Pembelajaran topik Dunia melalui Deria Kita menerusi pendekatan kecerdasan pelbagai: Learning the topic the World through Our Senses using the multiple intelligences approach

Noor Baizura Bahrun; Mohd. Ali Samsudin; Noor Hasyimah Haniza

doi:10.51200/jpp.v6i1.8223

Authors

Noor Baizura Bahrun
Mohd. Ali Samsudin
Noor Hasyimah Haniza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v6i1.8223

Keywords:

kecerdasan pelbagai, pembelajaran Sains

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pendekatan kecerdasan pelbagai terhadap pencapaian murid Tingkatan Dua dalam topik 'Dunia Melalui Deria Kita'. Sampel kajian adalah seramai 60 orang murid Tingkatan Dua iaitu seramai 30 orang murid bagi kumpulan eksperimen iaitu murid yang mengikuti rancangan pelajaran yang terancang berdasarkan pendekatan kecerdasan pelbagai dan 30 orang murid lagi bagi kumpulan kawalan yang mengikuti pengajaran secarà, konvensional. Untuk mengenal pasti kesan jenis pendekatan pengajaran terhadap pencapaian murid, ujian pra bagi topik 'Dunia Melalui Deria Kita' ditadbir sebelum rawatan dijalankan. Manakala, ujian pasca bagi topik yang sama pula ditadbir selepas rawatan dijalankan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan Analisis Kovarians (ANCOVA). Dapatan kajian mendapati bahawa pendekatan kecerdasan pelbagai berkesan dalam meningkatkan pencapaian murid dalam topik 'Dunia Melalui Deria Kita'. Justeru, guru-guru disarankan untuk melaksanakan pengajaran Sains dengan mengambil kira kecerdasan murid yang pelbagai melalui pendekatan kecerdasan pelbagai.

This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of the Multiple Intelligences approach on Form Two students’ achievement in the topic “The World Through Our Senses.” The study sample consisted of 60 Form Two students, comprising 30 students in the experimental group who participated in a structured lesson plan based on the Multiple Intelligences approach and another 30 students in the control group who received conventional instruction. To determine the effect of the instructional approach on students’ achievement, a pre-test on the topic “The World Through Our Senses” was administered before the intervention, while a post-test on the same topic was administered after the intervention. Data were analysed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). The findings indicated that the Multiple Intelligences approach was effective in improving students’ achievement in the topic “The World Through Our Senses.” Therefore, teachers are encouraged to implement Science instruction by taking into consideration students’ diverse intelligences through the Multiple Intelligences approach.

References

Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Seven ways to approach curriculum. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 26-28.

Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: Ascd.

Baum, S., Viens, J., & Slatin, B. (2005). Multiple intelligences in the classroom: A teacher’s guide. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

Douglas, O., Burton, K. S., & Reese-Durham, N. (2008). The effects of the multiple intelligence teaching strategy on the academic achievement of eighth grade math Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2).

Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research, and practice. In National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal 13(1), 3-22. Retrieved from ProQuest Education Journal Database.

Fleetham, M. (2006). Multiple intelligences in practice: Enhancing Self-Esteem and Learning in the Classroom. Stafford England: Network Continuum Education.

Gangi, S. (2011). Differentiating instruction using multiple intelligences in the elementary school: a literature review (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Stout, United States).

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Green, S. M., Salkind, N. J. & Akey, T. M. (1997). Using SPSS for windows: Analysing and understanding data. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: quantitative and aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149.

Hodson, D., & Reid, D. (1988). Changing priorities in science education. School Science, 70(250), 101-108. doi: 10.1080/0950069920140506

Kaya, O. N. (2008). How Is a Science Lesson Developed and Implemented Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory?. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 155-167.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Lantz, H. B. (2004). Rubrics for assessing student achievement in science grades K-12. United States: Corwin Press.

Lockwood, A. T. (1993). Multiple intelligences theory in action: Research and the Classroom. United States: University of Wisconsin-Madison.

McCarthy, J. P. & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 279-294.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London, School of Education.

Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02504545

Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (2006). Orchestrating multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 64(1),22-27.

Nor Azan. (2005). Pembangunan dan keperluan perisian kursus adaptif multimedia (A-Maths): Rekabentuk berasaskan stail pembelajaran (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi).

Ozdemir, P. I., Guneysu, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enhancing learning through. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 74-78. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2006.9656017

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Sukatan Pelajaran Sains KBSM . Kuala Lumpur:

Reinhartz, J. & Beach, D. M. (1998). Teaching and learning in the elementary school: Focus on Curriculum. New Jersey: Merrill.

Saban, A. (2001). The theory of multiple intelligences and education: Special Esentepe Elementary School instance. Selcuk University Journal of Education, 11, 45-67.

Saban, A. (2011). an evaluation of the teaching activities implemented in the elementary science and technology courses in terms of multiple intelligence theory: a sample from Adana. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 859 - 876.

Sarrazine, A. R. (2005). Addressing astronomy misconceptions and achieving national science standards utilizing aspects of multiple intelligences theory in the classroom and the planetarium (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University,United States).

Sloan, K. (2004). Between the “inputs and “outputs”: Assessing the effects of high-stakes accountability on educational quality. Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth, 136-160. Retrieved from ProQuest Educational Database.

Thompson, B. R., & MacDougall, G. D. (2002). Intelligent Teaching Using the theory of multiple intelligences in the inquiry classroom. Science Teacher- Washington, 69(1), 44-48.

Wiles, J. & Bondi, J. (1998). Curriculum development: A guide to practice (5th ed). New Jersey: Merrill.

Yap Wei Li (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centred teaching classroom using multimedia-mediated learning module. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 6(2).

Yetisir (2014). The Multilevel Effects of Student and Classroom Factors on the Science.