SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS USING R

Authors

  • Yapp Yi Hui
  • Suddin Lada
  • Mat Salleh Ayub
  • Nor Fzlinda Fabeil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v9i1.4245

Keywords:

social entrepreneurship, bibliometric analysis, R studio, social value, innovation

Abstract

This research seeks to evaluate social entrepreneurship through bibliometric analysis. The study undertakes the effort to fully document the composition, number, trends, authorship, and source influence of knowledge as well as its growth. This research focuses on a searchable Scopus database of 245 articles that have been compiled and analyzed via R Studio from a vast number of studies over the last 17 years and are the most relevant. Preliminary findings show that between 2005 and 2022, there was a growth in the number of articles published related to social entrepreneurship. By performing a bibliometric study with R, it is possible to identify the subject's most relevant journals, authors, and publications. The study found that by condensing the most crucial elements of social entrepreneurship into a single concept, an innovative research topic can be formed, resulting in fresh research opportunities in the broad field of social entrepreneurship.

Author Biographies

Yapp Yi Hui

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy,
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400 Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

Suddin Lada

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy,
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400 Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

Mat Salleh Ayub

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy,
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400 Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

Nor Fzlinda Fabeil

Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, 
Jalan UMS, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 
88400 Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia

References

Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x

Short, J., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.69

Beugré, C. (2017). Social Entrepreneurship Managing the Creation of Social Value. Routledge, 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.05.001

Cohen, A. M., Hersh, W. R., Dubay, C., & Spackman, K. (2005). Using co-occurrence network structure to extract synonymous gene and protein names from MEDLINE abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-103

Cukier, W., Trenholm, S., Carl, D. & Gekas, G. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: A Content Analysis. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(1), 99-119. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/social-entrepreneurship-content-analysis/docview/885133692/se-2

Defourny, J & Nyssens, M. (2008) Conceptions of Social Enterprise in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences, paper and lecture at the EMES International Summer School, University of Corsica, Corte (July 3-7, 2008). http://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Fahimifar, S., Mousavi, K., Mozaffari, F., & Ausloos, M. (2022). Identification of the most important external features of highly cited scholarly papers through 3 (i.e., Ridge, Lasso, and Boruta) feature selection data mining methods: Identification of the most important external features of highly cited scholarly papers. Quality and Quantity, 3(0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01480-z.

Friedman, A. (2015). The Power of Lotka’s Law Through the Eyes of R. Romanian Statistical Review, 2, 69–77.

Hulgard, L. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship, In Hart, K., Laville, J.-L., & Cattani, D. (eds) The Human Economy, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 293-300.

Light, P. C. (2006). Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(3), 46-51.

Lockhart, J. (2015). A tree map bibliometric study of social media research from 2004 to 2014. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2014-0133

Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

Maria, B. (2017). Key Advantages & Disadvantages of Social Entrepreneurship. Medium. Retrieved from https://mbgiovanardi.medium.com/key-advantages-disadvantages-of- social-entrepreneurship-1a5eb2c354f7

Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for a definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28–39.

Maz-Machado, A., Fernández-López, S., & López-García, G. (2017). Lotka's Law and scientific productivity in Information and Communication Technologies. Information Processing & Management, 53(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.10.003

McMullen, J.S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 185-193.

Nicholls, A. (2006). Playing the field: A new approach to the meaning of social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1), 1-5.

Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The Art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717.

Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56-65.

Piccarozzi, M., Silvestri, C., & Morganti, P. (2021). Covid-19 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073791

Salameh, J. P., Bossuyt, P. M., McGrath, T. A., Thombs, B. D., Hyde, C. J., MacAskill, P., Deeks, J. J., Leeflang, M., Korevaar, D. A., Whiting, P., Takwoingi, Y., Reitsma, J. B., Cohen, J. F., Frank, R. A., Hunt, H. A., Hooft, L., Rutjes, A. W. S., Willis, B. H., Gatsonis, C., … McInnes, M. D. F. (2020). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): Explanation, elaboration, and checklist. The BMJ, 370(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2632

Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 111(3), 335–351.

Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons, 48, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006

Thompson, J. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412–431; Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338. http://doi.org/10.1108/09513550210435746

Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, web of Science, dimensions, crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

Weerawardena, J., & Sullivan Mort, G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. 92 Journal of World Business, 41, 21-35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001

Yardibi, F., Firat, M. Z., & Çetin Teke, E. (2021). Trend topics in animal science: A bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 45(5), 833–840. https://doi.org/10.3906/VET-2001-103

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Yapp Yi Hui, Suddin Lada, Mat Salleh Ayub, & Nor Fzlinda Fabeil. (2023). SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS USING R. Malaysian Journal of Business and Economics (MJBE), 10(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v9i1.4245
Total Views: 106 | Total Downloads: 124