TINDAKAN KOLEKTIF DAN KESATUAN SEKERJA: ANALISIS KAJIAN LEPAS

COLLECTIVE ACTION AND TRADE UNIONS: AN ANALYSIS ON PREVIOUS RESEARCH

Authors

  • NASSIAH GAONG
  • MAHADIRIN AHMAD
  • KEE Y. SABARIAH KEE MOHD YUSSOF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v28i1.2507

Keywords:

kesatuan sekerja , tindakan kolektif , amalan perburuhan, perubahan ekonomi, struktur pekerjaan, kebajikan pekerja, trade unions, collective action, labor practices, economic change, job structure, employee welfare

Abstract

Tindakan kolektif merupakan sebarang jenis tindakan yang dilakukan secara bersama oleh kesatuan sekerja bagi mencapai matlamat serta memperbaiki terma dan kondisi pekerjaan di tempat kerja. Tindakan kolektif yang berjaya akan dapat menghasilkan insentif bagi kepentingan para pekerja khususnya dari aspek ekonomi dan sosial pekerja. Sehubungan dengan itu, objektif artikel ini adalah bertujuan untuk menghuraikan konsep dan kepentingan tindakan kolektif melalui perspektif para sarjana terhadap kesatuan sekerja pada masa ini. Selain itu, berdasarkan analisis kajian lepas, perjuangan terhadap upah dan kebajikan pekerja merupakan antara isu yang kerap dibincangkan dalam perundingan bersama dengan pihak majikan. Walau bagaimanapun, perubahan ekonomi dan struktur pekerjaan pada hari ini telah menyebabkan berlakunya perubahan tindakan kolektif pekerja. Keadaan ini menyebabkan kesatuan sekerja berada pada tahap “labour quiescence”. Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, kajian ini menegaskan bahawa kebajikan para pekerja akan lebih terpelihara jika mereka bersatu padu dan bergerak secara kolektif. Dengan itu, kajian lanjut perlu dilakukan bagi mengenal pasti aspek tindakan kolektif dan kepelbagaiannya pada masa kini.

 

Collective action is an action done by a company and it’s carried out together with a trade unions to achieve goals and to improve the terms and conditions of employment in a workplace. A successful collective action will be able to generate/produce incentives for the benefit of employees, especially from the economic and social aspects of employees. Thus the objective of this article is to elaborate on the concept and importance of collective action through the perspective of scholars on current/nowadays trade unions. Not to forget, this paper will also be based on the analysis of previous studies/research, in which this paper will touch about the struggle for wages and employee welfare whom was one of the issues that are often discussed in consultation/negotiation with the employers. However, the changes in today’s/nowadays economy and employment structure have led to changes in the collective actions of workers. This situation have caused trade unions to be at the level of “labor quiescence”. Based on the analysis, this study asserts that, the welfare of employees will be better protected if they are united and move collectively. Therefore, further research needs to be done to identify the aspects of the current collective action and its diversity

Author Biographies

NASSIAH GAONG

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,

Universiti Malaysia Sabah,

Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

MAHADIRIN AHMAD

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,

Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS,

88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

KEE Y. SABARIAH KEE MOHD YUSSOF

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,

Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS,

88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah

References

A.M.R.B. Masli & K.Y.S.K.M. Yussof. (2019). Hubungan antara pendekatan

pengurusan konflik, persepsi sokongan organisasi dan emotional labor: Satu

ulasan literatur: The relationship between conflict management, perceived

organizational supports and emotional labor: A review of literature. Jurnal

Kinabalu, 25.

Anne, N.C. (2009). The transformation of human resource management and industrial

relations in Vietnam. A volume in Chandos Asian Studies Series. Chandos

Publishing.

Anuradha, M.V. (2011). Unionism as collective action: Revisiting Klandermans

theory. JSTOR Journal, 46 (3).

Blake, D. R. et al. (2017). Addressing conflict through collective action in natural

resource management. International Journal of the Commons, 11 (2), 877-906.

Booth, A.L. (2001). Trade unions, economic behavior of. International of the social

and behavioral science. Colchester: University of Essex. 15807-15813.

Botha, M.M & Lephoto, M. (2017). An employer’s recourse to lock-out and

replacement labour: An evaluation of recent case law. Journal Law

Publications, 20, 1-31.

Chan, C.K. (2013). Contesting class organization: Migrant workers ‘strikes in China’.

international labor and working-class history. JSTOR Journal, 83, (Special

Issue). Strikes and Social Conflicts, 112-136.

Cleven, T. S. (2017). Collective action and globalization: Building and mobilizing

labour power. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59 (4), 397-419.

Congleton, R. D. (2015). Logic of collection action. Springer Stable, 164 (3), 217-234.

D. Ibrahim. (2016). Pergerakan kesatuan sekerja di Sabah pada era Malaysia hingga

tahun 1999. Jurnal Kinabalu, 18, 1-17.

Dagmar Schiek. (2020). Collective bargaining and unpaid care as a social security

risk an EU perspective. European and Transnational Studies, 8 (1).

Dam Manh Long. (2016). The difference in economic systems in capitalist and

communist countries. Centria University of Applied Sciences.

Esteban, J., & Ray, D. (2001). Collective action and the group size paradox. The

American Political Science Review, 95 (3), 663-672.

Fantasia, R., Voss, K., & Eidlin, B. (2013). Labor movement. The Wiley-Blackwell

Encyclopedia of social and political movements. London: Blackwell

Publishing.

Hannah Johnston & Chris Land-Kazlauskas. (2019). Organizing on-demand:

Representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy.

International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland.

Hoque, K. et al. (2017). Union representation, collective voice and job quality: An

analysis of a survey of union members in the UK finance sector. Economic

and Industrial Democracy: An International Journal, 38 (1), 27-50.

K.Y.S.K.M. Yussof & Husna Johari. (2014). Pendekatan pengurusan konflik dan

hubungannya dengan amalan interest based bargaining (IBB): Kajian ke atas

pemimpin kesatuan sekerja sektor perindustrian di Sabah. Journal of Techno-

Social, 6 (2), 63-80.

K.Y.S.K.M. Yussof & M. Ahmad. (2010). Faktor-faktor keahlian dalam Sabah

Banking Employees Union (SBEU). Teks dalam buku.

Keller, B. (2020). Employment relations without collective bargaining and strikes:

The unusual case of civil servants in Germany. Journal of Industrial Relations,

, 1-2: 110-133.

Kelly, J. (2015). The economic and labour relations review. Sage Journal, 26 (4).

Klaus Schoemann. (2018). Digital technology to support the trade union movement.

Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 67-82.

Leon, T. (2008). The communist manifesto and its relevance for today. Australia:

Resistance.

M. Ahmad, K.Y.S.K.M. Yussof & N.S. Zakaria. (2019). Dasar perburuhan dan

impaknya terhadap pergerakan kesatuan sekerja di Malaysia: Satu kajian awal.

Journal of Borneo Social Transformation Studies, 5 (1).

M. Ahmad. (2018). Perkembangan dan peranan mogok di Malaysia: Satu kajian awal.

Jurnal Kajian Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6 (2).

Mark, A.T. (2018). Takeover defense, collective action and the top management team.

Journal Emerald Insight, 41 (12).

Olson Mancur. (1971) The logic of collective action: Public good and the theory of

group. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Pang N., Pei, D., & Goh. (2012). Are we all here for the same purpose? social media

and individualized collective action. Online Information Review, 40 (4),

-559.

Reshef.Y. (2004). A theory of union collective action. Journal of Labor Research,

, 623-644.

Rhinehart, L. (2019). Let’s not forget unions and collective action when discussing

victories on workers’ rights. Economy Policy Institute.

Rudra, Sil. (2017). The battle over flexibilization in post-communist transitions: Labor

politics in Poland and the Czech Republic, 1989–2010. Journal of Industrial

Relations, 59 (4), 420-443.

S.B. Usman & K.Y.S.K.M. Yussof. (2020). Perilaku membisu dalam kalangan

penguatkuasa di sektor awam terpilih. e-Bangi, 17 (6).

Schmalz, S & Thiel, M. (2017). G Metall’s comeback: Trade union renewal in times

of crisis. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59 (4), 465-486.

Schmick, E. (2018). Collective action and the origins of the American labor

movement. The Journal of Economic History, 78 (3), 744-784.

Teri, L.C & Ford, M. (2017). Institutions and collective action in divided labour

movements: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 59

(4), 444-464.

Thomson, S. (2020). The unlikeliest of unions: Conservatives look to make allies in

the labour movement. National Post. Canada. University Press on Behalf of

International Labor. International Labor and Working-Class History.

Vandalae, K. (2011). Sustaining or abandoning ‘social peace’? strike development

and trends in Europe since the 1990. Brussels: ETUI AISBL.

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

NASSIAH GAONG, MAHADIRIN AHMAD, & KEE Y. SABARIAH KEE MOHD YUSSOF. (2022). TINDAKAN KOLEKTIF DAN KESATUAN SEKERJA: ANALISIS KAJIAN LEPAS: COLLECTIVE ACTION AND TRADE UNIONS: AN ANALYSIS ON PREVIOUS RESEARCH. Jurnal Kinabalu, 28, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v28i1.2507
Total Views: 898 | Total Downloads: 1272