THE MANAGEMENT OF THE LECTURERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM IN THE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN CHINA: PERIODS, CHANGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Xu Yunhong Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Rini Suryati Sulong Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Wang Huadong College of Business, Chosun University, Rep. of Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v0i0.2134

Keywords:

lecturers’ evaluation system, organizational change, university, China

Abstract

Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China 70 years ago, the Lecturers’ Evaluation System in universities in China has undergone different periods of development, including initial formation, stagnation, recovery and adjustment, standardization and construction, development and deepening, and reform of classified evaluation. Each period presents different characteristics, and there are a series of changes in the subjects, methods, standards and application of evaluation results. Colleges and universities (mainly public institutions) have actively adapted and carried out a series of changes. Colleges and university lecturers should take the opportunities and challenges brought by the reform of Lecturers’ Evaluation System, positively change their roles as educators, researchers, social service providers and cultural disseminators; actively adjust their behaviours, actively assume the organizational citizenship behaviour; improve their academic titles, and promote the level of teaching and research. From the practice and experience of the Lecturers’ Evaluation System in 40 universities piloted by the Ministry of Education, the reform of the faculty members’ evaluation system has played a positive role in guiding, demonstrating and accumulating valuable experience in promoting colleges and universities in China.

References

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 67 – 68.

Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier. The relationship between affection and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 584 – 595.

Chen Jianwen. (2009). Psychological analysis of professional behavior of the lecturers in colleges and universities. Research on Higher Engineering Education, 4, 74.

Chen Shaoyuan. (2016). Highlights the achievement of education and teaching in the lecturers’ evaluation in colleges and universities. 9 (21).

Feng Min. (2013). Analysis of the current situation and improving measures of scientific research evaluation in china’s colleges and universities. China’s Electronic Education, 6, 19 – 22.

Huang, T. Y., & Cheng, S. H. (2008). Some basic questions on the lecturers’ evaluation system. Journal of Wuhan University

(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 1, 131 – 137.

Jia Yongtang. (2012). The impact of the lecturers’ evaluation system in colleges and universities on the lecturers’ role behavior. Higher Education Research, 33 (12), 57.

Li Ming. (2014). On the evolution of the human resource management model of the lecturers in colleges and universities in China. Journal of Minnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 3.

Liu, Z. M., Wu, X. W., & Tang, Z. J. (2015). Research on Japanese new teacher evaluation system and its enlightenment. Foreign Education Research, 12, 103.

Ma Bailian. (2010). Construction of reform of scientific research evaluation system and scientific and technological innovation environment in China. Journal of Party School of Jinan Municipal Party Committee of the Communist Party of China, 4, 34 – 37.

Ma Luting. (2006). Establishing a system for the lecturers to indulge in academic work. Journal of the National College of Educational Administration, 8, 49.

Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43 – 72.

Tian Yiju. (2010). Characteristics and policy reflections on the change of the lecturers’ assessment system in colleges and

universities since the reform and opening up. Jiangsu Higher Education, 6, 76.

Tian, J., Sheng, Y. L., Yang, C. Q., & Xu, S. L. (2006). Evolution and period characteristics of the lecturers’ evaluation system in Chinese colleges and universities. Education Research of Tsinghua University, 4, 58.

Wang Danhui. (2010). Reflections on improving the performance appraisal system of the lecturers in colleges and universities. Journal of Neijiang Normal University, 5, 106 – 109.

Wang Guangyan. (2009). Research on the performance evaluation of the lecturers in colleges and universities. Shanghai: East China Normal University.

Wang, L. M., &He, X. J. (2013). Research on the classified assessment system of the lecturers in colleges and universities. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 7, 82 – 83.

Xue Jitao. (2014). Present situation and optimization of the lecturers’ performance appraisal in private colleges and universities in China – Take X University as an example. Lanzhou University of Technology.

Yu, X. B., & Liu, P. (2007). An analysis of the lecturers’ assessment system in Chinese colleges and universities. Maritime Education Research, 1.

Zheng, S. Z., & Liu, Y. X. (2018). Introducing forestry talents, are trees known? Competition for “Thesis Writers” by industry-oriented colleges is worrying. Half-Monthly Talk, 8, 4.

Published

2020-04-27

How to Cite

Yunhong, X., Sulong, R. S., & Huadong, W. (2020). THE MANAGEMENT OF THE LECTURERS’ EVALUATION SYSTEM IN THE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES IN CHINA: PERIODS, CHANGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE), (2). https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v0i0.2134
Total Views: 124 | Total Downloads: 103