Kajian keberkesanan prinsip momentum-impuls bagi mata pelajaran Fizik SPM: A study on the effectiveness of the momentum–impulse principle in SPM Physics

Nik Syahrudin Nik Daud; Mohd. Mustamam Abd. Karim; Nor Lelawati Hassan; Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman

doi:10.51200/jpp.v6i1.8225

Authors

Nik Syahrudin Nik Daud
Mohd. Mustamam Abd. Karim
Nor Lelawati Hassan
Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v6i1.8225

Keywords:

momentum, impuls, Pendidikan Fizik, Prinsip Momentum Impuls (PMI)

Abstract

Kajian ini dijalankan untuk mengkaji kebekersanan penggunaan Prinsip Momentum-Impuls (PMI) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) Fizik tingkatan empat bagi topik Momentum Linear dan Perlanggaran. Responden kajian melibatkan 54 orang pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sains Sekolah Berasrama Penuh Integrasi Rawang dengan kumpulan rawatan 27 orang pelajar dan 27 orang lagi adalah kumpulan kawalan. Kumpulan rawatan diajar menggunakan modul PMI yang diperoleh daripada laman web "The Physics Classroom" dan kandungannya telah disahkan oleh dua orang guru pakar fizik. Modul ini dipilih kerana susunan kandungan yang baik, bahasa yang mudah difahami, bersifat interaktif dan berkait dengan topik sebelumnya iaitu graf gerakan linear dengan penggunaan pita detik. Konsep 'lantunan' yang terdapat dalam modul ini dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih jelas tentang kaitan momentum dan impuls serta kebanyakan latihan yang diberikan berbentuk kualitatif aras tinggi (menganalisis dan mengevaluasi). Kumpulan kawalan pula diajar menggunakan buku teks fizik tingkatan empat berdasarkan huraian sukatan pelajaran fizik sedia ada. Alat kajian yang digunakan ialah Ujian Keberkesanan Penggunaan Prinsip Momentum-Impuls (UKPPMI) yang telah diujirintis dengan nilai alpha Cronbach, a = 0.996. Data dianalisis dengan berbantukan perisian SPSS dan Microsoft Excel. Analisis Statististik Deskriptif menunjukkan min pencapaian kumpulan rawatan ialah 69.67 dengan SD skor 16.946. Manakala, min pencapaian kumpulan kawalan ialah 48.07 dengan SD skor 13.806. Ini menunjukkan pencapaian kumpulan rawatan adalah lebih tinggi berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan. Tambahan pula, soal selidik keberkesanan penggunaan modul PMI ke atas kumpulan rawatan mendapati sebanyak 65.4% responden bersetuju bahawa penggunaan modul PMI memberi kesan positif dan pemahaman yang lebih baik mengenai topik Momentum Linear dan Perlanggaran. Dapatan kajian memberi implikasi bahawa penggunaan PMI dicadangkan dalam PdP bagi topik Momentum Linear dan Perlanggaran.

This study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of using the Momentum–Impulse Principle (MIP) in the teaching and learning of Form Four Physics, specifically the topics of Linear Momentum and Collisions. The respondents consisted of 54 Form Four science-stream students from Sekolah Berasrama Penuh Integrasi Rawang, with 27 students assigned to the treatment group and another 27 students to the control group. The treatment group was taught using a MIP module obtained from The Physics Classroom website, and its content was validated by two expert Physics teachers. The module was selected because of its well-structured content, easy-to-understand language, interactive features, and connection to the preceding topic of linear motion graphs using ticker tape. The concept of “bouncing” presented in the module provided students with a clearer understanding of the relationship between momentum and impulse, while most of the exercises were qualitative higher-order thinking tasks involving analysis and evaluation. The control group was taught using the Form Four Physics textbook based on the existing Physics syllabus. The research instrument used was the Momentum–Impulse Principle Usage Effectiveness Test (MIPUET), which had been piloted and obtained a Cronbach’s alpha value of α = 0.996. Data were analysed using SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistical analysis showed that the treatment group obtained a mean achievement score of 69.67 with a standard deviation of 16.946, whereas the control group obtained a mean achievement score of 48.07 with a standard deviation of 13.806. This indicates that the treatment group achieved higher scores than the control group. Furthermore, a questionnaire examining the effectiveness of the MIP module among the treatment group found that 65.4% of respondents agreed that the use of the MIP module had a positive effect and provided better understanding of the topics of Linear Momentum and Collisions. The findings imply that the use of the MIP is recommended in the teaching and learning of Linear Momentum and Collisions.

References

Armstrong, T. (1994). Multiple intelligences: Seven ways to approach curriculum. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 26-28.

Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. Alexandria, Virginia: Ascd.

Baum, S., Viens, J., & Slatin, B. (2005). Multiple intelligences in the classroom: A teacher’s guide. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

Douglas, O., Burton, K. S., & Reese-Durham, N. (2008). The effects of the multiple intelligence teaching strategy on the academic achievement of eighth grade math Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2).

Dunn, R. (2000). Learning styles: Theory, research, and practice. In National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal 13(1), 3-22. Retrieved from ProQuest Education Journal Database.

Fleetham, M. (2006). Multiple intelligences in practice: Enhancing Self-Esteem and Learning in the Classroom. Stafford England: Network Continuum Education.

Gangi, S. (2011). Differentiating instruction using multiple intelligences in the elementary school: a literature review (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Stout, United States).

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

Green, S. M., Salkind, N. J. & Akey, T. M. (1997). Using SPSS for windows: Analysing and understanding data. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: quantitative and aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149.

Hodson, D., & Reid, D. (1988). Changing priorities in science education. School Science, 70(250), 101-108. doi: 10.1080/0950069920140506

Kaya, O. N. (2008). How Is a Science Lesson Developed and Implemented Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory?. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34, 155-167.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Lantz, H. B. (2004). Rubrics for assessing student achievement in science grades K-12. United States: Corwin Press.

Lockwood, A. T. (1993). Multiple intelligences theory in action: Research and the Classroom. United States: University of Wisconsin Madison.

McCarthy, J. P. & Anderson, L. (2000). Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 279-294.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London, School of Education.

Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02504545

Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (2006). Orchestrating multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 64(1),22-27.

Nor Azan. (2005). Pembangunan dan keperluan perisian kursus adaptif multimedia (A-Maths): Rekabentuk berasaskan stail pembelajaran (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi).

Ozdemir, P. I., Gunesyu, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enhancing learning through. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 74-78. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2006.9656017

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Sukatan Pelajaran Sains KBSM . Kuala Lumpur:

Reinhartz, J. & Beach, D. M. (1998). Teaching and learning in the elementary school: Focus on Curriculum. New Jersey: Merrill.

Saban, A. (2001). The theory of multiple intelligences and education: Special Esentepe Elementary School instance. Selcuk University Journal of Education, 11, 45-67.

Saban, A. (2011). an evaluation of the teaching activities implemented in the elementary science and technology courses in terms of multiple intelligence theory: a sample from Adana. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 859 - 876.

Sarrazine, A. R. (2005). Addressing astronomy misconceptions and achieving national science standards utilizing aspects of multiple intelligences theory in the classroom and the planetarium (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University,United States).

Sloan, K. (2004). Between the “inputs and “outputs”: Assessing the effects of high-stakes accountability on educational quality. Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth, 136-160. Retrieved from ProQuest Educational Database.

Thompson, B. R., & MacDougall, G. D. (2002). Intelligent Teaching Using the theory of multiple intelligences in the inquiry classroom. Science Teacher- Washington, 69(1), 44-48.

Wiles, J. & Bondi, J. (1998). Curriculum development: A guide to practice (5th ed). New Jersey: Merrill.

Yap Wei Li (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centred teaching classroom using multimedia-mediated learning module. International Journal of Information and Educational Technology, 6(2).

Yetisir (2014). The Multilevel Effects of Student and Classroom Factors on the Science Achievement of Eighth Graders in Turkey. Education and Science, 39(7),108-120.