Hubungan persekitaran pembelajaran dan pencapaian akademik pelajar Tingkatan Enam
The relationship between the learning environment and the academic achievement of Form Six students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v11i1.4278Keywords:
persekitaran pembelajaran, pencapaian akademik, pelajar, learning environment, academic achievement, studentAbstract
Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti persekitaran pembelajaran pelajar berdasarkan faktor demografi (jantina, umur, kaum dan aliran) dan pencapaian akademik pelajar Tingkatan Enam. Kajian ini turut mengkaji tahap persekitaran pembelajaran dari segi kemudahan fasiliti, persekitaran bilik darjah dan pengajaran guru dan hubungan antara persekitaran pembelajaran dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar Tingkatan Enam SMK Labuan, Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan, Malaysia. Dalam kajian ini, seramai 110 orang pelajar telah dipilih melalui persampelan rawak berstrata (stratified random sampling) bagi mewakili populasi iaitu 153 orang pelajar sebagai responden kajian. Sekolah yang dikaji adalah di SMK Labuan di Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan. Data yang diperolehi adalah menggunakan perisian Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) versi 26.0. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif (min, kekerapan dan peratus) dan statistik inferensi (Ujian-t, Ujian ANOVA dan Korelasi). Darjah kebolehpercayaan (Cronbach Alpha) bagi keseluruhan persekitaran pembelajaran adalah .929 manakala pencapaian akademik adalah .880. Hasil dapatan kajian menunjukkan secara keseluruhannya tahap persekitaran pembelajaran dan tahap pencapaian akademik adalah tinggi. Analisis korelasi Pearson pula mendapati bahawa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara persekitaran pembelajaran dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar Tingkatan Enam di SMK Labuan, Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan. Kajian ini memberi impak kepada sekolah dalam mengadakan program kecemerlangan akademik berkaitan pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan pelajar Tingkatan Enam.
This study aims to identify the learning environment of students based on demographic factors (gender, age, ethnicity, and stream) and the academic achievement of Form Six students. It also examines the level of the learning environment in terms of facility availability, classroom environment, teacher instruction, and the relationship between the learning environment and the academic performance of Form Six students at SMK Labuan, Federal Territory of Labuan, Malaysia. In this study, a total of 110 students were selected through stratified random sampling to represent the population of 153 students as study respondents. The school studied is SMK Labuan in the Federal Territory of Labuan. The data collected was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 26.0 software. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, and percentage) and inferential statistics (t-test, ANOVA, and Correlation). The reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) for the overall learning environment is .929, while for academic achievement it is .880. The study's findings show that, overall, the level of the learning environment and academic achievement are high. Pearson correlation analysis also found that there is a significant relationship between the learning environment and the academic achievement of Form Six students at SMK Labuan, Federal Territory of Labuan. This study has an impact on the school in organizing academic excellence programs related to academic achievement among Form Six students.
References
Arham Abdullah, et al (2006). Faktor-faktor Yang Menyumbang kepada Kecemerlangan Akademik Pelajar di Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.Diperolehi pada Julai 25, 2007 Daripada:http://eprints.utm.my/458/1/ArhamAbdullah2006_Faktorfaktoryang menyumbangkepada.pdf
Arzi, H. (2003). Enhancing science education laboratory environment: More than wall, benches and widgets. Dlm. Fraser, B.J., & Tobin, K.G. (Eds). International Handbook of Science Education, Vol. (1), Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bartlett, B.A. (2003). Blogging to Learn. Knowledge Tree E-Journal. Retrieved from: http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edtion04/pdf/Blogging_olearn.pdf.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan DasarPendidikan. (2006). Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010.Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Bucholz, J. L., & Sheffler, J. L. (2009). Creating a Warm and Inclusive Classroom Environment: Planning for All Children to Feel Welcome,ElectronicJournalforInclusiveEducation,2(4).
Cavanagh, R (2012). Associations between the Classroom Learning Environment and Student Engagement in Learning 1: A Rasch Model Approach, in Knight, J. (ed),The Joint Australian Association for Research in Education and Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference (AARE-APERA), Dec 2-6 2012. Sydney, Australia: Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE).
Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Kamisah Osman & Lilia Halim. (2010). Physical and psychosocial aspect of science laboratory learning environment. Procedia Socialand Behavioral Sciences Journal, 9,87-91.
Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Kamisah Osman & Lilia Halim. (2010). Hubungan ramalan persekitaran pembelajaran makmal Sains dengan tahap kepuasan pelajar.Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 19-30.
Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Lilia Halim, Tamby Subahan Mohd Meerah, Kamisah Osman, & Arbaat Hassan. (2009). Malaysian science laboratory: Issues and constrains.Paper presented at the ESERA conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 28th August-4thSeptember.
Chism, N.V.N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces.Dlm. Oblinger, D.G. (Ed.). Learning Spaces,2.0-2.12. Educause. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/learningspaces [15 September 2007].
Den Brok, P., Fisher, D. & Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behavior for student attitudes in Brunei primary science classes. International Journal of Science Education.
Ee, Ah Meng (2003). Ilmu pendidikan: Pengetahuan dan Ketrampilan Ikhtisas (Semester 1).Selangor Darul Ehsan: Penerbit Fajar Bakti.
Fraser, B.J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 7-33.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L.(2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.).New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Edisi ke-7. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hill, M. C., & Epps, K. K. (2010). The impact of physical classroom environment on student satisfaction and student evaluation of teaching in the university environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 65-79.
Jan Bennett. (2001). The relationship between classroom climate and student achievement.DissertationEdD: University of North Texas. Unpublished.
Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin. (2007). Kemahiran interpersonal guru sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pedagogi,1(2), 47-62.
Kennedy, M. (2012). Learning in comfort ergonomic consideration are an important factor in classroom furniture.American School & University. ASUMAG.COM.
Khadijah Kamaruzzaman & Azimin Samsul Mohd Tazilan. (2013). Thermal comfort assessment of a classroom in tropical climate conditions. Recent Advances in Energy, Environment & Development, 30(1), 87-91.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.Educational and psychological measurement,30(3), 607-610.
Mohd Hairy Ibrahim, Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad & Noraini Mohamed Noh. (2012). Kesan perubahan iklim terhadap keselesaan terma: Cabaran di sekolah.Prosiding. 1st International conference on innovation and technology for sustainable built environment (ICITSBE), Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perak.
Mok, S. S. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan untuk Pengajaran & Pembelajaran. Ipoh, Malaysia: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn.
Moos, R.H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures,finding and policy implication. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Osman, K, Che Nidzam Che Ahmad & Lilia Halim. (2011). Students’ perception of the physical and psychosocial science laboratory in Malaysia: Comparison across subject and school location.Procedia social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 15, 1650-1655.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (3rd ed.).Allen & Unwin.
Ramsden, P. (1991). A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16,129–149.
Rohana, K., Nor Rashidah, Z. & Zaidi, M.A. (2009). The quality of learning environment and academic performance from a student's perceptions. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 171-175.
Shaari, A. S., Mohd Yusoff, N., Ghazali, M. I., Osman, R. (2012). Hubungan antara gaya pengajaran pensyarah dengan penglibatan akademik pelajar universiti.Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2012.
Sahin, I.T., Tantekin-Erden, F.& Akar,H. (2011). The influence of the physical environment on early childhood education classroom management.Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 44,185-202.
Siti Mistima Maat & Effandi Zakaria(2010). The Learning Environment, Teacher’s Factor and Students Attitude Towards Mathematics Amongst Engineering Technology Students.International Journal Of Academic Research 2(2),16–20.
Strange, C.C., & Banning, J.H. (2001). Educating by design: Creating campus learning environments that work.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Vale ́ria Azzi Collet da Grac, Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski & Joao Roberto Diego Petreche. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of The State Sao Paulo in Brazil.Building and Environment, 42(2007), 984–999.
Weilin, C., Guoguang, C., Jung, H.P., Qin, O., Yingxin, Z., (2013). Influence of indoor air temperature on human thermal comfort, motivation and performance.Building and Environment, 68(2013), 114-122.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. (10th ed.).Allyn and Bacon.
Zalika Adam, Faridah Kassim & Mohamad Johari Salleh. (2009). Memperkasakan pendidikan luar bandar, 3–5. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Luar Bandar 2009, 3 –5 Februari 2009, Hotel Baverly, Kota Kinabalu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



