A comparative analysis of the effect of low-cost fish and commercially compounded feed on growth performance and organoleptic quality of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × Epinephelus lanceolatus) in cage farming in Kuala Penyu, Sabah, and nutritional costs

Wei Kang Chor; Victor Charlie Andin; Chitra Devi Gopalakrishnan; Amierah Amer; Shaheera Mohamed; Hiroyoshi Matsumoto; Leong Seng Lim

doi:10.51200/bjomsa.v4i1.2049

Authors

Wei Kang Chor WWF
Victor Charlie Andin
Chitra Devi Gopalakrishnan
Amierah Amer
Shaheera Mohamed
Hiroyoshi Matsumoto
Leong Seng Lim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/bjomsa.v4i1.2049

Keywords:

Hybrid grouper, Forage fish, Commercial feed, Growth performance, Organoleptic quality, Feed cost

Abstract

A 25-week feeding trial was conducted to assess the growth performance, organoleptic quality, and to estimate the viability of nourishing hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus x Epinephelus lanceolatus) with low-cost fish (LCF) and commercially compound feed (CCF). A group of 3600 juvenile fish (182g) were released in four sea cages and fed with either LCF or CCF in duplicate. At the end of the trial, the hybrid grouper provided LCF attained a significantly higher (P<0.05) final body weight (971.00±24.04g) than those fed with CCF (838.50±17.68g). While the estimated feed cost of hybrid grouper fed with LCF (RM7.84 ± 0.45) was lower than those fed with CCF (RM9.28 ± 0.37), no significant difference was found in the fish survival and there was no clear bias in consumer preferences for either fish fed with LCF or CCF (P>0.05). Although technicalities of fish fed with LCF suggest that LCF is more efficient than CCF, feeding LCF to high-value fish is an unsustainable practice as LCF is usually obtained through trawling – a destructive fishing method for the marine ecosystem. Therefore, feeding with CCF without the use of LCF as the source of protein for its fishmeal will contribute to sustainable aquaculture. In order to convince the local farmers in Sabah to adopt the practice of feeding CCF, future research should focus on completing the species-specific diet formulation to promote optimum growth, and find ways to reduce the CCF local selling price.

References

Bunlipatanon, P., Songseechan, N., Kongkeo, H., Abery, N.W. & De Silva. S.S. (2014). Comparative efficacy of trash fish versus compounded commercial feeds in cage aquaculture of Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer) (Bloch) and tiger grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus) (Forsskål). Aquaculture Research 45(3), 373-388.

Can, M. F., Günlü, A. & Can, H.Y. (2015). Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it. Food Science and Technology 35(2), 339-246. Chan, J. (2019). Sabah government to ban fishing trawlers in bid to protect environment. Malaymail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/ malaysia/2019/09/03/sabah-govt-to-ban-fishing-trawlers-in-bid-to-protect-environment/1786848

Ching, F.F., Mohamad, N.Z.S., Shapawi, R., Shaleh, S.R.M., Othman, R., Ajuh, M. & Senoo, S. (2019). Comparison on growth performance and organoleptic quality of hybrid grouper fed with prey fish and formulated feed. In: Abstract Book of International Conference on Marine Science and Aquaculture 2019 – Marine Biodiversity for Sustainable Management of Aquaculture and Ecosystem Services, Kota Kinabalu, pp 63. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia.

Ch’ng, C.L. & Senoo, S. (2008). Egg and larval development of a new hybrid grouper, tiger grouper Epinephelus fuscoguttatus x giant grouper E. lanceolatus. Aquaculture Science 56, 505–512.

Department of Fisheries Sabah - DoFS. (2018). Annual fisheries statistics for 2018. Kota Kinabalu. Department of Fisheries Sabah - DoFS. Department of Fisheries Malaysia - DoFM. (2018). Annual fisheries statistics for 2017. Kuala Lumpur. https://www.dof.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/3343 (Downloaded at 14 August 2019).

Dodge, Y. (2008). The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. Springer, 432pp. New York.

Egan, H., Kirk, R.S., Sawyer, R. & Pearson, D. (1981). Pearson's Chemical Analysis of Foods. 8th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 591 pp. Edinburgh, New York.

Fisheries Research Institute – FRI (2017). Fisheries Resources Survey in Malaysia Waters 2013-2016: executive summary. Department of Fisheries Malaysia - DoFM. Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia.

Fountoulaki, E., Vasilaki, A., Hurtado, R., Grigorakis, K., Karacostas, I., Nengas, I., Rigos, G., Kotzamanis, Y., Venou, B. & Alexis, M.N. (2009). Fish oil substitution by vegetable oils in commercial diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.); effects on growth performance, flesh quality and fillet fatty acid profile: Recovery of fatty acid profiles by a fish oil finishing diet under fluctuating water temperatures. Aquaculture 289, 317-326.

Gomez, D.K., Mori, K., Okiyana, Y., Nakai, T, Park, S. C. (2010). Trash fish can be a source of betanodavirus for cultured marine fish. Aquaculture 302, 158-163.

Hasan, M.R. (2017). Feeding Global Aquaculture Growth. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations- FAO.

Hua, K., Cobcroft, J.M., Cole, A., Condon, K., Jerry, D.R., Mangott., A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M.J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K., and Strugnell, J.M. (2019). The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1(3), 316-329.

Kim, D.H. (2015). Low-value fish used as feed is a source of disease in farmed fish. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 18, 203-209.

Lajimin, S., Abd Razak, A., Denil, D.J., Ransangan, J., Abdul Wahid, M.E., Sade, A. (2015). First detection of Megalocytivirus (Iridoviridae) in trash fish used for aquaculture feed in Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Aquatic Science 6, 54-66.

Ng, X.K. (2017). Consultancy for case study of aquaculture in Peninsular Malaysia: Comparison between Aquaculture Improvement Project Farms and Non-Aquaculture Improvement Project farms. WWF Technical Report. World Wildlife Fund Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Rachmansyah, Usman, Palinggi, N.N. & Williams, K. (2009). Formulated feed for tiger grouper grow-out. In: Aquaculture Asia Magazine Vol. XIV No. 2 April-June 2009 (S. Wilkinson, ed.), pp 30-36. Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia–Pacific (NACA), Bangkok, Thailand.

Rimmer, M.A., Sudja, W., Indradjaja, D.D., Giri, N.A. & Laining, A. (2016). Compound feed for grouper aquaculture-why has adoption been poor? AQUA Culture Asia Pacific Magazine 12, 25-28.

Sim, S.Y., Rimmer, M.A., Williams, K., Toledo, J.D., Sugama, K., Rumengan, I. & Philips, M.J. (2005). A Practical Guide to Feeds and Feed Management for Cultured Groupers. NACA, 25 pp. Bangkok, Thailand.

Shapawi, R., Mustafa, S. & Ng, W.K. (2011). A comparison of the growth performance and body composition of the humpback grouper, Cromileptes altivelis fed on farm-made feeds, commercial feeds or trash fish. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 6, 523-534.

Shapawi, R. Ching, F.A., Senoo, S. & Mustafa, S. (2018). Nutrition, growth and resilience of tiger grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus) x giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) hybrid-a review. Reviews in Aquaculture.

Sullivan, D.M. & Carpenter, D.E. (1993). Methods of Analysis for Nutrition Labeling. AOAC International, 624pp. Arlington VA.

Tacon, A.G.J., Rausin, N., Kadari, M. & Cornelis, P. (1991a). The food and feeding of marine in floating cages at the National Sea-farming Development Centre, Lampung, Indonesia: rabbitfish, Siganus canaliculatus (Park). Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 21, 375–390.

Tacon, A.G.J., Rausin, N., Kadari, M. & Cornelis, P. (1991b). The food and feeding of tropical marine fishes in floating net cages: Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), and brown spotted grouper, Epinephelus tauvina (Forskal). Aquaculture and Fisheries Management 22, 165–182.

Turchini, G.M. and Trushenski, J.T. (2018). Thoughts for the future of aquaculture nutrition: realigning perspectives to reflect contemporary issues related to judicious use of marine resources in aquafeeds. American Fisheries Society 81(1) , 13-39