Teaching STEM with meaning: Digital pedagogical practices in Malaysian TVET

Fariedah Lal Chan; Fitri Suraya Mohamad Hapni Joblie

doi:10.51200/jpp.v13i1.7098

Authors

Fariedah Lal Chan Faculty of Education and Sports Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
Fitri Suraya Mohamad Hapni Joblie Faculty of Cognitive Science and Human Development, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v13i1.7098

Keywords:

STEM pedagogy, TVET, digital technologies, TPACK

Abstract

STEM education is widely acknowledged as a key driver in developing a skilled and adaptable workforce, particularly within Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). In Malaysia, policy initiatives have increasingly emphasised the integration of digital technologies into STEM teaching. Nevertheless, how such integration is practised pedagogically by TVET educators remains underexplored, especially at the level of everyday classroom practice. This study seeks to examine how STEM pedagogy is understood and implemented through digital technologies by Malaysian TVETMARA educators. Guided by the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, the study adopted a qualitative case study approach. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and lesson plan analyses involving ten educators from diverse engineering disciplines across TVETMARA institutions. The data were analysed thematically to capture recurring patterns in pedagogical reasoning and instructional decision-making. The findings indicate five interrelated pedagogical practices: the use of digital technologies to support meaningful learning and understanding; interdisciplinary integration across STEM domains; hands-on inquiry-based learning situated in real-world problem contexts; collaborative engagement among peers and learners; and lesson preparation that is closely aligned with industry standards and workplace expectations. Collectively, these practices highlight that digital technologies are employed not as isolated tools, but as integral components of context-sensitive STEM teaching. The study suggests that effective STEM pedagogy in TVET extends beyond access to digital tools, requiring educators to align technological use with pedagogical intent, disciplinary knowledge, and vocational realities. The findings offer reflective insights for curriculum development, teacher education, and policy initiatives aimed at strengthening STEM practices in vocational education.

References

Abd Hamid, H., Piahat, M. T., Azwan Haris, N. A. L., & Hassan, M. F. (2023). Shades of gray TVET in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6).https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/16747

Agyei, E., Darko Agyei, D., & Benning, I. (2022). In-service teachers’ preparedness and self-efficacy for technology integration in teaching. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2135851

Ali, M., Jaaffar, A. H., & Ali, M. A. (2021). Industry expectations of STEM graduates in Malaysian technical education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(3), 15–26. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/7720

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35913-1

Brianza, E., Schmid, M., Tondeur, J., & Petko, D. (2022). Situating TPACK: Context as a domain of teacher knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 707–714. https://citejournal.org/volume-22/issue-4-22/general/situating-tpack-context-as-a-domain-of-teacher-knowledge

Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Dayangku Suraya Awang Jafar, Muhammad Sukri Saud, Mohd Zolkifli Abd Hamid, Nornazira Suhairom, Mohd Hizwan Mohd Hisham, & Yasmin Hanafi Zaid. (2020). TVET teacher professional competency framework in industry 4.0 era. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1969–1979. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080534

Deák, C., Kumar, B., Szabó, I., Nagy, G., & Szentesi, S. (2021). Evolution of new approaches in pedagogy and STEM with inquiry-based learning and post-pandemic scenarios. Education Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070319

Desai, T., & Kulkarni, D. (2022). Assessment of interactive video to enhance learning experience: A case study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35, 74–80.

Economic Planning Unit. (2024). Malaysia Digital Economy Blueprint: Progress update. Prime Minister’s Department, Malaysia. https://www.epu.gov.my/en

Elías, M., Pérez, J., Cassot, M. del R., Carrasco, E. A., Tomljenovic, M., & Zúñiga, E. A. (2022). Development of digital and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics skills in chemistry teacher training. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.932609

Fadhilah Jamaluddin, A. Z., Razak, A., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2025). Navigating the challenges and future pathways of STEM education in the Asia-Pacific region: A scoping review. STEM Education, 5(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025004

Foi, L. Y., & Teah, T. H. (2022). STEM education in Malaysia: An organisational development approach? In International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education(Vol. 29).

Giang, N. T. C., Anh, N. T. Q., Dao, T. T., Tuan, P. A., Linh, C. T. H., & Chau, P. T. H. (2024). A systematic review of problem-solving skill development in STEM education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.1

Hafiz Salleh, M., Kadir, S. A., Jamaluddin, R., Hazwan, M., & Puad, M. (2022). Factors influencing TVET teacher’s TPACK competencies. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(3), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.03.010

Hubal, H., Siasiev, A., Sipii, V., & Burtovyi, S. (2024). Digital technologies in the process of teaching STEM disciplines: Challenges and prospects. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society, 17(1), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.n1.2024

Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Revolutionizing STEM education: Unleashing the potential of STEM interest careers in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i7/17608

Ismail, A. A., Hassan, R., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Digital competency framework in digital technology towards future industrial revolution in Malaysia. Voice of Academia, 21(2), 229–237. https://voa.uitm.edu.my

Jamil, M. R. M., Hashim, A. T. M., Othman, M. S., Ahmad, A. M., Noh, N. M., & Kamal, M. F. M. (2023). Digital pedagogy policy in Malaysian TVET: A fuzzy Delphi approach. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.02.001

Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686

Kamaruzaman, F. M., Nik Othman, N. N. J., & Omar, M. (2025). Future generic skills for technical vocational education graduates. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.15

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Naidoo, J., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of using the blended learning approach for stem-related subjects within the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.583

Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto, W., & Ramdani, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational high school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.645047

Phillips, M. (2016). Re-contextualising TPACK: Exploring teachers’ (non-)use of digital technologies. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(5), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1124803

Salleh, S. M., Musa, J., Jaidin, J. H., & Shahrill, M. (2021). Development of tvet teachers’ beliefs about technology enriched instruction through professional development workshops: Application of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(2), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2021.13.02.003

Sriboonruang, O., & Somsaman, K. (2025). Advancing integrated STEM Education in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). Southeast Asian Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 2–9.

Suhirman, S., & Prayogi, S. (2023). Overcoming challenges in STEM Education: A literature review that leads to effective pedagogy in STEM learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4715

Swallow, M. J., & Olofson, M. W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 228–244.

Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2021). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2010–2019). Sustainability, 13(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010012

Waters, C. C., & Orange, A. (2022). STEM-driven school culture: Pillars of a transformative STEM approach. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213550

Williams, T., Singer, J., Krikorian, J., Rakes, C., & Ross, J. (2019). Measuring pedagogy and the integration of engineering design in STEM classrooms. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 28(3), 179–194.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods(6th ed.). SAGE.