IMPACT OF ONLINE LEARNING BASED ON CREATIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT IN DESIGN AND INVENTION SUBJECT

Authors

  • Sitti Junaida Ambo
  • Tan Choon Keong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/ijelp.v4i.3429

Keywords:

brainstorming, online, innovation subject, understanding, creativity

Abstract

This research aimed to study students’ understanding and creative thinking in  Innovation Subject through online learning. This quasi-experimental quantitative  study focused on students’ understanding and creative thinking of the subject  through online learning brainstorming technique. Samples of 36 students from  School Y participated in the treatment (online learning) and every student sat for  the pre-test and post-test to measure their understanding and creativity of the  subject. Results from paired t-test have shown that the pre-test and post-test for  aspects of student achievement in the subject of design is t = 13.858 and the  level of significance is p = 0.001 and student creativity in the Invention Subject  is t = 16.739 and a significant level is p = 0.001. This significance level was  lower than 0.05 (P <0.05). Results showed that there are significant differences  between students’ achievement and creativity after applying the online learning  brainstorming technique. This showed that online learning has successfully  increased students understanding and creative thinking of the subject, aligned  with the government’s wish and education blueprint, which is to produce creative products. 

References

Abigail, M. (2016). Effect of Nominal Group Technique of Brainstorming on the Achievement of Secondary School Biology Students in Anambra State , Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 76–84.

Alshammari, M. (2015). Effective Brainstorming in Teaching Social Studies for Elementary School. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(2), 60–65. Bhagwatwar, A., Massey, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2013). Creative virtual environments: Effect of supraliminal priming on team brainstorming. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.152

Dharmawan, K., Ramona, Y., Rupiasih, N., & Nilakusmawati, D. P. E. (2015). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Google Docs Sebagai Media Pembinaan Karya Ilmiah Remaja. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, October, 45–48. http://erepo.unud.ac.id/2231/1/cba5cfbb1d7ec2f5a19fb00fb7c542b2.pdf

Emami, C., Najafipour, M., & Dehghan, S. (2013). The effect of the using the brainstorming method on the academic achievement of students in grade five in Tehran elementary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.045

Faste, H., Rachmel, N., Essary, R., & Sheehan, E. (2013). Brainstorm, Chainstorm, Cheatstorm, Tweetstorm. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’13, 1343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466177

Hafiza Abas, & Halimah Badioze Zaman. (2010). Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan Penceritaan Digital dan Teknologi Realiti Tambahan (Augmented Reality) untuk Membantu Pelajar Pemulihan Membaca Bahasa Melayu. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT, 2010 161, 2001, 161–170.

Hashim, Y. (2015). Penggunaan e-Pembelajaran dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang berkesan Profesor Dr Yusup Hshim Asia e University Kuala Lumpur. October 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282642078_Penggunaan_e

Pembelajaran_dalam_pengajaran_dan_pembelajaran_yang_berkesan_Profesor_Dr_Yusu p_Hshim_Asia_e_University_Kuala_Lumpur

Eliason & Lynn, N. (2014). A Comparison of online and face to face collaboration on the performance of middle school math students standardized assessment. ERIC, ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, University of West Florida.

Michinov, N. (2012). Is electronic brainstorming or brainwriting the best way to improve creative performance in groups? An overlooked comparison of two idea-generation techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(SUPPL. 1), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x

Michinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Le Hénaff, B. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037

Muhamad Abdillah Royo & Haleefa Mahmood. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Kelemahan Yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Cemerlang Dalam Mata Pelajaran Reka Cipta. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 145–174.

Osborn, Alex (1953). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons

Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., Arditti, L. E., & Korde, R. M. (2013). Understanding the Group Size Effect in Electronic Brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44(3), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413479674

Qiu, M. (2010). A Mixed Methods Study of Class Size and Group Configuration in Online Graduate Course Discussions. In ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. http://search.proquest.com/docview/870955166?accountid=11262 LA - English

Rainal, H. W., Ruzaika, O. B., Jaffri, H., & Muhammad Firdaus, R. (2016). Sumbang Saran Berkategori Sebagai Pendekatan Dalam Pembangunan Kemahiran Pemikiran Kreatif Pelajar Reka Bentuk Tekstil Di Universiti Teknologi Mara Malaysia. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(4), 1–11.

Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., Cramond, B. (2010) Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as Predictors of Personal and Public Achievement: A Fifty Year Follow-Up. Creativity Research Journal, 22 (4). DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2010.523393.

Sophonhiranrak, S., Suwannatthachote, P., & Ngudgratoke, S. (2015). Factors Affecting Creative Problem Solving in the Blended Learning Environment: A Review of the Literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1982), 2130–2136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.012

Wang, H., & Fussell, S. R. (2010). Conversational Similarity in Online Multicultural Multiparty Brainstorming. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718980

Wood, D., & Bilsborow, C. (2011). “I Am Not a Person with a Creative Mind”: Facilitating Creativity in the Undergraduate Curriculum through a Design-Based Research Approach. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 12(1), 111–125. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1020667&lang =nl&site=ehost-live

Young, J., & Cho, C. M. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014- 9265-0

Downloads

Published

2021-10-12

How to Cite

Sitti Junaida Ambo, & Tan Choon Keong. (2021). IMPACT OF ONLINE LEARNING BASED ON CREATIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT IN DESIGN AND INVENTION SUBJECT. International Journal on E-Learning Practices (IJELP), 4, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.51200/ijelp.v4i.3429
Total Views: 159 | Total Downloads: 165