Pola dan trenda dalam penyelidikan berkaitan dengan kreativiti atau pemikiran kreatif pada peringkat pasca ijazah di Malaysia
Patterns and trends in research on creativity or creative thinking at the postgraduate level in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v7i1.8235Keywords:
pascasiswazah, pola dan trenda, kreativiti, pemikiran kreatif, KBKK, KBATAbstract
Kesedaran tentang kepentingan pemikiran kreatif dalam kurikulum sekolah di Malaysia telah wujud sejak tahun 1983, bermula dengan Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah (KBSR) dan dilangsungkan awal 1990an dengan Kurikulum Bersepadu di mana pemikiran kreatif disebatikan sebagai salah satu komponen dalam Kemahiran Berfikir secara Kritis dan Kreatif (KBKK). Kini, pemikiran kreatif terus disebatikan dalam Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) untuk pelajaran sekolah menengah. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk meninjau sebarang pola dan trenda berkaitan dengan penyelidikan tentang kreativiti atau pemikiran kreatif yang dapat diakses dari pangkalan data elektronik di Pusat Dokumentasi Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (BPPDP) dalam Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.Kaedah kajian sejarah berbentuk analisis tajuk tesis dan dokumen (tesis) dari tahun 1979 sehingga Julai 2015 dilaksanakan dan statistik perihalan digunakan untuk memperihalkan pola dan trenda. Antara 278 tesis pengajian tinggi yang dianalisis, hanya 65 tesis adalah tesis pasca ijazah dan jumlah ini merangkumi 51 (18.4%) tesis ijazah sarjana dan 14 (5.0%) tesis ijazah kedoktoran. KBKK merupakan tema am yang terpilih di peringkat ijazah sarjana manakala kreativiti atau pemikiran kreatif menjadi tema am yang paling disukai penyelidik kedoktoran. Para pelajar (31 kajian) dan guru (22 kajian) merupakan kategori responden yang paling kerap diselidiki manakala bilangan responden atau sasaran lain seperti guru pelatih, pentadbir, responden kumpulan lain adalah tidak signifikan. Secara keseluruhan, dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa bilangan tesis kedoktoran dalam kreativiti atau pemikiran kreativiti sama ada dalam bentuk "pengintegrasian" (KBKK/KBAT) atau secara terasing (stand alone) adalah sangat terhad.
Awareness of the importance of creative thinking in the Malaysian school curriculum has existed since 1983, beginning with the New Primary School Curriculum (KBSR) and continuing in the early 1990s with the Integrated Curriculum, in which creative thinking was incorporated as one of the components of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills (KBKK). Currently, creative thinking continues to be integrated into the Standard Primary School Curriculum (KSSR) and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in secondary education. This study aimed to examine patterns and trends in research on creativity or creative thinking accessible through the electronic database of the Documentation Centre of the Educational Policy Planning and Research Division (BPPDP) within the Ministry of Education Malaysia. A historical research method involving an analysis of thesis titles and documents (theses) from 1979 to July 2015 was employed, and descriptive statistics were used to describe the patterns and trends. Of the 278 higher education theses analysed, only 65 were postgraduate theses, comprising 51 (18.4%) master’s theses and 14 (5.0%) doctoral theses. KBKK was the most commonly selected general theme at the master’s level, whereas creativity or creative thinking was the most preferred general theme among doctoral researchers. Students (31 studies) and teachers (22 studies) were the most frequently studied respondent categories, while other respondent groups such as trainee teachers, administrators, and other groups were not significant in number. Overall, the findings showed that the number of doctoral theses on creativity or creative thinking, whether in an integrated form (KBKK/HOTS) or as a standalone area, was very limited.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press.
Amin Senin et al. (2011). The new IPG: Learner centered university. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (BPK). (2010). Buku panduan kreativiti: Pembangunan dan amalan dalam pengajaran. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan (BPPDP). (2015). Kreativiti dan pemikiran kreatif. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1—Cognitive domain. Longman.
Bridgman, R. (2002). 1000 inventions & discoveries. A Penguin Company.
Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture and person: A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins.
Hayes, D. P. (2006). Inspiring primary teaching insights into excellent primary practice. Learning Matters Ltd.
Kamus Dewan. (2013). Kamus Dewan (Edisi ke-4). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2012). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013–2025. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Lembaga Peperiksaan (LP). (2013). Pentaksiran kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lim, D. C. H. (2007). HBEF 4106 school based research. Open University Malaysia.
Majority back change in format. (2014, December 24). The Star, Nation, p. 3.
Mohd Azhar Abd Hamid. (2004). Kreativiti: Konsep, teori & praktis. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Mohd Azhar Abd Hamid, Mohd Koharuddin Balwi, & Muhamed Fauzi Gunman. (2006). Reka cipta & inovasi dalam perspektif kreativiti. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rajendran, N. S. (2013). Teaching & acquiring higher-order thinking skills: Theory and practice. Sultan Idris Education University.
Robinson, K. (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. Report of the National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education, DfEE.
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Elsevier Academic Press.
Safina Ramli. (2016, March 14). Malaysia perlu lebih ramai guru kreatif dan inovatif—Mahdzir. Utusan Melayu. http://www.moe.gov.my/my/keratan-akhbar
Sigelman, C., & Rider, E. A. (2014). Life-span human development (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). A triarchic theory of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. Plume.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292–316.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 722–788.
The Guardian. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Which country does best at reading, mathematics and science? http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/dec/03/pisa-results-country-best-reading-maths-science
TIMSS and PIRLS. (2011). TIMSS 2011. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/data-release-2011/pdf/Overview-TIMSS-and-PIRLS2011-Achievement.pdf
Utusan Online. (2009). 2010 Tahun kreativiti dan inovasi. http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.aspy=2009&dt=0122&sec=Dalam_Negeri&pg=dn_01.htm
What is Wawasan 2020? (1996). The way forward: Vision 2020. http://www.wawasan2020.com/vision/p32.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Chew Eng Sun , Ahmad Rizal Madar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



