

Department of East Asian Studies, 
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences,
Universiti Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

FUMITAKA FURUOKA

Asia-Europe Institute,
Universiti Malaya,
50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

BEATRICE LIM

Faculty of Business, Economics & Accountancy,
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

KHAIFUL HANIM PAZIM

Faculty of Business, Economics & Accountancy,
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

JINGYI LI

Asia-Europe Institute,
Universiti Malaya,
50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

References

Alalwan, A. A. (2020). Mobile food ordering apps: An empirical study of the factors affecting customer e-satisfaction and continued intention to reuse. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 28-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.008

Aloisi, A. (2015). Commoditized workers: Case study research on labor law issues arising from a set of on-demand/gig economy platforms. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., 37, 653.

Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149462

Baran, Paul A. (1957). Political Economy of Growth. Monthly Review Press

Barratt, T., Goods, C., & Veen, A. (2020). ‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(8), 1643-1661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x20914346

Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2021). The role of customers in the gig economy: How perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services [Article]. Service Business, 15(1), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00432-7

Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981-1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700537004

Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of mouth: Understanding and managing referral marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(3), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/096525498346658

Chappa, C., Varghese, M., & Chandler, K. (2017). Shaping the Gig Economy. Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association.

Ching, L. C., Hasan, H., & Samsuddin, J. (2018). Youth lifestyles, digital engagement and political participation as research variables – are we measuring it right? Jurnal Kinabalu, 24. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.vi.1669

Chen, B., Liu, T., Guo, L., & Xie, Z. L. (2020). The disembedded digital economy: Social protection for new economy employment in China. Social Policy & Administration, 54(7), 1246-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12603

Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). An expanded typology for classifying mixed methods research into designs. A. Tashakkori y C. Teddlie, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209-240.

De Stefano, V. (2015). The rise of the 'just-in-time workforce': On-demand work, crowd work and labour protection in the 'Gig-Economy'. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602

Donovan, S. A., Bradley, D. H., & Shimabukuro, J. O. (2016). What does the gig economy mean for workers?

Dooley, P.C. (2005). The labour theory of value. Routledge.

Engel, J. F., Kegerreis, R. J., & Blackwell, R. D. (1969). Word-of-Mouth Communication by the Innovator. Journal of Marketing, 33(3), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1248475

Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., & Piscicelli, L. (2020). An Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy. In I. Maurer, J. Mair, & A. Oberg (Eds.), Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing, 66, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20200000066005

Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03

Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72(6), 1039-1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790002

Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior [Article]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001

Gleim, M. R., Johnson, C. M., & Lawson, S. J. (2019). Sharers and sellers: A multi-group examination of gig economy workers' perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 98, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.041

Görög, G. (2018). The Definitions of Sharing Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Management, 13(2), 175-189. https://EconPapers.repec.org/ RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:175-189

Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250

Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Two Methodological Approaches to the Integration of Mixed Methods and Case Study Designs: A Systematic Review. American Behavioural Scientist, 62(7), 900-918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218772641

Healy, J., Nicholson, D., & Pekarek, A. (2017). Should we take the gig economy seriously? Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 27(3), 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048

Healy, J., Pekarek, A., & Vromen, A. (2020). Sceptics or supporters? Consumers’ views of work in the gig economy. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12157

Jaehrling, K., & Kalina, T. (2020). 'Grey zones' within dependent employment: formal and informal forms of on-call work in Germany. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 26(4), 447-463, Article 1024258920937960. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920937960

King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What We Know and Don't Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001

Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2020). Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265

Koutsimpogiorgos, N., van Slageren, J., Herrmann, A. M., & Frenken, K. (2020). Conceptualizing the gig economy and its regulatory problems. Policy and Internet, 12(4), 525-545. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.237

Kumar, V., Lahiri, A., & Dogan, O. B. (2018). A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.021

Lee, C. K. H., & Wong, A. O. M. (2021). Antecedents of consumer loyalty in ride-hailing. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 80, 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.016

Liu, X., & Wayne Xu, W. (2019). Adoption of ride-sharing apps by Chinese taxi drivers and its implication for the equality and wellbeing in the sharing economy. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17544750.2018.1524392

Marx, K. (1867). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I: The Process of Production of Capital. Giuseppe Castrovilli.

Mattick, P. (2020). Marx and Keynes: The limits of the mixed economy. New York: Pattern Books.

Minter, K. (2017). Negotiating labour standards in the gig economy: Airtasker and Unions New South Wales. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617724305

Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307

Morse, J. M., Niehaus, L., Wolfe, R. R., & Wilkins, S. (2006). The role of the theoretical drive in maintaining validity in mixed-method research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(4), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478088706070837

Nielsen, L., & McGregor, S. L. T. (2013). Consumer morality and moral norms. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(5), 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12032

Prassl, J., & Risak, M. E. (2016). Uber, Taskrabbit, & Co: Platforms as Employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 604-619.

Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: Investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.233

Ricardo, David. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. John Murray.

Roy-Mukherjee, S., & Harrison, M. (2020). The Shifting Boundaries of Capitalism and the Conflict of Surplus Value Appropriation within the Gig Economy. In (pp. 45-62). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-603-220201005

Samsuddin, J., Ching, L. C., & Hasan, H. (2019). Civic participation as a precursor to political participation: A look at Malaysian youths. Jurnal Kinabalu, 1-11.

Schlagwein, D., Schoder, D., & Spindeldreher, K. (2020). Consolidated, systemic conceptualization, and definition of the "sharing economy". Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7), 817-838. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24300

Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan.

Smith, B., Goods, C., Barratt, T., & Veen, A. (2020). Consumer “app-etite” for workers’ rights in the Australian “gig” economy. Journal of Choice Modelling, 100254. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100254

Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617722461

Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2017). The gig economy and information infrastructure: The case of the digital nomad community. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-24.

Tassinari, A., & Maccarrone, V. (2017). The mobilisation of gig economy couriers in Italy: some lessons for the trade union movement. Transfer-European Review of Labour and Research, 23(3), 353-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917713846

Witt, A., Suzor, N., & Wikström, P. (2015). Regulating ride-sharing in the peer economy. Communication Research and Practice, 1(2), 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2015.1048041

Wu, Q. J., Zhang, H., Li, Z., & Liu, K. (2019). Labor control in the gig economy: Evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 574-596, Article 0022185619854472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619854472

Published

2023-12-31

Versions

How to Cite

UCHIYAMA, Y., FURUOKA, F., LIM, B., PAZIM, K. H., & LI, J. (2023). VALUE CREATION, CONSUMERS’ ACTIVE INTERVENTION AND WORKERS’ WORKING CONDITIONS: A NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE GIG ECONOMY. Jurnal Kinabalu, 29. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v29i.3705
Total Views: 352 | Total Downloads: 61