Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Psychometric Analysis among Malaysian University Student during COVID-19 Pandemic
Skala Kemurungan Kebimbangan Tekanan (DASS-21): Analisis Psikometrik dalam Kalangan Pelajar Universiti Malaysia semasa Pandemik COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jpks.v6i1.5716Keywords:
DASS-21, reliability, validity, psychometric properties, reliabiliti, validiti, ciri psikometrikAbstract
The aim of this study is to test the psychometric properties of the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). The DASS-21 is a set of three self-report scales consisting of 21 items to measure the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. A sample of 380 (256 female, 124 male) university students in Malaysia were randomly selected to participate in this study. The reliability of the DASS-21 was evaluated by measuring the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) reliability. The convergent, concurrent, and discriminant properties were examined to evaluate the validity of the scale. Item analysis was also performed through the item-total correlation approach. The reliability of the DASS-21 showed excellent Cronbach’s alpha values of .916 and .891 for the subscales of depression and anxiety respectively, while the stress subscale showed low reliability with Cronbach’s alpha value of .472. The convergent validity of the DASS-21 was tested by examining the relationship between the dimensions of the scale which have moderate to strong and positive correlations ranging from r = .561 to .777. The concurrent validity was assessed by examining the relationship between the three subscales of DASS-21 and the score of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) which showed negative and significant correlations ranging from r = -.377 to -.615. The discriminant validity was evaluated by factor analyzing items of DASS-21 and items of World Health Organization Quality of Life, WHOQOL-Bref (Field Trial Version). All items of DASS-21 were loaded in one component while the items of WHOQOL-Bref (Field Trial Version) were loaded in another component, except for 3 items. The item analysis showed that the item-total correlation coefficient for three subscales of DASS-21 exceeded the recommended value of .30, except for item 14. From this study, the DASS-21 showed a high reliability and validity score and can be used to assess and measure mental health states among university students in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, further studies are required to enhance the evidence of reliability and validity for the DASS-21 instrument.
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menguji ciri psikometrik Skala Tekanan Kebimbangan Kemurungan 21 item (DASS-21). DASS-21 adalah satu set laporan kendiri tiga skala yang mengandungi 21 item untuk mengukur kemurungan, kebimbangan dan tekanan. Seramai 380 (256 perempuan, 124 lelaki) pelajar universiti di Malaysia yang dipilih secara rawak terlibat dalam kajian ini. Kebolehpercayaan DASS-21 dinilai dengan metod ketekalan dalaman (Cronbach’s Alpha). Validiti konvergen, serentak dan diskriminasi bagi skala ini turut dikaji. Analisis item juga dijalankan melalui kaedah korelasi item keseluruhan. Kebolehpercayaan DASS-21 menunjukkan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha yang sangat tinggi iaitu .916 dan .891 untuk skala kemurungan dan kebimbangan, manakala skala tekanan menunjukkan kebolehpercayaan yang rendah dengan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha = .472. Kesahan konvergen DASS-21 telah diuji dengan mengkaji hubungan antara tiga skala DASS-21. Hasil menunjukan korelasi positif yang sederhana tinggi iaitu, antara r = .561 hingga .777. Kesahan serentak dinilai dengan mengkaji hubungan antara tiga skala DASS-21 dengan skor Skala Kesejahteraan Mental Warwick-Edinburgh (WEMWBS). Hasil menunjukkan korelasi negatif dan signifikan antara r = -.377 hingga -.615. Kesahan diskriminasi dinilai dengan menganalisis faktor semua item DASS-21 dan semua item instrument Kualiti Hidup Pertubuhan Kesihatan Sedunia, WHOQOL-Bref (Versi Percubaan Lapangan). Hasil menunjukkan semua item DASS-21 dimuatkan dalam satu komponen manakala item WHOQOL-Bref (Versi Percubaan Lapangan) dimuatkan dalam komponen lain, kecuali untuk 3 item. Analisis item menunjukkan bahawa pekali korelasi jumlah item untuk tiga skala DASS-21 adalah melebih kriteria yang dicadangkan iaitu .30, kecuali untuk item 14. Hasil kajian ini menujukkan secara keseluruhan DASS-21 mempunyai kebolehpercayaan dan kesahan yang baik serta boleh digunakan untuk mengukur keadaan kesihatan mental dalam kalangan pelajar universiti di Malaysia. Walau bagaimanapun, kajian lanjut masih diperlukan untuk meningkatkan bukti kebolehpercayaan dan kesahan DASS-21.
References
Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2010). Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110392383
Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-194399104
Clark, L. A., Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. 37 Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Coker, A. O., Coker, O. O., & Sanni, D. (2018). Psychometric properties of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scale (DASS-21). African Research Review, 12(2), 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v12i2.13
Connelly, L. M. (2020). Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Medical Surgical Nursing, 29(2), 125. https://www.proquest.com/openview/46ad1457b17d5d5995f448f9133109fa/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=30764
Department of Health. (2016). The relationship between wellbeing and health. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl
oads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/295474/
Jani, R., Alias, A. A., Awang, H., & Arunasalam, R. S. (2020). Psychometric properties of the WHO quality of life disability (WHOQOL-DIS) among persons with disabilities in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(3), 2113–2127. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/resources/files/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2028%20(3)%20Sep.%202020/29%20JSSH-4753-2019.pdf
Kayri, M. (2011). The effects of methods of imputation for missing values on the validity and reliability of scales. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 303–309. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289558005_The_Effects_of_Methods_of_Imputation_for_Missing_Values_on_the_Validity_and_Reliability_of_Scales
Le, M. T., Tran, T. D., Holton, S., Nguyen, H. T., Wolfe, R., & Fisher, J. (2017). Reliability, convergent validity and factor structure of the DASS-21 in a sample of Vietnamese adolescents. PLOS ONE, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180557
Li, X., Shek, D. T., & Shek, E. Y. (2021). Psychological morbidity among university students in Hong Kong (2014–2018): Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) and related correlates.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168305
Lovibond, P., & Lovibond, S. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
Oei, T. P., Sawang, S., Goh, Y. W., & Mukhtar, F. (2013). Using the depression anxiety stress scale 21 (DASS-21) across cultures. International journal of psychology: Journal international de Psychologie, 48(6), 1018–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.755535
Osman, Z. J., Mukhtar, F., Hashim, H. A., Abdul Latiff, L., Mohd Sidik, S., Awang, H., Ibrahim, N., Abdul Rahman, H., Ismail, S. I., Ibrahim, F., Tajik, E., & Othman, N. (2014). Testing comparison models of DASS-12 and its reliability among adolescents in Malaysia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(7), 1720–1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.011
Ramli, M., Salmiah, M. A., & Nurul Ain, M. (2009). Validation and psychometric properties of Bahasa Malaysia version of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales (DASS) among diabetic patients. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry E-journal, 18(2). http://mjpsychiatry.org/index.php/mjp/article/view/65/0
Skevington, S., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:qure.0000018486.91360.00
Stewart-Brown, S., & Janmohamed, K. (2008). Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) User Guide. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, June. http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/userguide.pdf
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Thomas, L. (2020, October 2). An introduction to simple random sampling. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/simple-random-sampling/.