A study to determine the supporting tools of information and communication technology (ICT) in creativity among student teachers of a public university in Sabah, Malaysia

Authors

  • Tan Choon Keong
  • Lee Kean Weh
  • Dg Norizah Ag Kiflee @ Dzulkifli
  • Soon Singh Bikar Singh
  • Roslee Talip
  • Pathmanathan K. Suppiah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v2i1.8167

Keywords:

creativity, support tools, ICT, models of creativity, usage of ICT

Abstract

Creativity is an essential competence through which people can develop their potential to use their imagination to express themselves, and make original and valued choices in their lives. The growing interest and concern in cultivating creativity has prompted much education reforms being undertaken in a number of countries, particularly Malaysia. Creative teaching and reflective practice are the two most important milestones that teachers aspire to attain. This study explores the role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in supporting the creativity process of a group of student teachers in a public university in Sabah, Malaysia. The use of ICT includes collecting relevant information or knowledge to scaffold the revision of existing ideas and development of innovative concepts and hence, possible innovations and inventions. The researchers identify ten most important tasks for the student teachers where ICT application is most appropriate. This is to identify what ICT software is most frequently used and important for the creativity work of each student teacher. Then, the usage of ICT is mapped to the Loveless's Model of Five Elements of Creativity. Results showed that ICT plays an important role, as specified in the Model, in supporting the creativity process of student teachers while completing the ten important tasks. The study suggests that the Ministry of Education, universities or institutions of higher learning stress the importance of computer literacy education for secondary school students. The training should focus on data/information searching strategies via the Web, data arrangement, sorting and analysis (computational software) and graphical as well presentational software. The training should preferably be completed prior to the students entering the universities for further studies. 

References

Alfreda. 2007. Poetry about creativity. Colorado, USA: Lamp Light Press Denver.

Amabile, T. 1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

DeBono, E. 1990. Lateral thinking. London: Penguin.

Dillenbourg, P. 1999. Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier Science/Pergamon.

Fetterman, D. M. 1998. Webs of meaning: Computer and internet resources for educational research and instruction. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 22–30.

Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

———. 1993. Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

Lesgold, A. 1993. Information technologiesand the future of education. In Computers as cognitive tools, ed. S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry, 369–383. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Loveless, A. M. 2002. Literature review in creativity, new technologies and learning. A Report for NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved from: http://www.nestafuturelab. org/reviews/cr01.htm

Merriam Online Dictionary. 2006. Retrieved from: http://www.m-w.com

Rhodes, M. 1961. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

Shneiderman, B. 2000. Supporting creativity with powerful composition tools for artifacts and performances. Paper presented at the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.

———. 2002a. Leonard’s laptop: Human needs and the New Computing Technologies Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

———. 2002b. Creativity support tools. Communications of the ACM, 45(10),116–120.

Stein, M. I. 2004. Creativity and the teacher. In Creativity for teachers, ed. Tan, A. G. and Law, L. C. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.

Torrance, E. P. 1990. The Torrance tests of creative thinking:Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

Torrance, E. P., O. E. Ball, and H. T. Safter. 1992. Torrance tests of creative thinking streamlined scoring guide, Figural A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

Treffinger, D. J. and S. G. Isaksen. 2001. Teaching for creative learning and problem solving. In Developing mind: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.), ed. A. L. Costa, 442–445. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wallas, G. 1926. The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt.

Wheeler, S., S. J. Waite, and C. Bromfield. 2001. Promoting creative thinking through the use of Web based learning resources. Retrieved from: http://rilw.emp.paed.uni-muenchen.de/2001/papers/wheeler1.pdf

Published

2010-12-31

How to Cite

Tan Choon Keong, Lee Kean Weh, Dg Norizah Ag Kiflee @ Dzulkifli, Soon Singh Bikar Singh, Roslee Talip, & Pathmanathan K. Suppiah. (2010). A study to determine the supporting tools of information and communication technology (ICT) in creativity among student teachers of a public university in Sabah, Malaysia. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 2(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v2i1.8167
Total Views: 3 | Total Downloads: 6