FACTORS INFLUENCING STUDENT ADOPTION OF DIGITAL STORYTELLING IN A LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: EVIDENCE FROM UMS ITEL USING UTAUT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/ijelp.v9i1.7468Keywords:
E-learning, digital storytelling, student perceptions, UTAUT, structural equation modelingAbstract
Digital Storytelling (DST) is one of the innovative pedagogical approaches that enhances student engagement in the learning process. However, its adoption within the Malaysian university e-learning environment remains underexplored. This study investigates undergraduate students’ perceptions of DST adoption within Universiti Malaysia Sabah's learning management system called iTEL. This study uses the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as the guiding framework. Throughout this study, a structured survey instrument was developed to examine the influence of Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), and Facilitating Conditions (FC) on students’ Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt DST. Data collection was conducted among undergraduate students in the information technology field to explore their perceptions of DST and its adoption in iTEL. The findings revealed that PE significantly influences students’ BI to adopt DST in iTEL. This implies that the usefulness of DST strongly determines students’ intention to use it. In contrast, EE, SI, and FC do not significantly affect students’ BI in adopting DST. These results imply that students’ willingness to adopt DST is primarily driven by their perception of its performance benefits rather than by ease of use, encouragement by peers or lecturers, or institutional and technical support. This study contributes to the understanding of DST adoption within the Malaysian university e-learning environment.
References
Abbad, M. M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e-learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7205-7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
Aditya, B. R., Ferdiana, R., & Kusumawardani, S. S. (2021). Categories for barriers to digital transformation in higher education: an analysis based on literature. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(12), 658-664. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.12.1578
Alblooshi, S., & Abdul Hamid, N. A. B. (2021). The role of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in e-learning adoption in higher education institutions in the UAE. IBIMA Business Review, 2021, 730690. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.730690
Alenezi, A. (2018). Barriers to participation in learning management systems in Saudi Arabian universities. Education Research International, 2018(1), 9085914. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9085914
Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1339
Almusharraf, A. I. (2024). An investigation of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems: insights for enhancing usability and engagement. Sustainability, 16(22), 10037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210037
Azmi Murad, M. A., Shah Jahan, A. F., Mohd Sharef, N., Ab Jalil, H., Ismail, I. A., & Mohd Noor, M. Z. (2022). An analytics dashboard for personalised e-learning: a preliminary study. In M. H. Habaebi, J. Sulaiman, & R. Mahmud (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Science and Technology (pp. 855-866). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7983-4_77
Bankovska, M., Rasheva-Yordanova, K., Borissova, D., & Stoev, S. (2023). Analysis and classification of methods and tools applicable to e-learning. In M. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning (pp. 232-242). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28222-5_23
Beck, M. S., & Neil, J. A. (2021). Digital storytelling: A qualitative study exploring the benefits, challenges, and solutions. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 39(3), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000710
Chasokela, D., Shava, G. N., & Mpofu, S. (2024). Challenges and opportunities of learning management system integration from a Zimbabwean university perspective. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Building Resiliency in Higher Education: Globalization, Digital Skills, and Student Wellness (pp. 73-98). Springer.
Clarke, R., & Adam, A. (2012). Digital storytelling in Australia: academic perspectives and reflections. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(1-2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210374223
Dalim, S. F., Azliza, N. Z. M., Ibrahim, N., Zulkipli, Z. A., & Yusof, M. M. M. (2019). Digital storytelling for 21st century learning: a study on pre-service teachers’ perception. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7560
de Freitas, C. (2025). Scaffolding storytelling in project-based learning using learning management systems: a case study. In 2025 IEEE Engineering Education World Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE58625.2025.1234567
Ferreira, R., Cardoso, E., & Oliveira, J. (2023). How can LMS affect student’s motivation and engagement? In L. Rocha, M. Serrano, & A. Reis (Eds.), Digital Technologies and Transformation in Business, Industry and Organizations: Volume 2 (pp. 183-195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32482-6_14
Hasan, A., Raghuwanshi, S., Harsora, H., Kumar, P., Gupta, V., & Singh, A. S. (2025). Elearning adoption among millennials: behavioural intentions and the extended UTAUT model. Discover Education, 4(1), 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00813-y
Jain, S., Prabha, C., Nandan, D., & Bhosale, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of frequently used e-learning platforms. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1431531. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1431531
Kader, M. (2023). Digital storytelling in postgraduate strategic management courses. In A. Borthwick & P. Shallcross (Eds.), Integrating Digital Literacy in the Disciplines (pp. 131-142). Routledge.
Malisius, E. (2018). Academic rigour and video technology: A case study on digital storytelling in graduate-level assignments. In A. Jemni, K. Kinshuk, & M. Khribi (Eds.), The Disruptive Power of Online Education: Challenges, Opportunities, Responses (pp. 167-184). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-325-620181010
Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T., Nguyen, P., & Huynh, V. D. B. (2019). Roles of e-learning in higher education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6(4), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.22159/jcr.06.04.02
Nunvarova, J., Poulova, P., Prazak, P., & Klimova, B. (2023). Effectiveness of digital storytelling in teaching economics. Education Sciences, 13(5), 504. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050504
Sakthivel, S., Aruldoss, L., Vinoth, M., & Bharathi, M. M. (2025). The impact of digital storytelling on motivation, engagement, and proficiency in English as a second language (ESL) learners at higher education institutions. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3270, No. 1, p. 020232). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.020232
Schukin, A., Scerbakov, N., & Rezedinova, E. (2024). Microservice architecture of modern eLearning application. In 2024 5th International Conference on Communications, Information, Electronic and Energy Systems (CIEES) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEES56767.2024.1234567
Tian, Y., & Suki, N. M. (2023). Evaluating future trends of digital storytelling in higher education: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(17), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i17.12345
Ugap, C., Yahaya, W. A. W., Balakrishnan, B., Hashim, M. E. A. H., Tochinai, F., & Nasir, S. M. (2025). Tech-infused narrative: a systematic review of digital storytelling in education. Journal of Advanced Research Design, 131(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jard.2025.01.001
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540