EFFECTIVENESS AND BENEFITS OF SERVICE LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN SARAWAK

Authors

  • NICHOLAS GANI Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, 94300 Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jurnalkinabalu.v31i1.7104

Keywords:

Service learning, community engagement, qualitative research, pedagogy

Abstract

Service learning is a pedagogical approach that has been applied in educational institutions worldwide since the 1970s. Beginning 2019, service learning has been implemented under the name ‘Service Learning Malaysia – University for Society’ (or SULAM) in the Malaysian university curriculum, including in Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS). However, in general, there has been lack of research regarding the effectiveness of service learning. This paper examines UNIMAS students’ perceptions of service learning projects. It describes the results of a study conducted among 83 second year Anthropology and Sociology students to investigate the effectiveness of service learning at the university level in Malaysia. The contents of the students’ reflection papers form the qualitative data of this study, which were analysed thematically using the inductive approach. The findings of this study indicate that most students perceive service learning to be effective in that their service learning projects have mainly achieved their goals. Furthermore, there were benefits gained by both students and the community through participation in service learning activities. This study adds to the growing body of knowledge on the efficacy of service learning, and the result show that service learning should continue to be implemented in the Malaysian academic curriculum. Additionally, this research helps to fill a notable void in studies examining the effectiveness and impacts of service learning in the Malaysian university context, particularly in Sarawak.

References

Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning

affects students. Higher Education. Paper 144. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/144

Billig, S. H. (2000). The effects of service learning. Service Learning, General. Paper 42.

Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/42

Department of Higher Education Malaysia. (2019). SULAM Service Learning Malaysia –

University for Society. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Department of Higher Education Malaysia.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.

Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education.

Washington DC: Corporation for National Service.

Hanafiah, N. A. H. (2024). Integrating service learning in higher education for enhanced

environmental consciousness in Yan, Kedah. Journal of Governance and

Development, 20(2), 195-216. https://doi.org/10.32890/jgd2024.20.2.2

Hudin, N. S., Osman, J., Shokory, S. M., & Wahid, H. A. (2018). Service learning in higher

education: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.30), 474–479.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kraft, R. J. (1996). Service learning: An introduction to its theory, practice, and effects.

Education and Urban Society, 28(2), 131–159.

Mamat, M., Amran, N. N., Ismail, Z., Ibrahim, M., Ishak, H., & Baba, S. (2019). Service-

learning in Malaysia: Practice and implementation in four public universities.

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(4), 1682–1691.

McLaughlin, E. (2010). The “real world” experience: Students’ perspectives on service-

learning projects. American Journal of Business Education, 3(7), 109–117.

Md Salleh, M. S., & Mokhtar, M. (2017). Service learning: Experiences and perceptions

towards students in UTM, Malaysia. Sains Humanika, 9(1–3), 27–30.

Mohd Naufal, W. N. A. D., Syed Aris, S. R., Wahi, R., Mohamed, A. M. D., Zulkipli, Z A.,

Awang Hashim, R, Si, E. M., & Mohd Yusof, M. M. (2024) Key success factors for implementation of Service-Learning Malaysia University for Society (SULAM) projects at higher education level: Community perspectives. Asian Journal of University Education 20 (1), 152-172.

Nurhaliza, N., Rustaman, N., Purwianingsih, W., Salahuddin, S. (2024). The effectivesess of

service learning-esd content in equipping students with problem-solving skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 10 (4), 102-109.

Piper, B., DeYoung, M., & Lamsam, G. D. (2000). Student perceptions of a service-learning

experience. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64, 153–165.

Reynolds, P. (2009). Community enggagement: What’s the difference between service

learning, community service, and community-based research? Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 23(2), 3–9.

Soska, T. M., Sullivan-Cosetti, M., & Pasupuleti, S. (2010). Service learning: Community

engagement and partnership for integrating teaching, research and service. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2–3), 139–147.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation

data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

Yusof, N., Ariffin, T. F. T., Hashim, R. A., Nordin, H., & Kaur, A. (2020). Challenges of

service learning practices: Student and faculty perspectives from Malaysia. Malaysian

Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 279–309.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

GANI, N. (2025). EFFECTIVENESS AND BENEFITS OF SERVICE LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN SARAWAK . Jurnal Kinabalu, 31(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.51200/jurnalkinabalu.v31i1.7104
Total Views: 16 | Total Downloads: 13