Model inkuiri 5E dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu: The 5E inquiry model in the teaching of the Malay language

Musirin Mosin; Connie C. Ah Gang @ Christine

doi:10.51200/jpp.v12i1.5010

Authors

Musirin Mosin Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Connie C. Ah Gang @ Christine Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v12i1.5010

Keywords:

model inkuiri 5e, pengajaran, bahasa melayu, 5e inquiry model , teaching, malay language

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pelaksanaan dan kesan Model Inkuiri 5E dalam dalam pengajaran Bahasa Melayu. Kajian melibatkan enam informan di Penampang. Metodologi kajian adalah kualitatif dengan memungut data secara temu bual dan analisis secara deskriptif ke atas enam orang informan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru adalah menjurus kepada perbincangan, sumbang saran, pengumpulan bahan hand on, pemberian tajuk awal, aktiviti berpusatkan pelajar, penggunaan tablet, teknik IMBaKup dan pembinaan soalan pemahaman, telah meninggalkan kesan positif kepada pelajar di mana mereka berasa seronok, tidak bosan, mudah faham, dan senang mengingat fakta yang dipelajari. Rumusnya, secara keseluruhan kajian ini dapat memperbaiki amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru, di mana kepenggunaan Model Inkuiri 5E menjadikan pengajaran guru lebih kreatif.

This study aims to examine the implementation and effects of the 5E Inquiry Model" in the teaching of the MalayLanguage. The study conducted in Penampang involved sixinformants. The qualitative research methodology iscollecting data through interviews and descriptive analysis ofsixinformants. The results of the study show that the implementation of teaching and learning by teachers is aimed at discussion, brainstorming, collection of hands-onmaterials, giving initial titles, student-centered activities, use of tablets, IMBaKup techniques,and the construction of comprehension questions, has left a positive impact on students where they feel fun, not boring, easy to understand, and easy to remember learned facts. Overall, this study can improve teachers' teaching and learning practices. The 5E Inquiry Model makes teachers' teaching more creative.

References

Alizah Lamri & Zamri Mahamod (2015). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu berpusatkan pelajar di institusi pengajian tinggi: Pelaksanaan dan Penerimaan Pelajar. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar,18(1).

Bulbul, Y.(2010).Effects of 7E learning cycle model accompanied with computer animations on understanding of diffusion and osmosis concepts. Middle East TechnicalUniversity

Creswell, J.W. (2008). Education research: planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.3rdEdition, Perason/ Merril Prentice Hall.

Colburn, A.(2000). Defines inquiry and inquiry-based instruction.Sciene Scope, 23(6),44

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus Merrill Greenwood.

Haris Fazilah KassiM(2002). Masalah menulis karangan di kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat: Satu Kajian Kes. Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

Mohd Paris Salleh. (2016).Model pengajaran M-Pembelajaran berasaskan kaedah inkuiri mata Sejarah peringkat menengah. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaya.

Masha Smallhon, Jeanne Young, Narelle Hunter & Karen Burke Da Silva(2015). Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagementin large first year topic. Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia,6 (2),65-71.

MarohainiBinti Yusof (2004). Menjalani penyelidikan kualitatif: Isu-isu perkaedahan,Universiti MalayaRepository.

Masyuniza Yunos (2015). Hubungan sikap dan persepsi murid terhadap pembelajaranBahasaMelayu dengan kemahiran abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 22-30.

Othman Mohamed (2001). Penulisan tesis dalam bidang sains sosial terapan. Universiti Putra Malaysia

Oxford Advance Learner’Dictionary(1995). Oxford University Press.

Opara, Jacinta Agbarachi dan Nkasiobi Silas Oguzor. (2011). Inquiry instructional method and the school Science curriculum. Journal of Social Science,3(3),188-189.

Pranee Liamputtong (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan kualitatif, Edisi Ketiga. Terjemahan Haliza Mohd Riji dan Shamsudin Ahmad, Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.

Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia(PPPM): 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Peter, O. I., Abiodun, A. P. & Jonathan, O. O. (2010). Effect of constructivism instructionalapproach on teaching practical skills to mechanical-related trade students inWestern Nigeriatechnical colleges.International NGO Journals, 5(3),59-64.

Rodger W. B.(2009). The BSCS 5E Instructionalmodel and 21stcentury skills. National Academic Board on Science Education.

Roselan Baki (2003). Kaedah pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu.Karisma Publications.

Siti Zabidah(2006).Kesan pendekatan penyebatian kemahiran berfikir kreatif dalam pengajaran karangan deskriptif dan karangan imiginatif dalam kalangan pelajar Tingkatan IV, LB1591.5.M2 S623 2006 f rb. Publisher 8 August 2006.

Sund & Trowbridge (1973). Teaching Science by inquiry in the secondary school. Columbus: Charles E. Merill Publishing Company. Suparno, P. 1997.

Vera Septi Andrini (2016). The effectiveness of inquiry learning method to enhance students’ learning outcomes: Atheoreticaland empirical review.Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3).

Winnie Sim Siew Li & Mohamad Yusof Arshad (2015). Inquiry practices in malaysiansecondary classroom and model of inquiry teachingbased on verbal interaction. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12,151-175.

Yahya Othman, Dk. Suzanawaty Pg. Osman(2014).Keupayaan menguasai kemahiran menulis melalui pembelajaran berasaskan projek nilam dalam penulisan berbentuk risalah di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 4, Mei 2014.

Zamri Mahamod (2014). Inovasi P&Pdalam Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak.