REMUNERATION COMMITTEE DIVERSITY AND EXCESS CEO PAY: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF FAMILY OWNERSHIP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/mjbe.v12i2.7083Keywords:
Malaysia, Remuneration Committee Diversity, Agency Theory, Family Ownership, Excess CEO PayAbstract
This study examined how remuneration committee diversity influences their perspectives, which, in turn, influences excess CEO pay using an unbalanced panel of 3,290 public listed firms in Malaysia (2017-2021). The study also explored whether family ownership played a moderating role in this relationship between committee diversity and excess CEO pay. Using an index based on demographic characteristics (gender, age, ethnicity) and cognitive characteristics (education backgrounds, financial expertise, multiple directorship), the study found that aggregate measures better capture diversity than individual attributes. Findings indicated diverse committees exercise greater restraint regarding excess CEO pay, while family ownership reinforces oversight roles, addressing literature gaps across developed and emerging economies. Furthermore, the association between remuneration committee diversity and excess CEO pay was strengthened by family ownership, mitigating type 2 agency conflicts. The study contributes significant influence of a country’s institutional setting on the monitoring effectiveness of remuneration committee diversity which contributes to the ongoing discussion on excessive CEO pay.
References
Ahmed, A., Atif, M., & Gyapong, E. (2021). Boardroom gender diversity and CEO pay deviation: Australian evidence. Accounting & Finance, 61(2), 3135–3170. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12696
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Baker, Kent, H., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 108, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
Baranchuk, N., & Dybvig, P. H. (2009). Consensus in Diverse Corporate Boards. Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 715–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn052
Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Yonker, S. (2018). Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(3), 588–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.12.009
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
CG Monitor 2019. (2019). Corporate Governance Monitor 2019. Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/corporate-governance
Cheng, M., Lin, B., & Wei, M. (2015). Executive compensation in family firms: The effect of multiple family members. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.014
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(00)00067-2
Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., Ellstrand, A. E., & Dalton, D. R. (1998). Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of Ceo Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.5465/257103
D’Este, C., & Carabelli, M. (2022). Family ownership and risk: The role of family managers. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(6), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2021-0338
Fernández-Temprano, M. A., & Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2020). Types of director, board diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0096
Fong, E. A., Misangyi, V. F., & Tosi, H. L. (2010). The effect of CEO pay deviations on CEO withdrawal, firm size, and firm profits. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.827
He, L., & Fang, J. (2016). CEO Overpayment and Dismissal: The Role of Attribution and Attention. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12129
Heron, R. A., & Lie, E. (2007). Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants? Journal of Financial Economics, 83(2), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.12.003
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
Jong, L., & Ho, P.-L. (2019). Family directors, independent directors, remuneration committee and executive remuneration in Malaysian listed family firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 28(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-04-2019-0099
Li, Y., Clements, M., Padgett, C., & Zhang, X. (2023). Does the age of compensation committee members matter for CEO compensation? Corporate Governance: An International Review, corg.12560. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12560
Liew, C. Y., Ko, Y., Song, B. L., & Murthy, S. T. (2022). Directors’ compensation, ownership concentration and the value of the firm: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 49(1), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00210-8
Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance. (2017). Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG). Securities Commission Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/regulation/corporate-governance
Malhotra, S., Shen, W., & Zhu, P. (2021). A vicious cycle of symbolic tokenism: The gendered effects of external board memberships on chief executive officer compensation. Human Resource Management, 60(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22055
Saona, P., Muro, L., San Martín, P., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Board of Director’s Gender Diversity and its impact on earnings management: An empirical analysis for select european firms. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(4), 634–663. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.9381
Securities Commission of Malaysia. (2021). Corporate Governance Strategic Priorities 2021-2023. Securities Commission of Malaysia. https://www.sc.com.my/api/documentms/download.ashx?id=b8554e62-a209-4af1-ad04-33258aa49136
Tee, C. M. (2021). Executive directors’ pay-performance link and board diversity: Evidence from high free cash flow and low-growth firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-11-2020-1379
Tee, C. M., & Kasipillai, J. (2022). Female directors’ monitoring and earnings quality: The moderating effect of political connections and family ownership. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1085–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2021-0101
The Star. (2019, June 19). Genting boss tells shareholders he’s taking a pay cut. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/06/19/genting-boss-tells-shareholders-hes-taking-a-pay-cut
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Wang, H.-D., Lin, C.-H., & Cho, C.-C. (2020). The dark and bright sides of agency problems: Evidence from insider compensation of family pyramidal firms. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(3), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.09.001
Zulfiqar, M., & Hussain, K. (2020). Ceo Compensation and firm innovation: Moderating role of ownership concentration. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(06), 2050058. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500589
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 © Universiti Malaysia Sabah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

CCBY (Attribution)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
© Universiti Malaysia Sabah 2025
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, stored in a database or retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, graphic, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Universiti Malaysia Sabah Press, except as permitted by Act 332, Malaysian Copyright Act of 1987. Permission of rights is subjected to the journal.