Perkongsian Pengetahuan Tasit Guru Kebitaraan Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah Harian (Kluster Kecemerlangan)
Keywords:
sharing of tacit knowledge, Pedagogy and Content Knowledge, Technology Pedagogy Content Knowledge, Malay Language niche teacherAbstract
Perkongsian pengetahuan tasit dalam bidang pengurusan pendidikan kurang mendapat liputan para penyelidik tempatan disebabkan kesukaran untuk mengenal pasti sifat pengetahuan tasit. Di sekolah, guru kurang menyedari kelebihan pengetahuan tasit sebagai inspirasi dalam pengajaran dan oleh itu tidak mampu mengurus pengetahuan tasit mereka dengan baik. Bagi merapatkan lompang ini, kajian ini dijalankan untuk meneroka perkongsian pengetahuan tasit guru kebitaraan Bahasa Melayu di sekolah kluster kecemerlangan. Sebanyak enam kes dikaji dengan menggunakan pendekatan kajian kes fenomenologi, bersama kaedah temu bual semi berstruktur, pemerhatian dan catatan lapangan. Pemilihan peserta kajian secara bertujuan dikendalikan untuk menjawab dua persoalan kajian. Perubahan bentuk pengetahuan tasit diuji dengan Teori Penciptaan Pengetahuan Organisasi (Nonaka, 1994). Hasil kajian ini mendapati pengetahuan tasit guru berubah dari pengetahuan tasit menjadi pengetahuan eksplisit manakala pengetahuan tasit peribadi berubah menjadi pengetahuan tasit orang lain. Dalam pada itu, pengetahuan tasit guru diperoleh dalam bentuk pengetahuan dan kemahiran khusus berserta pengalaman mengajar setelah beberapa tahun guru berkhidmat. Seterusnya, kemahiran guru dalam Pengetahuan Pedagogi Isi Kandungan (PPIK) lebih baik berbanding dengan kemahiran dalam Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi Isi Kandungan (PTPK). Lanjutan daripada itu, didapati pengetahuan tasit guru dari segi teknik dan kaedah pembelajaran lebih mudah diekstrak ke bentuk pengetahuan eksplisit berbanding dengan pengalaman guru. Manakala, penggunaan alat teknologi dalam PTPK hanya elemen tambahan untuk melengkapi keperluan untuk kemahiran PPIK guru. Kajian ini membawa implikasi dari aspek mengurus pengetahuan tasit diri dan mengesan pengetahuan tasit orang lain; menjadikan pengetahuan tasit sebagai sumber kreativiti pengajaran dan pembelajaran; serta kualiti guru. Dari perspektif jangka panjang, perkongsian merupakan strategi proaktif untuk mengurus pengetahuan tasit pendidikan dengan sistematik.
The sharing of tacit knowledge in the field of educational management is less widely covered by local researchers due to the difficulty of identifing the nature of tacit knowledge. In schools, teachers are less aware of the advantage of tacit knowledge as inspiration in teaching and therefore are unable to manage their tacit knowledge well. To bridge this gap, this study aims to explore the tacit knowledge sharing of Malay Language niche teacher in the cluster school in excellence. A total of six cases were studied using a phenomenology case study approach with semistructured interview, observation, and field notes. Purposive sampling was intended to be used to answer the four research questions. Changes in the form of tacit knowledge has been interpreted by using the Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation (Nonaka, 1994). It was found that tacit knowledge had changed from tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge while personal tacit knowledge reformed as others’ tacit knowledge. Teachers’ tacit knowledge is found in the form of specialized knowledge and skills as well as teaching experience after several years of service as a teacher. Besides, it was found that teachers’ skills in Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (PPIK) are better than the skills in Technology Pedagogy Content Knowledge (PTPK). Teachers’ tacit knowledge in terms of learning techniques and methods is more easily extracted into the form of explicit knowledge than teachers’ experience. The use of technological tools in PTPK is only an additional element to complement their PPIK skills needs. This study has implications from the aspect of managing one’s own tacit knowledge and tracking the tacit knowledge of others; making tacit knowledge as a source of teaching and learning creativity; as well as the quality of teachers. From the long-term perspective, sharing is the proactive strategy for managing the educational tacit knowledge systematically.
References
Abdul Hameed Abdul Majid. (2017). Improving Descriptive Writing Ability using Facebook in a Blended Learning Class. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 18: 52 – 60.
Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Vimalanandan, L. (2017). Mathematical knowledge for teaching: Making the tacit more explicit in mathematics teacher education. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847.
Adloff, F., Gerund, K., & Kaldewey, D. (2015). Locations, Translations, and Presentifications of Tacit Knowledge. Revealing Tacit Knowledge: Embodiment and Explication. (pp. 7 – 20). Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
Alvis, J. W. (2018). Making sense of Heidegger’s ‘phenomenology of the inconspicuous’ or inapparent. Continental Philosophy Review, 51, 211 – 238.
Andersson, J., & Ostman, L. (2015). A Transactional Way of Analysing the Learning of ‘Tacit Knowledge.’ Interchange, 46(3), 271 – 287.
Azhar Ahmad., & Mohd Mahzan Awang. (2017). Perbezaan Aplikasi TMK dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sejarah Berpandukan Demografi Guru. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 18, 92 – 104.
Berry, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Loughran, J. (2015). Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education. In A. Berry, P.Friedrichsen., & J. Loughran (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77 – 101
Bryman, A., & Robert G, B. (eds.). (2002). Analyzing Qualitative Data. . London: Routledge.
Campbell, L. (2018). An epistemology for practical knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
(2), 159 – 177.
Chien, L. S. (2016). Form Four Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptualization of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. PhD Thesis (Unpublished). Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya.
Chiew, C. M., Dali, M. H., & Lim, C. S. (2016). Implimentation of lesson study as an innovative professional development model among Malaysian School Teachers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13, 83 – 111.
Chua, Y. P. (2011). Kaedah dan statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGrawHill.
Chuang, C. H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Can Knowledge-Intensive Teamwork Be Managed?
Examining the Roles of HRM Systems, Leadership, and Tacit Knowledge. Journal of
Management, 42(2), 524 – 554.
Coleman, L. J. (2014). The invisible world of professional practical knowledge of a teacher of the
gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(1), 18 – 29.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches.
Book (2nd ed).
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (Internation). Los Angeles: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dewitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2013). Merekabentuk interaksi bagi pembelajaran dalam talian: Pedagogi modul CmL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(2), 20 – 31.
Elo, S., Kaarianen, M., Kanste, O., Polkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngas, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1) 1 – 10.
Frost, K. (2019). A metaphysics for practical knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(3),
– 340.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research. An Introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Garritz, A. (2015). PCK for dummies. Part 2: Personal vs Canonical PCK. Educacion Quimica. 26(2): 77 – 80.
Goh, P. S. C., & Wong, K. T. (2014). Beginning teachers’ conceptions of competency: Implications to educational policy and teacher education in Malaysia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13, 65 – 79.
Ismail, K., Nopiah, Z. M., Rasul, M. S., & Leong, P. C. (2017). Malaysian teachers’ competency in technical vocational education and training: A review. Regionalization and Harmonization in TVET, 59 – 64.
Jisr, R. E., & Maamari, B. E. (2017). Effectuation: Exploring a Third Dimension to Tacit Knowledge.
Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 72 – 78.
Kawamura, K. M. (2016). Kristine Marin Kawamura, PhD interviews Ikujiro Nonaka, PhD. Cross
Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(4), 613 – 632.
Khor, M. T., & Lim, H. L. (2014). Pengetahuan Teknologi Pedagogi Kandungan (PTPK) dalam Kalangan Guru Matematik Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 4(1), 29 – 43.
King, N. (2004). Using Templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, 256 – 270. London, UK: Sage.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., Cheo, M., & Baumert, J. (2015). Content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwanese and German mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 115 – 126.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 9(1), 60 – 70.
Komathi Jairaman, Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed Zamri, & Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim. (2016). Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher’s Subject Matter Knowledge Of The Mode As A Measure of Central Tendency. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(3), 1 – 11.
KPM. (2016). Dokumen Awal Pelan Induk Pembangunan Profesionalisme Keguruan. Malaysia: BPG, KPM.
Lejano, R., Guo, J., Lian, H., & Yin, B. (2019). A Phenomenology of Institutions. [Preview].New York: Routledge.
Malterud, K. 2001. Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet. 358: 483 – 488.
MAMPU. 2012. Etos Perkhidmatan Awam. Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Mena-Marcos, J., & Clarke, A. 2015. Eliciting teachers’ practical knowledge through mentoring conversations in practicum settings. Mentoring for Learning: Climbing the Mountain.
(2002): 47 – 78.
Merriam, S. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Mohd Aizat Abu Hassan. 2017. Penggunaan Perisian “Tux Paint” di dalam aktiviti menggambar Pendidikan Seni Visual di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan. 18: 162 – 174.
Noorazura Abdul Rahman. 2017. Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 di semua sekolah. BH Online. Norfadilah Kamaruddin. 2015. Understanding Patterns of Interactive Coueseware Use Within Malaysia Primary Smart School. Malaysian online Journal Of Educational Technology. 3(1): 49 – 54.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 16(1): 1 – 13.
Pajuzi Awang, & Norazah Mohd Nordin. 2017. Penilaian Reka Bentuk Aplikasi Pembelajaran Mudah Alih (m-KBAT App) dalam Pendidikan Sains untuk Guru Pra Perkhidmatan. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan. 18: 213 – 223.
Polanyi, M. 1966. The Logic of Tacit Inference. Philosophy. 41(155): 1 – 18.
Power, F. B. 2017. In the moment: A phenomenological case study of the dynamic nature of awareness and sensemaking. WMSCI 2017 - 21st World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings. (Vol. 1, pp. 54 – 60).
Rahmany, R., Hassani, M. T., & Fattahi, H. 2014. Teachers’ Individual Practical Knowledge about Teaching Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 5(2): 452 – 459.
Rao, B. N., Subramaniam, S., & V. Sathasivam, R. 2016. Year four novice science teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and practices in teaching skilful thinking. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik. 4(April): 42 – 50.
Rossetto, T. 2018. Repeat photography, post-phenomenology and “being-with” through the image (at the First World War cemeteries of Asiago, Italy). . Retrieved from https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Saldana, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. . London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Saldana, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. (2nd Editio.). London: Sage Publications.
Savage, J. 2000. One voice, different tunes: Issues raised by dual analysis of a segment of qualitative data. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 31(6): 1493 – 1500.
Shulman, L. S. 1986. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher. 15(2): 4 – 14.
Silverman, D. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research A Practical Handbook Fourth Edition. (4th ed.). India: Sage.
Singh, K., & Southcott, J. 2019. A Sikh Boy’s Exclusion in Australian School: A Phenomenological Study. The Qualitative Report. 24(8): 2028 – 2047.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Yusminah M Yusof, & Effandi Zakaria. 2015. The Integration of Teacher’s Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components in Teaching Linear Equation. International Education Studies. 8(11): 26.
Yusminah Mohd Yusof. 2012. Pengajaran dan pengintegrasian komponen pengetahuan pedagogikal isi kandungan (PCK) guru dalam algebra. . [Tesis PhD][Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia].
Zhang, X., Long, C., Wang, Y., & Tang, G. 2015. The impact of employees’ relationships on tacit
knowledge sharing. Chinese Management Studies. 9(4): 611 – 625
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Total Views: 41
| 
Total Downloads: 37
