Kajian persepsi guru terhadap agihan tugas dan kepuasan kerja: A study of teachers’ perceptions of task distribution and job satisfaction

Abdul Said Ambotang; Katriani Marijohn

doi:10.51200/jpp.v5i1.8204

Authors

Abdul Said Ambotang Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Katriani Marijohn SMK Sanzac, Kota Kinabalu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/jpp.v5i1.8204

Abstract

Dalam usaha mencapai kecemerlangan berterusan, kepimpinan sekolah perlu berperanan secara proaktif untuk membangunkan para guru kerana guru merupakan pelaksana dasar, visi dan misi sekolah dalam mencapai matlamat sekolah dan seterusnya merealisasikan Falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Kajian ini meninjau persepsi guru terhadap agihan tugas termasuk aspek beban tugas, perancangan dan kawalan, sikap guru dan kepuasan kerja guru. Kajian ini menggunakan instrumen soal selidik yang dijalankan terhadap 240 orang guru daripada enam buah sekolah menengah yang terdapat dalam daerah Kota Kinabalu. Sampel kajian dipilih menggunakan kaedah persampelan rawak berstrata. Data kajian dianalisis dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS for Windows versi 16.0. Statistik deskriptif (frekuensi, peratus, min dan sisihan piawai) digunakan untuk membuat bacaan, tafsiran serta menghuraikan hasil kajian. Statistik inferensi (ujian-t dua kumpulan tak bersandar, ANOVA, kolerasi Pearson-r dan regresi berganda) digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis kajian. Analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahawa persepsi guru terhadap agihan tugas adalah pada tahap yang tinggi. Hasil kajian juga menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang positif antara agihan tugas dengan kepuasan kerja guru. Ujian regresi berganda pula menunjukkan sikap guru dan agihan tugas adalah berpengaruh terhadap kepuasan kerja guru. Secara keseluruhannya, kedua-dua aspek ini memberi pengaruh sebanyak 40.7% ke atas kepuasan kerja guru dengan aspek sikap guru adalah pemberi pengaruh yang lebih tinggi berbanding agihan tugas.

An the pursuit of continuous excellence, school leadership needs to play a proactive role in developing teachers, as teachers are responsible for implementing the policies, vision, and mission of the school in achieving its goals and subsequently realising the National Education Philosophy. This study examined teachers’ perceptions of task distribution, including aspects of workload, planning and control, teachers’ attitudes, and job satisfaction. The study employed a questionnaire administered to 240 teachers from six secondary schools in the Kota Kinabalu district. The study sample was selected using stratified random sampling. The data were analysed using SPSS for Windows Version 16.0. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) were used to interpret and describe the findings. Inferential statistics, including the independent-samples t-test, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression, were used to test the research hypotheses. The descriptive analysis showed that teachers’ perceptions of task distribution were at a high level. The findings also indicated a positive relationship between task distribution and teachers’ job satisfaction. Multiple regression analysis further showed that teachers’ attitudes and task distribution influenced teachers’ job satisfaction. Overall, these two aspects accounted for 40.7% of the variance in teachers’ job satisfaction, with teachers’ attitudes having a greater influence than task distribution.

References

Abdul Shukur Abdullah. (1996). Penilaian semula situasi pengurusan sekolah. Seminar Pendidikan: Institusi Aminuddin Baki.

Adams, D. (2002). Education and national development: Priorities, policies, and planning. ADB Publication.

Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–401.

Avalos, B., & Haddad, W. (1981). A review of teacher effectiveness research in Africa, India, Latin America, Middle East, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand. IRDC.

Becker, W., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching methods in U.S. undergraduate economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 32(3), 269–280.

Bies, R. J. (2001). International (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & I. R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 99–118). Stanford University Press.

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

Gay, L. R., & Peter Airasian. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.

Goldhaber, B. (1976). The ICA communication audit: Rationale and development. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Convention, Kansas City.

Heller, R. B., & Dobbs, A. R. (1993). Age differences in word finding in discourse and non-discourse situations. Psychology and Aging, 8, 443–450.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Ibrahim Mamat. (1993). Kepimpinan sekolah: Teori untuk praktis. Kumpulan Budiman.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

Mohd Majid Konting. (1999). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Muhammad Surya. (1998). Percikan perjuangan guru. Aneka Ilmu.

Nyamazana, M. (1990). Manpower planning and labour shortages [Ph.D.dissertation, School of Oriental Studies, London].

Robiah Sidin. (2003). Teori pengurusan pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd. Nordin. (1993). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan ke arah pemantapan pelaksanaan dasar pendidikan selaras dengan Wawasan 2020. Seminar Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.