ARE DIGITAL SPILLOVERS IMPORTANT FOR INNOVATION AND FIRM PRODUCTIVITY?  EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING SECTOR

Liew Feng Mei; Choong Chee Keong; Lau Lin Sea

doi:10.51200/mjbe.v11i2.5785

Authors

Liew Feng Mei
Choong Chee Keong
Lau Lin Sea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v11i2.5785

Keywords:

CDM model, digital spill over, firm productivity, innovation, Malaysia, manufacturing sector

Abstract

Industry 4.0 has prompted Malaysia’s manufacturing firms to enhance their innovation and technological capabilities. Digital spillovers are vital in capturing the full impact of digitalization because the externalities created by digital adoption can be spread across the entire economy. However, scarce studies have considered digital spillovers in the analysis. This research uses the sequential CDM model to examine the relationships between firm characteristics, digital spillovers, innovation and productivity of Malaysian manufacturing firms. The firm-level data that comprises 14,723 Malaysian manufacturing firms is used for data analysis. The results reveal that the firm characteristics and horizontal digital spillover positively influence innovation and firm productivity, as opposed to the backward digital spillover. On the other hand, the effects of internal and forward digital spillovers on the innovation output and firm productivity are relatively mixed. It suggests that manufacturing firms respond differently to information flows from various stakeholders on digital platforms, applying them uniquely to their production methods and business operations. The government is encouraged to support manufacturing firms, especially the SMEs, in leveraging digitalization to improve their performance and competitiveness.

Author Biographies

Liew Feng Mei

Faculty of Business and Finance,
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (Kampar).

Choong Chee Keong

Faculty of Business and Finance,
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (Kampar).

Lau Lin Sea

Faculty of Business and Finance,
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (Kampar).

References

Aghion, P., Bergeaud, A., Lequien, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). The impact of exports on innovation: Theory and evidence (p. 678). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2020). The role of R&D and knowledge spillovers in innovation and productivity. European economic review, 123, 103391.

Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairessec, J. (1998). Research, Innovation and Productivi [Ty: An Econometric Analysis at The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115-158.

Dai, X., & Sun, Z. (2021). Does firm innovation improve aggregate industry productivity? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56, 1-9.

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2021). Malaysia Digital Economy. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://v2.dosm.gov.my/portal-main/release-content/malaysia-e-commerce-income-soared-17.1-per-cent-to-rm279.0-billion-in-the-third-quarter-2021.

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2023a). Employment Statistics 2023. Retrieved Jan 14, 2024, from https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epFreeDownloadContentSearch.seam?cid=343133.

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2023b). Labour Productivity First Quarter 2023. Retrieved August 18, 2023, from https://newss.statistics.gov.my/newss-portalx/ep/epDownloadContentSearch.seam?cid=1466.

Department of Statistics Malaysia (DOSM). (2024). Economic Census History. Retrieved Jan 18, 2024, from https http://economiccensus.dosm.gov.my/ec2/index.php/en/info-banci-ekonomi/sejarah-banci.

Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2021). National Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) Policy. Putrajaya: EPU, Prime Minister's Department.

Economic Planning Unit (EPU). (2023). Socio Economic Statistics-National Accounts. Retrieved April 25 2023, from https://www.epu.gov.my/en/socio-economic-statistics/socio-economic/national-accounts.

Edeh, J. N., & Acedo, F. J. (2021). External supports, innovation efforts and productivity: Estimation of a CDM model for small firms in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121189.

Fedyunina, A., & Radosevic, S. (2022). The relationship between R&D, innovation and productivity in emerging economies: CDM model and alternatives. Economic Systems, 46(3), 100998.

Giotopoulos, I., Kritikos, A. S., & Tsakanikas, A. (2023). A lasting crisis affects R&D decisions of smaller firms: the Greek experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(4), 1161-1175.

Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford review of economic policy, 22(4), 483-498.

Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of economics, 10(1), 92-116

Gujarati, D. N. (2021). Essentials of econometrics. Sage Publications.

Han, Z., Liu, M., & Rui M. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of informatization on productivity: Mediation role of labor’s skill structure. Technology and Economy, 36(07), 56–65.

Heckman, J. (2013). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Applied Econometrics, 31(3), 129-137.

Jamrisko, M., Lu, W., & Tanzi.A., (2021, February 4). South Korea leads world in innovation as US exits top ten. Retrieved May 8, 2022, from https://themalaysianreserve.com/2021/02/04/south-korea-leads-world-in-innovation-as-us-exits-top-ten/.

Jitsutthiphakorn, U. (2021). Innovation, firm productivity, and export survival: firm-level evidence from ASEAN developing countries. Journal of Economic Structures, 10(1), 1-17.

Karhade, P., & Dong, J. Q. (2021). Information technology investment and commercialized innovation -performance: Dynamic adjustment costs and curvilinear impacts. MIS Quarterly, 45(3),1007-1024.

Khachoo, Q., Sharma, R., & Dhanora, M. (2018). Does proximity to the frontier facilitate FDI-spawned spillovers on innovation and productivity? Journal of Economics and Business, 97, 39-49.

Khalifa, A.B. (2023). Impact of research and development (R&D) and information, and communication technology (ICT) on innovation and productivity evidence from Tunisian manufacturing firms. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 31(2), 341-361.

Lee, J. W., & Song, E. (2020). Aging labor, ICT capital, and productivity in Japan and Korea. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 58, 101095.

Ma, C. A., Xiao, R., Chang, H. Y., & Song, G. R. (2022). Founder management and innovation: An empirical analysis based on the theory of planned behavior and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827448.

Mariev, O., Nagieva, K., Pushkarev, A., Davidson, N., & Sohag, K. (2022). Effects of R&D spending on productivity of the Russian firms: does technological intensity matter? Empirical Economics, 1-25.

Marsh, I. W., Rincon-Aznar, A., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2017). We see ICT spillovers everywhere but in the econometric evidence: a reassessment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(6), 1067-1088.

Mendoza, A. R. (2024). Technological Innovation, Productivity, and Global Value Chains Participation of Philippine Manufacturers. The Developing Economies.

Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry (MITI). (2018). National Industry 4.0 Policy Framework. Kuala Lumpur: MITI.

Montégu, J. P., Pertuze, J. A., & Calvo, C. (2022). The effects of importing activities on technological and non-technological innovation: evidence from Chilean firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(7), 1659-1678.

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), & Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (MASTIC). (2020). National Survey of Innovation 2018: Manufacturing and Services Sectors in Malaysia. Putrajaya: Federal Government Administrative Centre.

Ong, C. H., Tan, M. K., Lim. L. P., Tan. O. K. & Goh, C. F., (2019). Determinants of Innovative Performance in the Manufacturing Industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 9(1), 380-387.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD (2018). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy, OECD-OCDE, Paris.

Ouyang, X., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Firm Size, Radical and Incremental Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Based on The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(06). https://doi-org.libezp2.utar.edu.my/10.1142/S1363919622500438.

Paunov, C., & Rollo, V. (2016). Has the internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developing world? World Development, 78, 587-609.

Santana, S. K. S., Cavalcanti, S., & Bezerra, J. (2011). “The role of innovation in industry productivity: a sectoral approach.” Foz do Iguacu: Anaisdo 39th National Meeting of Economics, ANPEC.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press, New York.

Shafi'I, M., & Ismail, N. W. (2015). Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Firms Level Data on Malaysian Manufacturing Sector. International Journal of Economics & Management, 9(1).

Silva, A. L. (2021). Innovation in development cooperation: emerging trajectories and implications for inclusive sustainable development in the 21st century. Innovation and Development, 11(1), 151-171.

Skorupinska, A. A., & Torrent Sellens, J. (2014). ICT, innovation and productivity: evidence from Eastern European manufacturing firms (No. DWP14-003). IN3 Working Paper Series.

Udeogu, E., Amakom, U., & Roy-Mukherjee, S. (2021). Empirical Analysis of an Augmented Schumpeterian Endogenous Growth Model. Journal of Economic Development, 46(1), 53-84.

Viglioni, M. T. D., & Calegario, C. L. L. (2021). How firm size moderates the knowledge and affects the innovation performance? Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 20, 15567.

World Bank Group. (2024). World Development Indicators (Malaysia). Retrieved January 12, 2024, from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2019). Fourth Industrial Revolution. Retrieved December 3, 2019, from https://www.weforum.org/focus/fourth-industrial-revolution.

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? Geneva: Switzerland.

Xu, W., & Cooper, A. (2017). Digital Spillover: Measuring the True Impact of the Digital Economy. A Report by Huawei and Oxford Economics, Oxford, United Kingdom, https://www. oxfordeconomics. com/recentreleases/digital-spillover.

Yang, L., & Wang, S. (2022). Do fintech applications promote regional innovation efficiency? Empirical evidence from China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101258.

Yap, L. H., Ahmad, S. B., & Hoe, C. H. (2020). Organisational capability on ICT support and SMEs’ performances in malaysia. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(10), 271-282.

Younas, M. Z., & ul-Husnain, M. I. (2022). Role of market structure in firm-level innovation: an extended CDM model for a developing economy. Decision, 49(1), 91-104.

Zabłocka-Abi Yaghi, A., & Tomaszewski, T. (2024). The interdependence of R&D, innovations, and productivity: case of Polish manufacturing companies. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 23(1), 195-212.

Zhang, J., & Islam, M. S. (2022). The role of market power in driving innovation and productivity: a firm-level study of emerging ASEAN. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1865-1888.

Zhu, F., Li, Q., Yang, S., & Balezentis, T. (2021). How ICT and R&D affect productivity? Firm level evidence for China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja,1-19.