SUSTAINING LONG-DISTANCE RELATIONSHIP THROUGH LOVE, TRUST, AND DEDICATION AMONG MARRIED COUPLES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v34i1.4475Keywords:
Love, trust, commitment, marital maintenance, long-distance marriage couplesAbstract
Today’s socio-economic aspects often shape the diverse family dynamics in which couples opt for long-distance marriages that require them to live separately and apart to earn better incomes. Living separately and away are certainly a challenge that requires appropriate action between the long-distance marriage couples. This study examines how love, trust, and commitment help married couples maintain their long-distance relationships. The importance of those three feelings in determining the continuation of marriages was the focus of the long-distance relationship factor. A total of 110 married couples living apart were the subject of the study in which intimacy, passion, and commitment comprised the three love-related dimensions that were measured. While commitment included the intention to persist, a sense of attachment, and a long-term perspective, trust was scored on a single domain. The Triangular Love Scale measured the love variable, the Dyadic Trust Scale gauged trust, the Investment Model Scale (IMS) measured commitment (Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998), and the Relationship Maintenance Scale evaluated marital maintenance. Passion (r =.294**, k.002) and trust (r =.249**, k.001) were found to have significant positive relationships with marital maintenance while only the commitment domain for long-term orientation had a similar relationship with marital maintenance (r =.199*, k.002). Therefore, the findings suggest that long-term commitment orientation, passion, and trust are likely to promote distance-separated married couples preserve their marriages. The implication is that those three facets are key drivers in preserving and enhancing long-distance marriage bonds among such couples.
References
Amelia, F.R. (2020). Long-distance romantic relationships among international students: “My first qualitative research”. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education (SiPoSE), 1(1), 74-86.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. USA: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. USA: Polity Press.
Bente, G., Ruggenberg, S., Kramer, N., & Eschenburg, F. (2008). Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research, 34, 287- 318.
Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In Kelley, H. H. (Eds.), Close Relationships (pp. 1–19). Freeman.
Chonody, J. M., Killian, M., Gabb, J., & Dunk-West, P. (2017). Understanding everyday relationship work: The development of a relationship maintenance scale. Advances in Social Work, 17(2), 355–368.
Dainton, M. (1994). An examination of routine and strategic interactions in maintained marital relationships (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Ohio.
Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2001). Patterns of communication channel use in the maintenance of long-distance relationships. Communication Research Reports.
Dainton, M., & Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 52-66.
Dharmawijati, D.R. (2016). Komitmen dalam berpacaran jarak jauh pada wanita dewasa awal. Jurnal Psikologi, 4(2), 237-248.
Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 163-173.
Dindia, K., & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2006). What partners do to maintain their close relationships. In P. Noller, & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Close relationships: Functions, Forms and Processes (pp. 305–324). Psychology Press.
Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J. Canary, & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and Relational Maintenance (pp. 45–60). Academic Press.
Gerstel, N., & Gross, H. (1984). Commuter marriage: A study of work and family. New York / London: Guilford Publications.
Heller, P. E. (2000). The influence of religious and ethnic differences on marital intimacy: Intermarriages versus intramarriage. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), 241-252.
Jacobs, K. B., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 196-206.
Jenny Ratna Suminar & Siti Murni Kaddi. (2018). The phenomenon of marriage couples with long-distance relationship. Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, 34(1), 121 – 129.
Jimenez, F.V., & Asendorpf, J.B. (2010). Shared everyday decisions and constructive communication: Protective factors in long-distance romantic relationships. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 4(2), 157-182.
Johnson, E., & Moosath, H. (2019). Exploring the role of distance in trust and marital-quality in married women. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 24(2), 14-24.
Jurkane-Hobein, I. (2015). I Imagine You Here Now. Relationship Maintenance Strategies in Long-Distance Intimate Relationships. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Social Sciences 108. 78 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis.
Kariuki, J.W. (2014). The impact of long-distance marriage on the family: A study of families with spouses abroad in Kiambu County (Masters Dissertation). University of Nairobi.
Kelmer, G., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S., & Markman, H. J. (2013). Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships. Family Process, 52, 257–270.
Kublay, D., & Oktan, V. (2015). Evlilik uyumu: Değer tercihleri ve öznel mutluluk açısından incelenmesi [Marital adjustment: The examination in terms of value preferences and subjective happiness]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 5(44), 25-35.
Larzelere, R. E., & Huston, T. L. (1980). The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 595-604.
Le, B., Loving, T. J., Lewandowski, G. W., Feinberg, E. G., Johnson, K. C., Fiorentino, R., & Ing, J. (2008). Missing a romantic partner: A prototype analysis. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 511–532.
Lembaga Penduduk dan Pembangunan Keluarga Negara, LPPKN. (2014). Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat. Malaysia.
Leon, E., Palacios, J., Roman, M., Moreno, C., & Penarrubia, M. G. (2015). Parental stress, family functioning, children’s psychological adjustment in adoptive families: A comparative and longitudinal study. Family Science, 6(1), 50-57.
McBride, M.C., & Bergen, K.M. (2014). Voices of women in commuter marriages: A site of discursive struggle. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1-19. DOI: 10.1177/0265407514522890
Mietzner, S., & Lin, L.-W. (2005). Would you do it again? Relationship skills gained in a long-distance relationship. College Student Journal, 39, 192-200.
Pathan, Z. A. (2015). Adversities of marital conflict: A sociological analysis. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(2), 19-25. DOI:10.9790/0837-20241925
Perlman, D. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing relationships: Concluding commentary. In J. Harvey, & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 357-377). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pistole, M. C., & Roberts, A. (2011). Measuring long-distance romantic relationships: A validity study. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 63–76.
Richard, G., Anne, C.F. (2007). Miles that bind: Commuter marriage and family strengths. Michigan Family Review, 12, 7-31.
Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and
deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101-117.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-391.
Sahlstein, E.M. (2004). Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(5), 689-710.
Sandow, E. (2014). Till work do us part: The social fallacy of long-distance commuting. Urban Studies, 51 (3), 526-543.
Scott, A.T. (2002). Communication characterizing successful long-distance marriages (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.
Shrimpton, M., & Storey, K. (2001). The effects of offshore employment in the petroleum industry: Cross-national perspective. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Environmental Studies Program.
Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vincent, C. D., & Neis, B. L. (2011). Work and family life: Parental work schedule and child academic achievement. Community, Work & Family, 14(4), 449-468.
Winfield, F. E. (1985) Commuter marriage: Living together apart. Columbia University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All right reserved. No part of this publication can be reproduced without prior written permission of the copyright holder. The written permission of the copyright holder must be obtained before any parts of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
Requests for permission to duplicate an article, review or part of this journal should be addressed to the Chief Editor, MANU, Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Total Views: 929
| 
Total Downloads: 1043
