FAKTOR KELUARGA DAN SEKOLAH TERHADAP MURID BERISIKO CICIR: KESAHAN DAN KEBOLEHPERCAYAAN INSTRUMEN

Authors

  • Annie Jerry Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Mohd Muslim Md Zalli Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/sapj.v12i2.5627

Keywords:

Murid Berisiko Cicir, Keluarga, Sekolah, Analisis Penerokaan Faktor

Abstract

Isu keciciran pendidikan memberi impak negatif kepada individu, keluarga, masyarakat dan negara. Bagi memahami fenomena ini, menjadi satu keperluan untuk mendalami punca yang menyebabkan individu mengambil keputusan untuk berhenti sekolah. Namun begitu, instrumen yang mengukur pengaruh persekitaran keluarga dan sekolah dalam konteks Malaysia adalah masih terhad. Oleh itu objektif kajian ini adalah untuk menilai aspek kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan bagi instrumen faktor persekitaran keluarga dan sekolah terhadap murid berisiko cicir telah dijalankan ke atas 110 orang murid sekolah menengah berisiko cicir yang berumur 16 tahun. Dalam kajian ini, satu set soal selidik telah diadaptasi dan diubahsuai mengikut konteks Malaysia. Soal selidik ini telah melalui proses terjemahan back-to-back, kesahan kandungan, kesahan muka dan kesahan konstruk. Kesahan konstruk diperoleh melalui pelaksanaan Analisis Penerokaan Faktor (Exploratory Factor Analysis, EFA) menggunakan perisian IBM-SPSS versi 26. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan ujian Bartlett adalah signifikan dan nilai Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin adalah melebihi 0.6. Jumlah keseluruhan item pada awalnya adalah 16 item, setelah prosedur EFA dijalankan 14 item dikekalkan manakala dua item digugurkan kerana nilai faktor muatan yang rendah. Nilai Alpha Cronbach bagi semua konstruk adalah melebihi 0.7. Melalui dapatan kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa item yang terdapat dalam instrumen faktor persekitaran keluarga dan sekolah dapat diukur dan sesuai digunakan untuk menjawab objektif kajian. Oleh itu, instrumen untuk mengukur faktor persekitaran keluarga dan sekolah dalam kalangan murid berisiko cicir dapat diaplikasikan dalam kajian seterusnya. 

References

Aldrige, J., & Ala’I, K. (2013). Assessing students’ views of school climate: Developing and validating the What’s Happening in This School (WHITS) questionnaire. Improving Schools, 16(1), 47-66.

Awang Hashim, R., Hock, E. L., Jafar, M. F., Shanmugam, S. K. S., & Bukhari, N. (2024). Statistical identification of predictors of dropout in secondary education: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2024.2306673

Awang, Z., Hui, L. S., & Zainudin, N. F. S. (2018). Pendekatan mudah SEM

structural equation modelling. MPWS Rich Resources Sdn. Bhd.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844.

Carlotta, F. C. C., Allen, J., & Henry, D. (2014). The brief family relationship scale: A brief measure of the relationship dimension in family functioning. Assessment, 21(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111425856

Chung, J.Y. & Lee, S. (2019). Dropout early warning systems for high school students using machine learning. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.030.

Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2021). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

De Coninck, D., Clycq, N., & Van Praag, L. (2023). School staff’s view on causes of early school leaving in regular secondary and adult education: Identifying the role of individual, job related and school climate characteristics. British Educational Research Journal, 50, 753-771. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3948

Dharmalingam, G. M., & Rajanthiran, S. P. (2019). Implikasi status sosioekonomi keluarga dan persekitaran terhadap keciciran murid India: Kajian kes di Puchong. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(33), 284-297.

Eisele, G., Vachon, H., Lafit, G., Kuppens, P., Houben, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W. (2022). The effects of sampling frequency and questionnaire length on perceived burden, compliance, and careless responding in experience sampling data in a student population. Assessment, 29(2), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120957102

Gage, N. A., Larson, A., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2015). The Meriden school climate survey student version: Preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41(2), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508415596960

Gardner, D. L., Huber, C. H., Steiner, R., Vazquez, L. A., & Savage, T. A. (2008). The development and validation of the Inventory of Family Protective Factors: A brief assessment for family counseling. The Family Journal, 16(2), 107–117.

Gil, A. J., Antelm-Lanzat, A. M., Cacheiro-González, M. L., & Pérez-Navío,E. (2020). The effect of family support on student engagement: Towards the prevention of dropouts. Psychology in the Schools, 58(6), 1082- 1095.https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22490

Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2021). School Climate Research: Italian Adaptation and Validation of a Multidimensional School Climate Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39(3), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282920967141

Greer, W., Clark-Louque, A., Balogun, A., & Clay, A. (2022). Race-neutral doesn’t work: Black males’ achievement, engagement, and school climate perceptions. Urban Education, 57(7), 1259-1287.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate analysis (8th ed.). Annabel Ainscow.

Huang, Y., & McKeown, S. (2022). Examining the association between family environment and adolescent delinquent behaviors in China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31, 2871-2884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02348-4

Kalkan, F., & Dagh, E. (2021). The relationship between school climate, school belonging, and school burnout according to the views of secondary school students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.878682

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Bilangan 4 Tahun 2018. Garis panduan mengurus murid berisiko cicir di sekolah. https://www.moe.gov.my/pekeliling/1935----surat-pekeliling-ikthisas bilangan-4-tahun-2018-garis-panduan-mengurus-muridberisiko-cicir di-sekolah/file

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2022). Laporan Tahunan 2022 Pelan Pembangunan Malaysia 2013-2025.

Koc, M., Zorbaz, O., & Demirtas-Zorbaz, S. (2020). Has the ship sailed? The causes and consequences of school dropout from an ecological viewpoint. Social Psychology of Education, 23(5), 1149-1171.

Lawrence, C. K., & Adebowale, T. A. (2022). Adolescence dropout risk predictors: Family structure, mental health and self-esteem. Journal Community Psychology, 5(1), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22884

Lawson, H. A., & Lawson, M. A. (2020). Student engagement and disengagement as a collective action problem. Education Sciences, 10(8), 212.

McCubbin, H. I., Patterson, J. M., & Wilson, L. R. (2013). Family inventory of life events and changes. In Handbook of measurements for marriage and family therapy (pp. 194-198). Routledge.

Molinari, L., & Grazia, V. (2023). A multi-informant study of school climate: student, parent and teacher perceptions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38, 1403-1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00655-4

Mihic, J., Skinner, M., Novak, M., Ferić, M., & Kranželić, V. (2022). The importance of family and school protective factors in preventing the risk behaviors of youth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1630.

Morshidi, N., & Jusoh, A. J. (2019). Konsep murid berisiko cicir (mbc) di sekolah. In Mohd Hussin, A. B., Abdul Kadir, R., Zakaria, N. S., Harun, M. M., Subarimaniam, N., Ismail, A., & Jailani, O. (Eds.), Prosiding Konvensyen Kaunseling Kebangsaan Kali ke 21, Pendayaupayaan Kendiri Melalui Kaunseling (ms. 260-275). Perkama International.

Pedditzi, M. L., Fadda, R., & Lucarelli, L. (2022). Risk and protective factors associated with student distress and school dropout: A Comparison between the Perspectives of Preadolescents, Parents, and Teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), 12589, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912589

Pesuruhjaya Undang-Undang Malaysia. (2006). Akta 611: Akta kanak-kanak 2001. Pencetakan Nasional Malaysia Bhd.

Sacco, C., & le Rose, G. (2022). Network analysis of early school dropouts’ risk factors in Italy. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021

Serna, C., & Martínez, I. (2019). Parental involvement as a protective factor in school adjustment among retained and promoted secondary students. Sustainability, 11(24), 7080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247080

Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2000). Family assessment measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 190-210.

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2022). Where are we on education recovery. Diakses daripada https://www.unicef.org/reports/where-are-we-on-education

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner's guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.

Zakari, N., Abd Majid, M. Z., & Hussin, M. (2022). Keciciran murid sekolah di Malaysia: Suatu pemerhatian awal. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i2.1288

Published

2024-12-11
Total Views: 51 | Total Downloads: 34