Rehearsal for reading comprehension: Sabahan schoolchildren use puppets and scripts to learn English

Tamara Dietrich Randolph

doi:10.51200/jpp.v2i1.8165

Authors

Tamara Dietrich Randolph

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v2i1.8165

Abstract

Fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students in a private rural school in Sabah, East Malaysia, participated in a 7-day pilot study to determine the efficacy of using puppets and natural science scripts in learning English. The experimental group read printed puppet scripts while listening to them on a battery-operated audiotape player, rehearsed several times while manipulating the puppets, and then presented to an audience of their peers. To minimize the Hawthorne effect, the control group was involved with distracter activities, such as creating some type of engaging craft object or listening to the researcher read an English-language illustrated story to them. Five students randomly chosen to be in the experimental group attained considerably higher average post-test than pre-test reading comprehension scores as well as slightly higher average post-test vocabulary scores on a standardized reading test. Average post-test scores for students in the control group stayed the same for reading comprehension and went down for vocabulary. The qualitative component of the study showed strong motivation and engagement on the part of the students who used puppets, suggesting that this approach may be valuable in teaching science terms to rural schoolchildren in Sabah.

References

Andersen, E. 1984. The acquisition of sociolinguistic knowledge: Some evidence from children’s verbal role-play. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 125–144.

Bennett, R. 2002. Teaching reading with puppets. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Stabilizing Indigenous Languages, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 11–14, 2000. Eric Document 42 242.

Bidwell, S. 1992. Ideas for using drama to enhance reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45, 653–654.

Blachowicz, C., and P. Fisher. 2000. Vocabulary instruction. In Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. III, ed. M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr, 503–523.

Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Carless, D. 2004. Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–662.

Garrett, K., R. Busby, and R. Pasnak. 1998. Paper presented at the 4th National Head Start Research Conference, Washington D.C., July 9–12. Eric Document 423 047.

Harmer, J. 2003. Popular culture, methods, and context. English Language Teaching Journal, 57, 288–294.

Keogh, B., S. Naylor, B. Downing, J. Maloney, and S. Simon. 2006. Puppets bringing stories to life in science. Primary Science Review, 92, 26–28.

Maloney, J., B. Keogh, S. Naylor, B. Downing, and S. Simon. 2006. Using puppets in the classroom to get children talking about their ideas. Teaching Earth Sciences, 30, 26.

Millican, J. 1991. Reading, Writing, and Cultivating: A resource book for post-literacy trainers based on experiences in Senegal. The Hague, Netherlands: Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries. ED 367 843.

Morrow, L., M. Pressley, J. Smith, and M. Smith. 1997. The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 54–76.

Myers, P. 2006. The Princess Storyteller, Clara Clarifier, Quincy Questioner, and the Wizard: Reciprocal teaching adapted for kindergarten students. The Reading Teacher, 59, 315–324.

Naylor, S., B. Keogh, B. Downing, J. Maloney, and S. Simon. 2007. The Puppets Project: Using puppets to promote engagement and talk in science. In Contributions from Science Education Research, ed. R. Pinto and D. Couso, 289–296.

Neuman, S., and P. Koskinen. 1992. Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 94–106.

Peck, S., and A. Virkler. 2006. Reading in the shadows: Extending literacy skills through shadow-puppet theatre. The Reading Teacher, 59, pp. 786–795.

Randolph, T. 2001. Using illustrated Chinese folktales with adult language learners in China. Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL, 7, 56–75.

Saad, M. 1993. History, dreams and reality: Storytelling programmes in Malaysia. Paper from the 22nd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship, Adelaide, South Australia, Sept. 27–30. Eric Document 399 937.

Samuels, S. 2002. Reading fluency: Its development and assessment. In What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction, ed. A. Farstrup and S. Samuels, 166–183. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Samuels, S., and A. Farstrup. 2006. What research has to say about fluency instruction. Newark,DE: International Reading Association.

Summak, M., E. Summak, and M. Gür. 1994. Drama behind the curtain: Shadow theatre in ESL/EFL classes. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), March 1–2,1994. Eric Document 375 628.

Szarkowicz, D. 1999. Monsters, bananas, and seaweed: Active participation and young children’s understanding of false belief. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 15–18, 1999.

Woodcock, R.W. 1997. Woodcock Diagnostic Reading Battery. Illinois: Riverside Publishing, Houghton Mifflin Company.

Yawkey, T. 1979. Let’s pretend play as language learning. Reading Improvement, 16, 130–133.