Pengaruh minat murid, sokongan ibu bapa dan kompetensi guru terhadap penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum: The influence of students’ interest, parental support and teacher competency on students’ involvement in co-curricular activities

Sheila  Micheal

doi:10.51200/jpp.v11i1.4284

Authors

Sheila Micheal Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v11i1.4284

Keywords:

kokurikulum, minat murid, sokongan ibu bapa, kompetensi guru, co-curriculum, student interest, parental support, teacher competence

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan dan pengaruh minat murid, sokongan ibu bapa dan kompetensi guru terhadap penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum sekolah menengah di Sabah. Kajian kuantitatif ini mengaplikasikan kaedah tinjauan dan menggunakan borang soal selidik untuk memungut data daripada 492 murid sekolah menengah sebagai sampel. Data tersebut dianalisis menggunakan perisian IBM-SPSS-AMOS 25. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan minat murid, sokongan ibu bapa, kompetensi guru dan penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum berada pada tahap tinggi. Ujian Korelasi Pearson pula menunjukkan wujudnya hubungan positif yang signifikan antara minat murid (r=0.114, p<0.05), sokongan ibu bapa (r=0.620, p<0.01) dan kompetensi guru (r=0.263, p<0.01) dengan penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum. Analisis Laluan SEM menunjukkan bahawa minat murid dan sokongan ibu bapa mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan. variabel bebas tersebut mampu meramal penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum pada kadar 62%. Menerusi analisis SEM, kajian ini juga berjaya membangunkan satu cadangan model penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum yang menggabungkan variabel bebas tersebut sebagai faktor utama kepada penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum. Dapatan-dapatan kajian ini adalah bukti empirikal bahawa penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dapat ditingkatkan menerusi minat murid, sokongan ibu bapa dan kompetensi guru. Oleh itu, hasil kajian ini diharap boleh menjadi panduan kepada semua pihak yang terlibat secara langsung atau tidak langsung dalam sistem pendidikan sekolah menengah dan mampu meningkatkan penglibatan murid dalam aktiviti kokurikulum pada masa yang akan datang.

This study aims to identify the relationship and influence of students' interest, parental support, and teacher competence on students' involvement in co-curricular activities in secondary schools in Sabah. This quantitative study applies a survey method and uses questionnaires to collect data from 492 secondary school students as samples. The data was analyzed using IBM-SPSS-AMOS 25 software. Descriptive analysis showed that students' interest, parental support, teacher competence, and students' involvement in co-curricular activities were at a high level. Pearson Correlation tests also showed a significant positive relationship between students' interest (r=0.114, p<0.05), parental support (r=0.620, p<0.01), and teacher competence (r=0.263, p<0.01) with students' involvement in co-curricular activities. SEM path analysis shows that students' interest and parental support have a significant impact. These independent variables can predict students' involvement in co-curricular activities at a rate of 62%. Through SEM analysis, this study also managed to develop a proposed model of student involvement in co-curricular activities that incorporates these independent variables as the main factors influencing student participation. The findings of this study provide empirical evidence that students' involvement in co-curricular activities can be increased through student interest, parental support, and teacher competence. Therefore, the results of this study are hoped to serve as a guide for everyone involved, directly or indirectly, in the secondary school education system and could help boost student participation in co-curricular activities in the future.

References

Abraham, S. E., Karns, L. A., Shaw, K. & Mena, M. A. (2001). Managerial Competencies and the Managerial Performance Appraisal Process. Journal of Management Development,20, 842-852.

Adeyemi, B. A. & Farayola, J. A. (2014). Relationship Between Life Satisfaction, Social Interest and Participation in Extra Curricula Activities among Undergraduates in a Nigeria University. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: A Arts & Humanities –Psychology, 14(4).

Ag Marsanto & Cepi Safruddin Abdul Jabar. (2019). TheInfluence of Teacher Leadership and Extracurricular Activities on Student Discipline in Pangudi Luhur Junior High School Klaten Regency. International Conference on Meaningful Education, KnE Social Sciences,71–80.

Ahmad, N. & Khalid, F. (2017). Kesan Gamifikasi dalam Pendidikan Mempengaruhi Tahap Motivasi dan Penglibatan Pelajar. Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21: Trend Integrasi Teknologi, 157–163.

Aksan, N. & Kisac, B. (2009). A descriptive study: Reading comprehension and cognitive awareness skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 834-837.

Anderson, J. C., Funk, J. B., Elliott, R. & Smith, P. H. (2003). Parental support and pressure and children’s extracurricular activities: Relationships with the amount of involvement and affective experience of participation. Applied Developmental Psychology,24, 241–257.

Ang Chen. (1996). Student Interest in Activities in a Secondary Physical Education Curriculum: An Analysis of Student Subjectivity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(4), 424-432.

Ansari, A., Harbi, F. A., Abdel, A., W., Abdel, S., M., Tantawi,M. M. & El Refae, I. (2015). Factors Affecting Student Participation in Extra Curricular Activities: A Comparison Between Two Middle Eastern Dental Schools. The Saudi Dental Journal.

Ashbourne, D. & Andres, L. (2015). Athletics, Music, Languages and Leadership: How Parents Influence the Extracurricular Activities of their Children. Canadian Journal of Education, 38, 1-34.

Barnes, G. M., Reifman, A. S., Farrell, M. R & Dintcheff, B. A. (2000). The effects of parenting on the development of adolescent alcohol misuse: A six-wave latent growth model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62,175-186.

Birzea, C. (2004). Education for Democratic Citizenship Activities 2001-2004: All European study on EDC policies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2002). School Leadership: Concepts and Evidence. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.2nd Edition. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13).

Danim, S. (2011). Pengembangan Profesi Guru: Dari Pra Jabatan, Induksi, ke Profesional Madani. Kencana Prenada Media Group,Jakarta. hlm. 111.

Das, P. K. & Patnaik, S. (2007). Parental support and development of peer social status among children in India. Illinois Child Welfare, Volume 3, Numbers 1 and 2.

Domingues, M. & Gonçalves, C. (2013). The Role of Parents in Talented Youth Sport. Does Context Matter? Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism. 20.

Dunn, J. S., Kinney, D. A. & Hofferth, S. L. (2003). Parental ideologies and children's after-school activities. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1359–1386.

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation(pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Elliott, S. & Drummond, M. (2017). The experience of parent/coaches in youthsport: A qualitative exploration of junior Australian football. Journal of Amateur Sport. 3. 1-34.

Emmer, R. (2010). Community Service. New York, NY: Rosen Publishing Group.

Fletcher, A.C., Elder, G.H. & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influence on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 29–48.

Goodman, M. & James, I. (2017). Parental involvement in young footballer's development -a comparison of the opinions of children and their parents. Sports and Exercise Psychology Review,13,2-9.

Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M. & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282-313.

Haslinda, H., Siti Noriam, Y. & Mohd Radzani, A. R. (2015). Kompetensi Guru Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Kokurikulum Murid Di Sekolah Menengah. Simposium Pendidikan di Peribadikan. Perspektif Risalah An-Nur(SPRiN2017).

Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.

Holt, N. L., Tamminen, K. A., Black, D. E., Sehn, Z. L. & Wall, M. P. (2008). Parental involvement in competitive youth sport settings. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 663-685.

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement inchildren’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97, 310–331.

Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. & Sandler, H. M. (2005). The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement.Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.

Huebner, A. J. & Mancini, J. A. (2003). Shaping structured out-of-school time use among youth: The effects of self, family, and friend systems. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,32, 453–463.

Husted, P. D., Mason, R. E. &Adams, E. (2003). Cooperative OccupationalEducation: Including Internships, Apprenticeships, and Tech-prep: PrenticeHall.

Hooper, K., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling; Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods,6(1), 53 –60.

Jamalullail Abdul Wahab & Azhar Abdul Kadir. (2008). Kajian faktor-faktor keberkesanan pelaksanaan pengurusan kokurikulum daripada persepsi guru penolong kanak sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 8(1): 20-36.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1–7.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Aktiviti Kokurikulum. Bahagian Kokurikulum dan Kesenian.

Keser, F., Akar, H. & Yildirim, A. (2011). The role of extracurricular activities in active citizenship education.Journal of Curriculum Studies,43(6), 809-837.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York.

Knight, C. J., Boden, C. M. & Holt, N. L. (2010). Junior Tennis Players’ Preferences for Parental Behaviors. Journal of Applied Sport, 22, 377-391.

Levenson, A. R., Stede, W. A. V. & Cohen, S. G. (). Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance. Journal of Management, 32, 360. Saga Publication.

Loehlin, J. C. & Beaujean, A. (2016). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction To Factor, Path And Structural Equation Analysis. Fifth Edition.

MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods,4, 84-99.

Md. Roknuzzaman Siddiky. (2020). Examining The Linkage Between Student’s Participation In Co-curricular Activities And their Soft Skill Development. Journal of Education Sciences,4(3), 511-528.

Mohanaraju Annamalai. (2012). Pengaruh Sokongan Keluarga dalam Penglibatan Ko-kurikulum Sekolah terhadap Pencapaian Kemahiran Insaniah Murid. Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA.

Mohd Fazli Hasan, Suhaida Abdul Kadir & Soaib Asimiran. (2013). Hubungan Persekitaran Sekolah dengan Penglibatan Pelajar dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia,38(2), 1-9.

Mook Soon Sang. (2011). Pengurusan Kokurikulum. Puchong, Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.

Norlena Salamuddin, Mohd Taib Harun & Nur Asmara Diana Abdullah. (2011). Teachers’ Competency in School Extra-Curricular Management Ministry of Education, Putrajaya Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal,15, 49–55.

Nur Munirah Roslan & Mohamad Shukri Abdul Hamid. (2020). The Effectiveness of Cocurricular Activities By Integrated Living Skills Unit In Enhancing Student’s Soft Skills. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(4), 162-172.

Othman, R. (2016). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penglibatan Pelajar Dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum di Politeknik Tuanku Sultanah Bahiyah,1, 91–100.

Ozcelik, G. & Ferman, M. (2006). Competency Approach to Human Resources Management: Outcomes and Contributions in a Turkish Cultural Context. Human Resource Development Review, 5(1), 72–91.

Perino, K. R. (2000). Parent involvement and extracurricular activities: Their effects on the academic achievement of high school students. Ann Harbor, MI: Bell & Howell Information & Learning Company.

Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development(pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ransdell, L. B., Oakland, D. & Taylor, A. (2003). Increasing physical education activity in girl and women. Lessons learned from the DAMET project. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,74,(1),37-44.

Rasyidi, A. & Siti, A. I. (2020). Persepsi Pensyarah Dan Pelajar Terhadap Amalan Pengurusan Kokurikulum Di Politeknik Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah. International Journal Of Education And Pedagogy, 2(4), 479-488.

Roberts, G. A. (2007). The Effect of Extracurricular Activity Participation on the Relationship Between Parent Involvement and Academic Performance in a Sample of Third Grade Children. The University of Texas. Educational Psychology.

Sari, M. & Esa, A. (2017). Factors Affecting Student’s Participation in Extra-curricular. Elixir International Journal. Elixir Psychology, 107(2017) 46960-46962.

Sejtanic, S. (2018). Quality Of Communication Between Students And Teachers During Curricular And Extracurricular Activities. Discussions And Articles. Sk. Vjesn,67, 2, 343-355. University in Mostar.

Shannon, C. S. (2006). Parents' Messages about the Role of Extracurricular and Unstructured Leisure Activities: Adolescents' Perceptions. Journal of Leisure Research,38, (3), 398-420.

Shiamila, C. & Jamal@Nordin, Y. (2021). Hubungan antara Pengurusan dan Penglibatan Guru dengan Motivasi Murid dalam Kokurikulum di Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Tamil Daerah Temerloh, Pahang. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(7), 267 –276.

Simpkins, S. D., Vest, A. E., Dawes, N. P. & Neuman, K. I. (2010). Dynamic relations between parents' behaviors and children's motivational beliefs in sports and music. Parenting: Science and Practice, 10(2), 97–118.

Siraj, S. & Ibrahim, M. S. (2012). Standard Kompetensi Guru Malaysia. In Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTS 2012(pp. 1-44). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement. Educational and Urban Society,40, 179–204.

Tze, C. O., Tengku M. A. & Chee, S. L. (2021).Factors that Influence Welding Technology Students’ Involvement in Co-Curriculum at Vocational College. Online Journal For Tvet Practitioners,6(2),80-90. UTHM.

Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy, Indiana University.