PAROCHIALISM AND ITS IMPACT ON MALAYSIAN PUBLIC SERVICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jurnalkinabalu.v31i1.7118Keywords:
Parochial, government, public service, civil servant, public policyAbstract
Parochialism is an important mechanism that determines the measure of loyalty and obedience of a civil servant to the government organization. Thus, the ability of the head of an organization in the public sector to instil parochial characteristics in a civil servant is the most important value in forming a certain set of thoughts in a civil servant. Basic courses in public sector services and staffing are among examples of useful tools for forming a parochial mind set. Apart from that, the emphasis on commitment and loyalty to the head of government and state is a form of aspiration that is useful in determining how a civil servant carries out his functions and at the same time obeys the head of government and the head of state. Public policies and regulations related to the way a civil servant carries out his duties are the most important channels that can be used by the head of a government agency to instil parochial values and norms in a civil servant. This will allow the head of the organization to form a big picture of the duties and responsibilities of a civil servant in the workplace environment and in making the process of service delivery to the public a success. Thus, parochial as a characteristic in a person can be identified through the way of working, the approach chosen to lead the group in the organization, the thinking and decision-making and subsequent influence in creating a work culture guided by the individual leader concerned.
References
Abbo, U., & Bashir, A. (2020). Parochial political culture and the squabbles for national agenda setting in Nigeria: A theoretical overview.
Abd Manaf, A. (2023). Public sector governance and ethical leadership in a developing country context. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(1), 12-25.
Abd Manaf, N. H. (2017). Civil service system in Malaysia. In public administration in Southeast Asia (pp. 211-235). Routledge.
Abd Manaf, Z. (2017). Bureaucracy and administrative reform in Malaysia: A historical perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(1), 1-15.
Abdul Hamid, N. M., & Yusof, S. (2023). The historical legacy of May 13 and its impact on Malaysian public sector culture. Journal of Malaysian Studies, 18(2), 20-35.
Abdul Karim, M. R. (1995). Improving the efficiency of the public sector: A case study of Malaysia, Twelfth Meeting of Experts on the United Nations Programme in Public Administration and Finance. 31 July – 11 August 1995, New York.
Abdullah Sanusi, A. (1997). Public administration reform in Malaysia: A developing country perspective, Proceedings of the Governance: Promoting Sound Development Management Seminar, Fukuoka, 10 May 1997
Abdullah, A. (2024). Organizational culture and its impact on employee cohesion in the public sector. Journal of Public Service Management, 10(2), 45-60.
Abdullah, M. S. B. (2024). The Relationship Between Organizational Culture, Employee Performance, Leadership, And Employee Career Development in Islamic Malaysian.
Abdullah, N. H., Rahman, S. A., & Omar, A. B. (2025). Evidence and decision-making in public policies: A qualitative analysis from the perspective of the policymakers in Malaysia. Journal of Public Administration, 15(1), 1-15.
Abdullah, S., Ali, H., & Karim, M. (2025). The role of meta-synthesis in informing public sector reforms in Malaysia. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 45-60.
Abney, G., & Lauth, T. P. (1988). Parochialism in the state appropriations process. State & Local Government Review, 113-118.
Ahmad, Z., & Omar, H. (2024). The role of traditional values in shaping Malaysian public service culture. Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 56-70.
Arifin, A., & Ahmad, S. F. (2016). Pengurusan integriti di sektor awam: Cabaran dan hala tuju. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Arifin, M. A. M., & Ahmad, A. H. (2016). Kepentingan budaya integriti dan etika kerja dalam organisasi di Malaysia: Suatu tinjauan umum. Geografia, 12(9).
Asim, M. (2001). Adopting quality management concepts in public service reforms: the case of the Malaysian Public Service.
Azman, A., & Zainal, M. (2023). The New Economic Policy and its enduring influence on Malaysian civil service composition. Journal of Ethnic Relations and Public Policy, 6(1), 1-15.
Bani, R., & Mohd Hassan, M. S. (2023). Colonial legacy and bureaucratic structure: A study of Malaysian public administration. Journal of Southeast Asian Public Policy, 8(1), 45-60.
Bowornwathana, B., & Poocharoen, O. (2021). The effects of political influence on civil service neutrality in Southeast Asia. Journal of Southeast Asian Public Administration, 5(1), 1-15.
Bowornwathana, B., & Poocharoen, O. O. (2005). Managing reforms: The politics of organizing reform work. Public organization review, 5, 233-247.
Chin, T. A., & Ramasamy, S. (2022). The impact of parochialism on public policy implementation in Malaysia. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 5(3), 56-68.
Cigler, B. A. (1990). Government and politics: The American political system. Houghton Mifflin.
Cigler, B. A. (1990). Public administration and the paradox of professionalization. Public administration review, 50(6), 637.
Clemmens D. (2003). Adolescent Motherhood. A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies, MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs., 28 (2), 93–99.
Collins, B. (2022). The psychology of obedience in organizational settings. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 34-45.
Collins, B., & Medrano, A. (2022). From parochial to policy advocate: Examining policy advocacy among neighbourhood councils in Los Angeles. Cities, 130, 103882.
Embi, M. A. (2008). Reformasi Pentadbiran Awam di Malaysia pada Masa Kepemimpinan Tun Mahathir. Jurnal Demokrasi, 8(1).