STRATEGIC ANALYSIS USING SWOT/TOWS-AHP: AN APPLICATION ON EDUCATORS JOB PERFORMANCE IN SABAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jaaab.7838Keywords:
Educators’ Job Performance, SWOT/TOWS Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Educational Development, Sabah Education SystemAbstract
This study examines educators’ job performance in Sabah, Malaysia, using an integrated SWOT/TOWS-AHP approach to identify strategic priorities for improving educational outcomes. Data were collected through focus group discussions involving educators, administrators, and policymakers to identify the key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats affecting teacher performance. The SWOT findings revealed strengths such as strong cultural adaptability, multilingual competency, and community engagement, while weaknesses included inadequate infrastructure, limited professional development opportunities, high teacher-student ratios, and teacher burnout. Opportunities were identified in digital education expansion, government-NGO collaborations, and growing emphasis on STEM education, whereas threats included funding constraints, urban-rural disparities, policy instability, and negative perceptions of the teaching profession. The TOWS matrix was subsequently employed to formulate strategic alternatives, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to prioritize these strategies based on expert evaluations. The results indicated that reducing teacher workload through AI-powered grading and administrative tools emerged as the highest-priority strategy (22.3%), followed by the development of culturally responsive digital teaching modules (16.6%) and policy stability initiatives (14.5%). The study provides a practical and evidence-based framework to support policymakers, school administrators, and educators in enhancing teacher performance and promoting equitable educational development across Sabah.
References
Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148
Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juizo, D. (2011). Strategic implementation of integrated water resources management in Mozambique: An AHP-based prioritization. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36(14–15), 1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.040
Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., & Pykäläinen, J. (2003). AHP-based decision analysis for stakeholder involvement in forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00064-6
Lada, S., Chekima, B., Ansar, R., Lim, M. F., Bouteraa, M., Abdul Adis, A.-A., Abd Karim, M. R., & Yong, K. (2024). Strategic alternatives for Muslim-friendly homestay in Sabah Malaysia: A SWOT/TOWS analysis. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(6), 1534–1559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2022-0218
Namugenyi, C., Nimmagadda, S. L., & Reiners, T. (2019). Design of a SWOT analysis model and its evaluation in diverse digital business ecosystems. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1609061
Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sakarji, S. R., Azib, W. N. H. W., Luqman, A., Nooradzlina, N., Shari, A. S., Ismail,
H. F., Thani, A. K. A., Min, N. M. F. N., Ishak, M. a. H., & Yusri, N. a. a. M. (2021). Job satisfaction and individual happiness among employees at a public higher education institution. Social and Management Research Journal, 18(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v18i2.14908
Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix: A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 © Universiti Malaysia Sabah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



