A Needs Analysis Study in Developing Quantum Physics Instructional Module for Secondary School With an Integrated Stem Education Approach

Authors

  • Laurah Markus

Keywords:

instructional module, needs analysis, secondary school, STEM education, quantum physics

Abstract

Effective instructional strategies have been highlighted in teaching Quantum physics (QP) since this topic is theoretically complex and different from classical physics. In addressing this issue, a needs analysis (NA) was carried out to identify the anticipated challenges in QP learning and facilitation (L&F) and the integration of STEM education in a physics classroom. This research is a qualitative study where a semi-structured interview was conducted with two experts in physics education and two physics teachers selected under a purposive sampling approach. The interview was one-on-one through online platforms, held during the Covid-19 pandemic’s
mobility control order (MCO). The data from the semi-structured interview was analysed using thematic analysis, and the findings were presented as thematic maps.Two major themes emerged from the thematic analysis: 1) the expectation in QP L&F based on experts’ and teachers’ views and 2) the discrepancies in SSQP-STEM L&F gathered from the teachers’ opinions and perspectives. The first theme denotes 1.1) teachers’ professional development, 1.2) pedagogical content knowledge, 1.3) instructional strategy, and 1.4) QP L&F resources. The second theme describes the discrepancies of SSQP-STEM L&F in terms of 2.1) QP nature, 2.2) insufficiency of resources in QP L&F, and 2.3) teachers’ perceptions of students’ characteristics in the physics classroom, and 2.4) the teachers’ competencies issues in teaching QP. Overall, the finding shows that a practical instructional module needs to be developed to cater to the physics teachers’ demands.

Author Biography

Laurah Markus

Universiti Malaysia Sabah,

Malaysia

References

Amani Dahaman. (2014). Development of m-Learning Arabic Module in Teacher Education Institute. University of Malaya.

Amelia, N., & Lilia Halim. (2019). Cabaran Pengintegrasian Pendidikan STEM Dalam Kurikulum Malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan, September, 1 – 10.

Aydın, B., Melek, M., Alan, B., & Sağlam, S. (2017). Combining the old and the new: Designing a curriculum based on the taba model and the global scale of English. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 304 – 320.

Bednarik, R. (2002). Evaluation of Educational Environments. The TUP Model. University of Joensuu.

Bednarik, R., Gerdt, P., Miraftabi, R., & Tukiainen, M. (2004). Development of the TUP model - Evaluating educational software. Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, 699 – 701. https://doi.org/10.1109/

ICALT.2004.1357627

Bouchée, T., Thurlings, M., de Putter - Smits, L., & Pepin, B. (2021). Investigating teachers’ and students’ experiences of quantum physics lessons: opportunities and challenges. Research in Science and Technological Education, 00(00), 1 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1948826

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2006), 77 – 101. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35913-1

Bungum, B., Henriksen, E. K., Angell, C., Tellefsen, C. W., & Bøe, M. V. (2015). ReleQuant – Improving teaching and learning in quantum physics through educational design research. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 11(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2043

Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2015). Pendidikan STEM Bersepadu: Perspektif Global , Perkembangan Semasa di Malaysia, dan Langkah Kehadapan. The Bulletin of the Johor Association of Science and Mathematics Education, 25(1)(November 2015), 1 – 6.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. a, Gardner, a, Scotter, P. V, Powell, J. C., Westbrook, a, & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. Bscs, January, 1 – 19.

Cohen, L., Mnion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. In Education And

Training (Sixth Edit, Issue August). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In H. Salmon, C. Neve, & M. O’Heffernan (Eds.), SAGE Publications (5Th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Denzin, N. K. (2008). The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21(4), 315 – 325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390802136995

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth edit). Sage Publication, Inc.

Dobbie, A., Rhodes, M., Tysinger, J. W., & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a modified nominal group

technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. Family Medicine, 36(6), 402 – 406.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication. New York University Press.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. In Journal of Professional Nursing (Vol. 8, Issue 1). Sage Publication, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-7223(92)90119-j

Kaufman, R., & English, F. W. (1979). Needs Assessment: Concept and Application. Educational Technology Publications, Inc.

Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26

Kohnle, A., Bozhinova, I., Browne, D., Everitt, M., Fomins, A., Kok, P., Kulaitis, G., Prokopas, M., Raine, D., & Swinbank, E. (2014). A new introductory quantum mechanics curriculum. European Journal of Physics, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/1/015001

Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & Joolingen, W. R. Van. (2018). Key topics for quantum mechanics at secondary schools : a Delphi study into expert opinions. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1550273

Lin, C. (2013). Application of fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to criteria weights for fashion design scheme evaluation. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 25(3), 171 – 183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09556221311300192

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Curriculum development: Inductive models. Schooling, 2(1), 1 – 8.

Malgieri, M., Onorato, P., & Ambrosis, A. De. (2017). Test on the effectiveness of the sum over paths approach in favoring the construction of an integrated knowledge of quantum physics in high school. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010101-1 – 25. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010101

Markus, L., Sungkim, S., & Ishak, M. Z. Bin. (2021). Issues and Challenges in Teaching Secondary School Quantum Physics with Integrated STEM Education in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(5), 190 – 202. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i5.774

Mazidah, M. R., Suriayati, C., & Nurulhuda Firdaus, M. A. (2018). Usability Analysis using Modified Nominal Group Technique for Software Traceability Model with Test Effort Estimation. Open International Journal of Informatics, 6(3), 1 – 10.

McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2007). A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 77(1), 87 – 94. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2978181

McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2885199

Mckillip, J. (2011). Identifying needs. In Need Analysis (pp. 7 – 18). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985260

McKillip, J. (1987). Need analysis: Tools for the human services and education. In Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 10. SAGE Publications, Inc.

McKillip, J. (2011). Evaluating Needs: Models and Examples. In Need Analysis (pp. 19 – 31). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985260

Meltzer, D. E. (2011). Research on the education of physics teachers. Teacher Education in Physics. Research, Curriculum, and Practice, 3 – 14.

Merriman, S. E., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2021). What can we learn from Automated Vehicle collisions? A deductive thematic analysis of five Automated Vehicle collisions. Safety Science, 141(December 2020), 105320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

ssci.2021.105320

Moraga-Calderón, T., Buisman, H., Cramer, J., Moraga-calder, T. S., Buisman, H., & Cramer, J. (2020). The Relevance of Learning Quantum Physics from the Perspective of the Secondary School Student: A Case Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 32 – 50

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nur Farhana Ramli, & Othman Talib. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement STEM? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 2222 – 6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772

Portillo, E. C., Look, K., Mott, D., Breslow, R., Kieser, M., & Gallimore, C. (2020). Intentional Application of the Taba Curriculum Model to Develop a Rural Pharmacy Practice Course. INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, 11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i1.2089

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research (L. Akers & A. Messina (eds.); 1st edition). Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates, Inc.

Rodriguez, L. V. (2018). Teaching the wave-particle duality to secondary school students: an analysis of the Dutch context (Issue December). University of Twente.

Saffie, N. A. M., Shukor, N. M., Khairul A. Rasmani, & Rasmani, K. A. (2017). Fuzzy Delphi method: Issues and Challenges. 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), 1 – 7. https://doi.org/10.1109/liss.2016.7854490

Scharp, K. M., & Sanders, M. L. (2019). What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. Communication Teacher, 33(2), 117 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2018.1536794

Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, S., Osman, K., Ikhsan, Z., & Rahim, F. (2015). Bitara-StemTM training of trainers’ programme: Impact on trainers’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and efficacy towards integrated stem teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 85 – 95.

Stadermann, H. K. E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of nature of science in quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 997 – 1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1745926

Sungkim, S. B., Markus, L., & Ishak, M. Z. Bin. (2021). Teacher Readiness to teach Quantum Physics (TRQP): An Instrument for Form Five Physics Teacher in Secondary School.

Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(5), 146 – 164. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i5.775

Supurwoko, S., Cari, C., Sarwanto, S., Sukarmin, S., & Suparmi, S. (2017). The effect of Phet Simulation media for physics teacher candidate understanding on photoelectric effect concept. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(1),

– 39. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5108

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic Analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17 – 36). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2

Turner III, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design : A Practical Guide for Novice Investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754 – 760.

Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing (First Edition). SAGE Publications Ltd.

While, A., & Barriball, K. L. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(7), 328 – 335.

Whiting, L. (2008). Semi-structured interviews for novice researhers. Nursing Standard, 22(23), 35 – 40.

Witkin, B. R. (1994). Needs assessment since 1981: The state of the practice. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 17 – 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90056-6

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

Laurah Markus. (2022). A Needs Analysis Study in Developing Quantum Physics Instructional Module for Secondary School With an Integrated Stem Education Approach. Borneo International Journal of Education (BIJE), 2, 69–84. Retrieved from https://jurcon.ums.edu.my/ojums/index.php/bije/article/view/4113
Total Views: 202 | Total Downloads: 33