THE TRANSFORMATIVE ROLE OF SPORTS DIPLOMACY IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: FROM COLD WAR UNITY TO REGIONAL CONFLICT MITIGATION

RAYMOND MENG HUI TOH; ASMADY  IDRIS

doi:10.51200/manu.v37i1.7325

Authors

RAYMOND MENG HUI TOH Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
ASMADY IDRIS Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51200/manu.v37i1.7325

Keywords:

sports diplomacy, regional unity, ASEAN, SEA Games

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the role of sports diplomacy in fostering unity and resolving conflicts in Southeast Asia, with a focus on the Cold War era and the SEA Games. During the Cold War, the Southeast Asian Peninsular (SEAP) Games enabled nations with differing ideologies to engage constructively, emphasizing shared values. In the post-Cold War era, the SEA Games played a critical role in mitigating conflicts, such as the Indonesia-Malaysia Confrontation and the Thailand-Cambodia Preah Vihear Temple dispute, by promoting dialogue and cultural exchange. While challenges like economic disparities and hyper-nationalism persist, this research highlights the enduring potential of sports as a diplomatic tool for peace and regional cohesion. By analysing historical and contemporary contexts, the study provides insights into innovative approaches for regional integration and conflict resolution, emphasizing the importance of leveraging ASEAN’s cultural and athletic traditions for unity.

Author Biographies

RAYMOND MENG HUI TOH, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,
Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
Jalan UMS, 88400,
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

ASMADY IDRIS, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan, Universiti Malaysia Sabah

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan,
Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
Jalan UMS, 88400,
Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

References

Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Amer, R. (2009). Regionalism and conflict management: A case study of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263467789

ASEAN. (1976). Treaty of amity and cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC). ASEAN Secretariat. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/databasecil/1976-treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-3/

BiblioAsia. (2024). Konfrontasi: Singapore’s experience of an undeclared war. https://biblioasia.nlb.gov.sg/vol-19/issue-4/jan-mar-2024/singapore-malaysia-indonesia-konfrontasi-confrontation/

Centre for International Law. (2024). Treaty of amity and cooperation in Southeast Asia (1976). National University of Singapore. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/databasecil/1976-treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-3/

Creak, S. (2020). Sporting regionalism in Southeast Asia: Games, nation, and state-building. Modern Asian Studies, 54(6), 1920–1961. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X2000036X

Hoang, T. H. (2020). ASEAN and the South China Sea code of conduct: Raising the aegis of international law. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/media/commentaries/asean-and-the-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct-raising-the-aegis-of-international-law/

International Court of Justice. (2013). Request for interpretation of the judgment of 15 June 1962 in the case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand). https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/151

Kanchchanadit, A. (2024). Hosting the SEAP Games/SEA Games with Malaysia’s politics and foreign affairs (1965–1989). Parichart Journal, 37(1), 175–189. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/parichartjournal/article/view/269090

Kuik, C.-C. (2025). The DOC and dispute management in the South China Sea: Maintaining dialogue, maximising convergences. Centre for China Studies, University of Hong Kong. https://cccw.hku.hk/publications/articles/the-doc-and-dispute-management-in-the-south-china-sea-maintaining-dialogue-maximizing-convergences/

Leong, A. K. W. (2016). The war that gave birth to ASEAN. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/the-war-that-gave-birth-to-asean/

Lim, P. H., & Aman, M. S. (2015). The history of the South East Asian Peninsular Games, 1959–1975. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 33(5), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2015.1062371

Limsiritong, S. (2020). The ASEAN dispute settlement mechanism. International Journal of Multidisciplinary in Management and Tourism, 4(1). https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ijmmt/article/view/248784

Mangku, D. G. S. (2011). Peluang dan tantangan ASEAN dalam penyelesaian sengketa Kuil Preah Vihear di perbatasan Kamboja dan Thailand. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 6(2), 121–132.

Setyowati, H., & Nurulita, A. (2023). The role of ASEAN in dispute resolution between Thailand and Cambodia. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia, 2(1), 38–52. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ildisea/article/view/66152

Singhaputargun, N. (2016). The Thailand–Cambodia Preah Vihear Temple dispute: Its past, present and future. In J. Saravanamuttu (Ed.), Contemporary conflicts in Southeast Asia: Towards a new ASEAN way of conflict management (pp. 111–135). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Sothirak, P. (2013). Cambodia's border conflict with Thailand. Southeast Asian Affairs 2013, 87–100.

Steinemann, G. (2013). ASEAN’s weak role in bilateral dispute settlement: The case of Preah Vihear. Asian Review, 26(1), 25–40.

Turcsányi, R. Q., & Kříž, Z. (2017). ASEAN and the Thai–Cambodian conflict: The final stage at Preah Vihear? In C. Schofield (Ed.),

Unresolved border, land and maritime disputes in Southeast Asia (pp. 83–109). Brill.

Wagener, M. (2011). Lessons from Preah Vihear: Thailand, Cambodia, and the nature of low-intensity border conflicts. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 30(3), 27–59.

Yoosuk, U. (2013). The Preah Vihear Temple: Roots of Thailand–Cambodia border dispute. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(4), 921–929.