The intentional dimension of teachers knowledge of pedagogy and ICT in teaching and learning of english: An initial inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v1i1.8143Abstract
As teacher educators in Malaysia with a commitment to the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in teaching and learning, we live and work in the diverse cultural and political contexts of education and schooling that affect many of our practices and beliefs. How can knowledge and understanding of pedagogy with ICT be constructed by teachers to promote effective teacher education in this field? The Smart Schools initiated by the government to proclaim its priority to increase the use of ICT in Malaysian schools (Smart School Blueprint, 1997) was neatly laid out. All teachers will be expected to show evidence of specific standards in their ICT capability through training given under Smart School Teacher Training Programme. This initial research inquiry focused on 'What is the intention dimension between teachers' knowledge of pedagogy and ICT in teaching and learning of English?' It is this range of theories and beliefs that generate action in the classroom. There are interesting and challenging claims made for the potential of ICT in teaching and learning. The purpose and role of the teacher can be clarified and refined in the context of using ICT (Scrimshaw, 1997a). In order to capture the ICT use intentional dimension portrayal, researcher has used a modified Concern Based Adoption Method (CBAM) (G.E. Hall & S.M.Hord (1987), and Susan Loucks-Horsley (1996) to analyze the level of use of ICT in the innovation among these teachers. In short, the research question changed from 'How does ICT support the development of teaching and learning?' to 'What is the intention between teachers' knowledge of pedagogy and ICT in teaching and learning? The cultural, political, emotional and moral experience of the teacher engaging with teaching and learning in the digitalised approach is admitted. The implications of the research for in-service teacher training and continuing professional development are acknowledged.
References
Alexander R. 1996. In search of good primary practice in Woods, P. (ed.) Contemporary issues in teaching and learning. London: Routledge, pp57-72.
Allwright, D. 1972. 'Prescription and description in the training of language teachers'. In J. Ovistgaard, H. Schwartz and H. Spang-Hanssen (eds.). Applied Linguistics: Problems and solutions. AILA Proceedings, vol.III: 150-66, Copenhagen. Heidelburg: Julius Groos Verlag.
Allwright, D. 1996. Teaching Classroom Learning Strategies: Some Considerations. In APLIUT, Lancaster University.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L 1986. Teachers' Thought Processes. In Wittrock, M.C.(eds) Handbook of Research on Teaching. 3rd. edition. A project of the American Educational Research Association. N. York: MacMillan.
Davis, N. 1997. Do electronic communications offer a new learning opportunity in education? in Somekh, B & Davis, N. (eds) (1997). Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.
Eisner, W. 1998. The Enlightenend Eye. Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. Prentice Hall: US.
Freeman, D. 1989. Teacher training, development and decision making model: A Model of teaching and related strategies for language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 23:27 -45.
Giroux, H.A. 1997. Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture and Schooling. Oxford: Westview Press.
Hargreaves, A. 1995. Development and Desire: a postmodern perspective in Guskey, T.R. & Huberman, M. (eds) (1995) Professional Development in Education: New Paradigms and Hewson, P., and M.Hewson. (1989). Analysis and use of a task for identifying conceptions of teaching science. Journal of Education for Teaching 15(3): 191-209.
Juraida Umat.2000. Web-Based Dissemination and Utilization of Learning Resources: TIGERWeb PROJECT. A Paper Presented at the Asia and the Pacific Seminar/ Workshop on Educational Technology - 2000 (Tokyo Seminar / Workshop 2000): Seminar/Workshop on 'The Development and the Utilization of a Learning Resource Package to Promote the Open and Flexible Lifelong Learning' - Sixth Programming Cycle of APEID Activities. 6 - 12 September 2000. Tokyo Gakugei University, Japan.
Kansanen, P.1993. An Outline of a Model of Teachers' Pedagogical Thinking. In P.Kansanen (ed.) Discussions on Some Educational Issues IV (pp. 51-65) Research Report 121. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki. (ED366562)
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1997. Laporan kursus, program latihan yang berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pendidikan Guru.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1998. Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Bahasa Inggeris KBSM Edisi Sekolah Bestari. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Lee S. Shulman, 1986. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform, in Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education, ed. M. Okazawa-Rey, J. Anderson and R. Traver (Cambridge: Harvard Educational Review, 1987), 313-34;Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching, Educational Researcher (February, 1986): 4-14.
Loveless, A. 1995a. The Role of IT: practical issues for primary teachers. London: Cassell.
Loveless, A. & Longman, D. 1997. Information Literacy: innuendo or insight? Paper presented at British Education Research Association Conference, York, 1997. [on-line] Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol.
Richards, J.C. 1987. The dilemma of teacher preparation in TESOL.TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 209-226.
Richards, J.C., & Crookes, G. 1988. The practicum in TESOL'. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 9-27.
Richards, J.C. 1990. The Dilemma of teacher education in second language teaching. In Richards, J.C. & Nunan, D. (eds.) Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C. & Nunan, D. (eds). 1990. Second Language Teacher Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C., Belinda Ho, & Karen Giblin. 1996. Learning how to teach in the RSA Cert. pp. 242-259. In Freeman, D & Richards, J.C. 1996. Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.
Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: philosophical papers Vol. 1 New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scrimshaw, P. 1997a. Computers and the teachers' role in Somekh, B. & Davis, N. (eds). Using information technology effectively in teaching and learning. London: Routledge.
S.M.Hord, W.C. Rutherford, L. Hurling-Austin & G.E. Hall. 1987. Taking Charge of Change. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (703) 549-3110.
Smith, L. 1980. Some not random thoughts of doing fieldwork: the interplay of values' in SIMONS, H. (ed.), Towards science of the singular. Norwich: CARE pp.179-205.
Smith, J. 1997. Learning to Live with Relativism Paper given at national conference on The Nature of Educational Research: Realism, Relativism or Post- Modernism?, held at Crewe School of Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, 10th May, 1997.
Susan Loucks-Horsley. 1996. National Standards & the Science Curriculum. (Eds.) Iowa: Kendall.
The Malaysian Smart School. April, 1997. An MSC Flagship Application. A Conceptual Blueprint. Smart School Project Team.
Tomlinson, P. 1999. Conscious reflection and Implicit Learning in Teacher Preparation. Part 1: recent light on an old. Oxford Review of Education, Sept. 99, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p406.
Underwood, J., Cavendish, S. & Lawson, T. 1996. Are Integrated Learning Systems Good for Teachers Too? Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5 (3), pp207-218.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Hamzah Md. Omar, Abdul Said Ambotang, Sabariah Sharif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



