KONSEP KEMUDAHSAMPAIAN DALAM PERKHIDMATAN PENGANGKUTAN AWAM: THE CONCEPT OF ACCESSIBILITY IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

SARAVANAN  SUNDARA SAKARAN; HARIFAH  MOHD NOOR

doi:10.51200/ejk.v26i.2495

Authors

SARAVANAN SUNDARA SAKARAN Program Geografi, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 88400 Universiti Malaysia Sabah
HARIFAH MOHD NOOR Program Geografi, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, 88400 Universiti Malaysia Sabah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v26i.2495

Keywords:

Accessibility, Kemudahsampaian, pengangkutan awam, aktiviti sosial, pergerakan, destinasi, ruang, analisis kandungan , public transportation, social activities, movement, content analysis , spatial

Abstract

Dalam dunia modenisasi dan globalisasi, kemudahsampaian memainkan peranan penting dalam aktiviti sosial harian. Pengangkutan awam turut memainkan peranan yang penting dalam pergerakan masyarakat dari satu destinasi ke satu destinasi yang lain. Namun, konsep kemudahsampaian mempunyai maksud yang pelbagai mengikut pernyataan-pernyataan yang diungkapkan oleh sarjana-sarjana lepas berdasarkan kedudukan geografi di sesuatu ruang. Oleh itu, objektif makalah ini adalah untuk melihat konsep kemudahsampaian secara umum yang melihat ke dalam perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam secara khusus. Kajian ini menggunakan sumber sekunder untuk menerangkan konsep kemudahsampaian secara umum yang khusus dalam perkhidmatan pengangkutan awam. Antara sumber sekunder digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah seperti artikel jurnal, buku, tesis, dan laporan. Maka, analisis kandungan diimplementasikan dalam kajian ini adalah untuk merungkaikan konsep kemudahsampaian pengangkutan awam secara mendalam. Hasil kajian ini mendapati konsep kemudahsampaian pengangkutan awam dipengaruhi oleh beberapa aspek-aspek seperti sosial, ekonomi dan politik. Implikasi kajian ini boleh dibahagikan kepada dua bahagian iaitu; implikasi kepada ilmu pengetahuan dan implikasi dari sudut praktikal untuk membantu perancang polisi dan pembuat keputusan memahami konsep kemudahsampaian pengangkutan awam dengan lebih mendalam supaya polisi pengangkutan awam dapat dirangka dengan mengambil kira indikator kemudahsampaian pada masa hadapan.

In the world of modernization and globalization, accessibility plays an important role in daily social activities. Public transportation also plays an important role in the movement of people from one place to another. However, the concept of accessibility has different meanings based on statements made by previous scholars based on the geographical position of a particular space. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to look at the concept of accessibility in general and the mode of public transportation services is to be looked into in particular. This study uses secondary sources to explain the concept of accessibility in general and the mode of public transportation services specifically. Among the secondary sources used in this study are journal articles, books, theses, and reports. Therefore, content analysis was implemented in this study to unravel the concept of public transportation accessibility in depth. The results of this study found that the concept of public transportation accessibility is influenced by several aspects such as social, economy and politic. The implications of this study can be divided into two parts namely; the implications of body of knowledge and the implication on the view of practical points in order to contribute help to policy planners and decision makers to better understand the concept of public transportation accessibility so that the future formulation of policies could be enacted with taking the indicator of public transportation accessibility into account.

References

Aarhaug, J., & Elvebakk, B. (2015). The impact of universally accessible public transport-a before and after study. Transport Policy, 44, 143–150.

Adhvaryu, B., Chopde, A., & Dashora, L. (2019). Mapping public transport accessibility levels (PTAL) in India and its applications: A case study of Surat. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7, 293-300.

Andreasen, M. H., & Moller-Jensen, L. (2017). Access to the city: Mobility patterns, transport and accessibility in peripheral settlements of Dar es Salaam. Journal of Transport Geography, 62, 20–29.

Abreha, D. A. (2007). Analyzing public transport performance using efficiency measures and spatial analysis: The case of Addis Ababa. Tesis Sarjana (Tidak diterbitkan). Netherlands: International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede.

Armstrong, A. & Thiriez, S. (1987). Bus services: Reducing cost, raising standards, Urban transport series. The World Bank.

Birkenmeyer M, B. Ruger B., Simic G, B. D. (2012). Public transportation for all. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 341–349.

Bhattacharya T, Brown J, Jarozynski M, & Batuhan T. (2014). The effects of perception vs “reality” on travel behavior after major transit service change: The case of Tallahassee, Florida. Journal of Public Transportation. 17 (2). 1-26.

Bocarejo J. P. (2012). Transport accessibility and social inequities: A tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 142–154.

Carruthers, R., Dick, M., & Saurkar, A. (2005). Affordability of public transport in developing countries. Transport Paper 3, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Couclelis H. (2000). From sustainable transportation to sustainable accessibility: Can we avoid a new tragedy of the commons? Social Change and Sustainable Transport (SCAST)., 341-356.

Chen, J., Ni, J., Xi, C., Li, S., & Wang, J. (2017). Determining intra-urban spatial accessibility disparities in multimodal public transport networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 123–133.

Cordera, R., Coppola, P., Dell’Olio, L., & Ibeas, A. (2019). The impact of accessibility by public transport on real estate values: A comparison between the cities of Rome and Santander. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 308-319

Cui, B., Boisjoly, G., El-Geneidy, A., & Levinson, D. (2019). Accessibility and the journey to work through the lens of equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 269–277.

Curtis, C., Ellder, E., & Scheurer, J. (2019). Case studies on transport policy public transport accessibility tools matter: A case study of Gothenburg, Sweden. Case Studies on Transport Studies, 7, 96–107.

Deboosere, R., & El-Geneidy, A. (2018). Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 73, 54–63.

Eco Health Alliance. (2017). Two days hands on GIS training for the development health research unit training. Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University Malaysia Sabah.

Farrington J. H. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport Geography 15, 319–330.

Gil Sola, A., Vilhelmson, B., & Larsson, A. (2018). Understanding sustainable accessibility in urban planning: Themes of consensus, themes of tension. Journal of Transport Geography, 70, 1–10.

Grise, E., Boisjoly, G., Maguire, M., & El-Geneidy, A. (2019). Elevating access: Comparing accessibility to jobs by public transport for individuals with and without a physical disability. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 280-293.

Gulyas, A., & Kovacs, A. (2016). Assessment of transport connections based on accessibility. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1723–1732.

Geurs K. T & Vann Wee B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 127–140.

Heinrichs, D., & Bernet, J. S. (2014). Public transport and accessibility in informal settlements: Aerial cable cars in Medellin, Colombia. Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 55–67.

Hernandez, D. (2018). Uneven mobilities, uneven opportunities: Social distribution of public transport accessibility to jobs and education in Montevideo. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 119–125.

Handy S. (1994). Highway blues: nothing a little accessibility can’t cure. Berkeley: University of California Transportation Centre.

Harifah M. N, Aliakbar G. & Jabil M. (2017). Sistem dan isu pengangkutan awam Kota Kinabalu Sabah. Dalam Mohammad Tahir Mapa, Ubong Imang dan Mustapa Abd Talip. (eds). Isu-isu alam sekitar dan manusia di Sabah kajian dari sudut pandang geografi. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Harifah, M. N, Mazdi M, Jabil M, & Oliver V. E. (2016). Keberkesanan perkhidmatan bas mini di Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space. 12(12), 50-62.

Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M., Le Pira, M., Capri, S., & Giuffrida, N. (2017). Influence of accessibility, land use and transport policies on the transport energy dependence of a city. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3273–3285.

Johnson, D., Ercolani, M., & Mackie, P. (2017). Econometric analysis of the link between public transport accessibility and employment. Transport Policy, 60, 1–9.

Karekla, X., Fujiyama, T., & Tyler, N. (2011). Evaluating accessibility enhancements to public transport including indirect as well as direct benefits. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 2, 92–100.

Karner, A. (2018). Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 24–32.

Karou, S., & Hull, A. (2014). Accessibility modelling: Predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 1–11.

Kujala, R., Weckstrom, C., Mladenovic, M. N., & Saramaki, J. (2018). Travel times and transfers in public transport: Comprehensive accessibility analysis based on Pareto-optimal journeys. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 67, 41–54.

Lantseva, A. A., & Ivanov, S. V. (2016). Modeling transport accessibility with open data: Case study of St. Petersburg. Procedia Computer Science, 101, 197–206.

Lattman, K., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2016). Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 257–263.

Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2019). Analyzing collective accessibility using average space-time prisms. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 69, 250–264.

Lionjanga, N., & Venter, C. (2018). Does public transport accessibility enhance subjective well-being? A study of the City of Johannesburg. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 523–535.

Litman, T. 2013. The new transportation planning paradigm. ITE Journal. 83(6): 20-28.

Liu, R., Chen, Y., Wu, J., Xu, T., Gao, L., & Zhao, X. (2018). Mapping spatial accessibility of public transportation network in an urban area – A case study of Shanghai Hongqiao Transportation Hub. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 478–495.

Medda, F. (2012). Land value capture finance for transport accessibility: A review. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 154–161.

Moyano, A., Moya-Gomez, B., & Gutierrez, J. (2018). Access and egress times to high-speed rail stations: A spatiotemporal accessibility analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 73, 84–93.

Murray A. T, Davis R, Stimson R. J & Ferreira L. (1998). Public transportation access. Journal of Transport and Environment. 3(5): 319-328.

Mazdi, M., Jabil, M., dan Rosmiza, M. Z. (2014). Mengupas keciciran pelajar Orang Asli Malaysia: Suatu tinjauan ke dalam isu aksesibiliti sekolah. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 10(2), 189–198.

Mohd Luqman H. R. (2015). Kebolehcapaian perkhidmatan awam kepada Orang Kelainan Upaya (OKU) kes KTM. Research Gate. Diakses melalui

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282074089 pada 7 April 2016.

Nazari Adli, S., Chowdhury, S., & Shiftan, Y. (2019). Justice in public transport systems: A comparative study of Auckland, Brisbane, Perth and Vancouver. Cities, 90, 88–99.

Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Currie, G., De Gruyter, C., & Young, W. (2018). How do public transport users adjust their travel behaviour if public transport ceases? A qualitative study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 54, 1–14.

Niehaus, M., Galilea, P., & Hurtubia, R. (2016). Accessibility and equity: An approach for wider transport project assessment in Chile. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 412–422.

Nurlaela, S., & Curtis, C. (2012). Modeling household residential location choice and travel behavior and its relationship with public transport accessibility. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 56–64.

Pyrialakou, V. D., Gkritza, K., & Fricker, J. D. (2016). Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 252–269.